Collaborative Curating: Democratising Inclusion

IF 0.1 0 ART De Arte Pub Date : 2020-09-25 DOI:10.1080/00043389.2020.1815951
J. Crawshay-Hall
{"title":"Collaborative Curating: Democratising Inclusion","authors":"J. Crawshay-Hall","doi":"10.1080/00043389.2020.1815951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this article, I discuss the perceived failure of the second Johannesburg biennale, Trade Routes: History amd Geography, curated by Okwui Enwezor in 1997. Although curating can be used as a socio-critical tool, Enwezor's authorial curatorial model as witnessed in Trade Routes is criticised for being non-responsive towards issues the South African public was actively dealing with in 1997, which contributed to its perceived failure. As a seminal mega-exhibition in South Africa, I consider the influence Trade Routes may have had on subsequent South African curatorial practice and discuss whether Trade Routes may have acted as a catalyst for local curators to consider alternative curatorial methodologies. I argue that South Africa has witnessed a shift towards group, participatory, and community-driven curatorial approaches. I review Portia Malatjie's group curatorial strategy as evidenced in , exhibited in 2012, and the advantages obtained thereby. I discuss how group curatorial strategies subvert the inherited manner of conceptualising, theorising, and organising an exhibition and how this provides opportunities to democratise access and pluralise inclusion. I propose that post-apartheid curatorial practices require caution with regard to valuing one group or individual over another and that collaborative curatorial approaches may foster a method of continuous self-reflection and regulation.","PeriodicalId":40908,"journal":{"name":"De Arte","volume":"56 1","pages":"4 - 28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00043389.2020.1815951","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"De Arte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00043389.2020.1815951","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract In this article, I discuss the perceived failure of the second Johannesburg biennale, Trade Routes: History amd Geography, curated by Okwui Enwezor in 1997. Although curating can be used as a socio-critical tool, Enwezor's authorial curatorial model as witnessed in Trade Routes is criticised for being non-responsive towards issues the South African public was actively dealing with in 1997, which contributed to its perceived failure. As a seminal mega-exhibition in South Africa, I consider the influence Trade Routes may have had on subsequent South African curatorial practice and discuss whether Trade Routes may have acted as a catalyst for local curators to consider alternative curatorial methodologies. I argue that South Africa has witnessed a shift towards group, participatory, and community-driven curatorial approaches. I review Portia Malatjie's group curatorial strategy as evidenced in , exhibited in 2012, and the advantages obtained thereby. I discuss how group curatorial strategies subvert the inherited manner of conceptualising, theorising, and organising an exhibition and how this provides opportunities to democratise access and pluralise inclusion. I propose that post-apartheid curatorial practices require caution with regard to valuing one group or individual over another and that collaborative curatorial approaches may foster a method of continuous self-reflection and regulation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
合作策展:民主包容
摘要在这篇文章中,我讨论了1997年由Okwui Enwezor策划的第二届约翰内斯堡双年展“贸易路线:历史与地理”的失败。尽管策展可以被用作一种社会批判工具,但Enwezor在《贸易路线》中看到的作者策展模式被批评为对南非公众在1997年积极处理的问题没有回应,这导致了其被认为的失败。作为南非一个具有开创性意义的大型展览,我考虑了贸易路线可能对南非随后的策展实践产生的影响,并讨论了贸易路线是否可能成为当地策展人考虑替代策展方法的催化剂。我认为,南非已经见证了向团体、参与和社区驱动的策展方式的转变。我回顾了2012年展出的Portia Malatjie的团体策展策略,以及由此获得的优势。我讨论了团体策展策略如何颠覆传统的概念化、理论化和组织展览的方式,以及这如何为普及和多元包容提供机会。我建议,种族隔离后的策展实践需要谨慎对待一个群体或个人而非另一个群体,合作策展方法可能会培养一种持续自我反思和监管的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
De Arte
De Arte ART-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
The Horizontal Sublime in Post-apartheid Gothic Landscape I’ll Be Your Mirror: Emma Wolukau-Wanambwa’s Science Fiction of Truth DisOrientations: Thinking through Lines of Desire in the Visual Artwork of Jordache A. Ellapen “Africanness” in the Oeuvre of the Ceramist Esias Bosch (1923–2010) Diane Victor: Estampes, Dessins, Suie / Prints, Drawings, Smoke Diane Victor: Estampes, Dessins, Suie / Prints, Drawings, Smoke , With contributions by Stéphane Laurent, Renaud Faroux, Karen von Veh, and Francis van der Riet, Mare et Martin. 2022. pp. 244, ISBN: 9782362220807
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1