Maintaining the Magic: Adapting Practice Pedagogies Across Course Modalities

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Teaching in Social Work Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1080/08841233.2022.2120166
N. Kepple, D. Coles
{"title":"Maintaining the Magic: Adapting Practice Pedagogies Across Course Modalities","authors":"N. Kepple, D. Coles","doi":"10.1080/08841233.2022.2120166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Social work programs are facing the need to gain further clarity about how to leverage instructional strategies specific to the course modality (i.e., traditional, hybrid, online hybrid, and fully online). At its heart, this challenge is an analogical transfer problem: practice instructors must adapt what they do in one modality to new modalities through modifying how they guide students to master learning objectives. In doing so, instructors can maintain the essence of what makes a practice course work. The discussion is subsequently shaped around common modalities that programs offer (1) traditional courses; (2) hybrid courses (in-person/online); (3) online hybrid courses (synchronous/asynchronous online); and (4) fully asynchronous online courses. This paper presents an organizing framework that explains pedagogical choices by structures (i.e., space, time, and people) and processes (i.e., interactivity). It then provides examples of how practice instructors can navigate the unique strengths and limitations that simultaneously facilitate and constrain interactions between students and instructors, their peers, and the instructional content. As instructors grapple with the inevitable shifts within the academy, they require specific tools to help them generalize existing skills. The proposed framework is an important first step to help shape and evaluate best practices across and within modalities.","PeriodicalId":51728,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Teaching in Social Work","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Teaching in Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2022.2120166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Social work programs are facing the need to gain further clarity about how to leverage instructional strategies specific to the course modality (i.e., traditional, hybrid, online hybrid, and fully online). At its heart, this challenge is an analogical transfer problem: practice instructors must adapt what they do in one modality to new modalities through modifying how they guide students to master learning objectives. In doing so, instructors can maintain the essence of what makes a practice course work. The discussion is subsequently shaped around common modalities that programs offer (1) traditional courses; (2) hybrid courses (in-person/online); (3) online hybrid courses (synchronous/asynchronous online); and (4) fully asynchronous online courses. This paper presents an organizing framework that explains pedagogical choices by structures (i.e., space, time, and people) and processes (i.e., interactivity). It then provides examples of how practice instructors can navigate the unique strengths and limitations that simultaneously facilitate and constrain interactions between students and instructors, their peers, and the instructional content. As instructors grapple with the inevitable shifts within the academy, they require specific tools to help them generalize existing skills. The proposed framework is an important first step to help shape and evaluate best practices across and within modalities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
保持魔力:跨课程模式调整实践教学法
摘要社会工作项目需要进一步明确如何利用特定于课程模式的教学策略(即传统、混合、在线混合和完全在线)。从本质上讲,这一挑战是一个类比迁移问题:实践教师必须通过修改指导学生掌握学习目标的方式,使他们在一种模式下所做的事情适应新的模式。通过这样做,教师可以保持实践课程的本质。随后围绕课程提供的常见模式展开讨论:(1)传统课程;(2) 混合课程(面对面/在线);(3) 在线混合课程(同步/异步在线);以及(4)完全异步的在线课程。本文提出了一个组织框架,通过结构(即空间、时间和人)和过程(即互动)来解释教学选择。然后,它提供了实践导师如何驾驭独特优势和局限性的例子,这些优势和局限同时促进和限制了学生和导师、他们的同龄人以及教学内容之间的互动。当导师们努力应对学院内部不可避免的转变时,他们需要特定的工具来帮助他们概括现有的技能。拟议的框架是帮助制定和评估各种模式及其内部最佳做法的重要第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Teaching in Social Work
Journal of Teaching in Social Work EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The Journal of Teaching in Social Work fills a long-standing gap in the social work literature by providing opportunities for creative and able teachers—in schools, agency-based training programs, and direct practice—to share with their colleagues what experience and systematic study has taught them about successful teaching. Through articles focusing on the teacher, the teaching process, and new contexts of teaching, the journal is an essential forum for teaching and learning processes and the factors affecting their quality. The journal recognizes that all social work practitioners who wish to teach (whatever their specialty) should know the philosophies of teaching and learning as well as educational methods and techniques.
期刊最新文献
Anti-Racism, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Perspectives Across the Explicit Curriculum: Insights and Efforts from a School of Social Work Suicide Prevention Training for Social Work Students in Rural Practicum Placements: Current Opportunities and Areas for Growth The Moral Conundrum of Reproductive Justice in Social Work Indicators of Wellness Among Social Work Students within an Urban Setting During Times of Crisis Teaching Social Justice After the Dobbs Decision
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1