Introduction

IF 0.4 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION Studies in Australasian Cinema Pub Date : 2021-09-02 DOI:10.1080/17503175.2021.1993649
G. Hambly, N. Maloney
{"title":"Introduction","authors":"G. Hambly, N. Maloney","doi":"10.1080/17503175.2021.1993649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Welcome to this special issue of Studies in Australasian Cinema on low budget, independent filmmaking inAustralia, a sector that has produced some of themost powerful, recent success stories inAustralian cinema. To cite just two, BenjaminGilmour’s Jirga (2018) was nominated for a Best Foreign Language Film Oscar, and Sophie Hyde’s Berlin and Sundance winner, 52 Tuesdays (2013), garnered global critical acclaim. The low budget sector is noted for bringing new approaches to filmmaking. Unhindered by industry conventions, distributor interventions and screen agency dictates, filmmakers are freer to pursue their passion projects. The sector is an important source of new creative input into the industry. It is also an entry point for new key creatives, cast and crew. All this is well understood, but less well known is the extent and depth of the independent low budget sector in Australia. In 2018, the Australian Academy of Cinema and Television Arts (AACTA) introduced a Best Indie Film Award for films budgeted under $2 million. The point of the award was to shine a ‘brighter spotlight’ on films ‘deserving of greater representation in our industry’ (2018). Indie films comprised almost 50% of all feature films entered in the AACTA awards between 2018 and 2020 (AACTA). As Screen Australia (2020) notes, in the last decade 52% of Australian feature films had budgets of less than $3 million, with 25% produced below $1 million. Given the importance of lowbudgetfilms toAustralian screen culture, it is an appropriate time for a Special Edition that investigates the opportunities and challenges filmmakers face in the pre-production, production and distribution of their films, as well as the impact national funding agency policy and programmes have on their projects. The adventures offered by low budget filmmaking can be exhilarating. Yet, as these articles demonstrate, working in the sector is not for the faint hearted. Behind the heroic narratives that often shape the reception of successful low budget films are sobering stories of financial hardship, production challenges and lack of distribution. Employing case study methodologies and drawing on interviews with producers, directors, screenwriters and actors, the four articles in the issue profile ten low budget Australian feature films produced over the last five years. Building on emerging scholarship in the field, the articles bring together a range of disciplines including creative labour theory, screen, screenwriting and narrative studies. All of the films profiled in these articles are drawn from the AACTA Indie Awards lists, 2018–2020. While they were all made for far less than $2 million, the AACTA Award definition provided a useful means of identifying a group of films for","PeriodicalId":51952,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Australasian Cinema","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Australasian Cinema","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17503175.2021.1993649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Welcome to this special issue of Studies in Australasian Cinema on low budget, independent filmmaking inAustralia, a sector that has produced some of themost powerful, recent success stories inAustralian cinema. To cite just two, BenjaminGilmour’s Jirga (2018) was nominated for a Best Foreign Language Film Oscar, and Sophie Hyde’s Berlin and Sundance winner, 52 Tuesdays (2013), garnered global critical acclaim. The low budget sector is noted for bringing new approaches to filmmaking. Unhindered by industry conventions, distributor interventions and screen agency dictates, filmmakers are freer to pursue their passion projects. The sector is an important source of new creative input into the industry. It is also an entry point for new key creatives, cast and crew. All this is well understood, but less well known is the extent and depth of the independent low budget sector in Australia. In 2018, the Australian Academy of Cinema and Television Arts (AACTA) introduced a Best Indie Film Award for films budgeted under $2 million. The point of the award was to shine a ‘brighter spotlight’ on films ‘deserving of greater representation in our industry’ (2018). Indie films comprised almost 50% of all feature films entered in the AACTA awards between 2018 and 2020 (AACTA). As Screen Australia (2020) notes, in the last decade 52% of Australian feature films had budgets of less than $3 million, with 25% produced below $1 million. Given the importance of lowbudgetfilms toAustralian screen culture, it is an appropriate time for a Special Edition that investigates the opportunities and challenges filmmakers face in the pre-production, production and distribution of their films, as well as the impact national funding agency policy and programmes have on their projects. The adventures offered by low budget filmmaking can be exhilarating. Yet, as these articles demonstrate, working in the sector is not for the faint hearted. Behind the heroic narratives that often shape the reception of successful low budget films are sobering stories of financial hardship, production challenges and lack of distribution. Employing case study methodologies and drawing on interviews with producers, directors, screenwriters and actors, the four articles in the issue profile ten low budget Australian feature films produced over the last five years. Building on emerging scholarship in the field, the articles bring together a range of disciplines including creative labour theory, screen, screenwriting and narrative studies. All of the films profiled in these articles are drawn from the AACTA Indie Awards lists, 2018–2020. While they were all made for far less than $2 million, the AACTA Award definition provided a useful means of identifying a group of films for
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
介绍
欢迎收看本期《澳大利亚电影研究》特刊,内容涉及澳大利亚的低预算独立电影制作,该行业制作了澳大利亚电影中一些最强大、最新的成功故事。仅举两个例子,本杰明·吉尔摩的《支尔格》(2018)获得了奥斯卡最佳外语片提名,索菲·海德的《柏林和圣丹斯52周二》(2013)获得了全球评论界的赞誉。低预算部门以为电影制作带来新方法而闻名。电影制作人不受行业惯例、发行商干预和电影代理机构的约束,可以更自由地追求他们的激情项目。该行业是该行业新创意投入的重要来源。它也是新的关键创意人员、演员和工作人员的切入点。所有这些都是众所周知的,但不太为人所知的是澳大利亚独立低预算部门的范围和深度。2018年,澳大利亚电影电视艺术学院(AACTA)为预算低于200万美元的电影推出了最佳独立电影奖。该奖项的目的是为“值得在我们的行业中有更大代表性”的电影提供“更明亮的聚光灯”(2018)。2018年至2020年间,独立电影几乎占AACTA奖(AACTA)所有故事片的50%。正如Screen Australia(2020)所指出的,在过去十年中,52%的澳大利亚故事片预算低于300万美元,其中25%的制作成本低于100万美元。鉴于低预算电影对澳大利亚银幕文化的重要性,现在是制作特别版的合适时机,该特别版调查电影制作人在电影的前期制作、制作和发行过程中面临的机遇和挑战,以及国家资助机构的政策和计划对其项目的影响。低成本电影制作所带来的冒险可能令人振奋。然而,正如这些文章所表明的那样,在该行业工作并不适合胆小的人。在英雄故事的背后,往往塑造了低成本成功电影的反响,这些故事讲述了财务困难、制作挑战和缺乏发行的发人深省的故事。本期的四篇文章采用案例研究方法,结合对制片人、导演、编剧和演员的采访,介绍了过去五年中制作的十部低成本澳大利亚故事片。在该领域新兴学术的基础上,这些文章汇集了一系列学科,包括创造性劳动理论、银幕、编剧和叙事研究。这些文章中介绍的所有电影都来自2018年至2020年AACTA独立奖名单。虽然它们的制作成本都远低于200万美元,但AACTA奖的定义提供了一种有用的方法来识别一组电影
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Australasian Cinema
Studies in Australasian Cinema FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
By way of North: reorienting the feminine other in Australian film The impacts of ethnic and mainstream culture on Māori-themed films Mad Max and the Western ‘Falling leaves return to their roots’? The reception of Chinese blockbusters by Chinese university students in New Zealand The forgotten history of the Australian film musical: tracking the production and development of the genre in Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1