How Does Post-Earnings Announcement Sentiment Affect Firms’ Dynamics? New Evidence from Causal Machine Learning

IF 1.8 3区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Financial Econometrics Pub Date : 2022-07-12 DOI:10.1093/jjfinec/nbac018
F. Audrino, Jonathan Chassot, Chen-Jui Huang, M. Knaus, M. Lechner, J. Ortega
{"title":"How Does Post-Earnings Announcement Sentiment Affect Firms’ Dynamics? New Evidence from Causal Machine Learning","authors":"F. Audrino, Jonathan Chassot, Chen-Jui Huang, M. Knaus, M. Lechner, J. Ortega","doi":"10.1093/jjfinec/nbac018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n We revisit the role played by sentiment extracted from news articles related to earnings announcements as a driver of firms’ return, volatility, and trade volume dynamics. To this end, we apply causal machine learning on the earnings announcements of a wide cross-section of U.S. companies. This approach allows us to investigate firms’ price and volume reactions to different types of post-earnings announcement sentiment (positive, negative, and mixed sentiments) under various underlying macroeconomic, financial, and aggregated investors’ moods in a properly defined causal framework. Our empirical results support the presence of (i) economically sizable differences in the effects among sentiment types that are mostly of a non-linear nature depending on the underlying economic and financial conditions; (ii) a leverage effect in sentiment where reactions are (on average) larger for negative sentiment; and (iii) investors’ underreaction to news. In particular, we show that the difference in the average causal effects of the sentiment’s types is larger and more relevant when the general macroeconomic conditions are worse, the investors are pessimist about the behavior of the market and/or its uncertainty is higher, and in market regimes characterized by high stocks’ liquidity.","PeriodicalId":47596,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Econometrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Econometrics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbac018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We revisit the role played by sentiment extracted from news articles related to earnings announcements as a driver of firms’ return, volatility, and trade volume dynamics. To this end, we apply causal machine learning on the earnings announcements of a wide cross-section of U.S. companies. This approach allows us to investigate firms’ price and volume reactions to different types of post-earnings announcement sentiment (positive, negative, and mixed sentiments) under various underlying macroeconomic, financial, and aggregated investors’ moods in a properly defined causal framework. Our empirical results support the presence of (i) economically sizable differences in the effects among sentiment types that are mostly of a non-linear nature depending on the underlying economic and financial conditions; (ii) a leverage effect in sentiment where reactions are (on average) larger for negative sentiment; and (iii) investors’ underreaction to news. In particular, we show that the difference in the average causal effects of the sentiment’s types is larger and more relevant when the general macroeconomic conditions are worse, the investors are pessimist about the behavior of the market and/or its uncertainty is higher, and in market regimes characterized by high stocks’ liquidity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
财报公布后的情绪如何影响公司的动态?因果机器学习的新证据
我们重新审视了从与盈利公告相关的新闻文章中提取的情绪作为公司回报、波动性和交易量动态的驱动因素所发挥的作用。为此,我们将因果机器学习应用于广泛的美国公司的盈利公告。这种方法使我们能够在适当定义的因果框架中,调查公司在各种潜在宏观经济、金融和综合投资者情绪下对不同类型的盈利后情绪(积极、消极和混合情绪)的价格和数量反应。我们的实证结果支持(i)情绪类型之间的影响在经济上存在相当大的差异,这些差异大多是非线性的,取决于潜在的经济和金融条件;(ii)情绪的杠杆效应,其中负面情绪的反应(平均)更大;以及(iii)投资者对新闻反应不足。特别是,我们发现,当总体宏观经济条件更糟,投资者对市场行为持悲观态度和/或其不确定性更高,以及在以高股票流动性为特征的市场制度中,情绪类型的平均因果效应的差异更大,也更具相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
8.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: "The Journal of Financial Econometrics is well situated to become the premier journal in its field. It has started with an excellent first year and I expect many more."
期刊最新文献
Large-Dimensional Portfolio Selection with a High-Frequency-Based Dynamic Factor Model Exploiting Intraday Decompositions in Realized Volatility Forecasting: A Forecast Reconciliation Approach A Structural Break in the Aggregate Earnings–Returns Relation Large Sample Estimators of the Stochastic Discount Factor Jump Clustering, Information Flows, and Stock Price Efficiency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1