Ancient Burial Mounds as a Symbolic System

IF 0.3 4区 历史学 N/A ARCHAEOLOGY ARCHAEOLOGY Pub Date : 2021-03-16 DOI:10.15407/ARCHAEOLOGYUA2021.01.017
S. Ivanova
{"title":"Ancient Burial Mounds as a Symbolic System","authors":"S. Ivanova","doi":"10.15407/ARCHAEOLOGYUA2021.01.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Analysis of early dates and stratigraphy of burial mound complexes (the second half of the V millennium BC) led to the conclusion, that they are not directly related to the burial embankment, but relate to complex monumental structures — sanctuaries. The sanctuaries preceded the burial mounds in chronological aspect, and they functioned for a long time without creating an embankment above them. The part of sanctuaries had astronomical reference points and were connected to calendar-zodiac symbolism. Sometimes burials were carried out on the territory of sanctuaries; these burials had sacral nature. These were flat burials and the mound above them were not erected. Burial mounds above the sanctuaries began to appear after burials of later epochs were carried out in sacral places (not earlier than 38/37 BC.). These mounds erroneously are associated with flat burials or ground sanctuaries. The dating of burial mounds by the dating of sacral flat burials (or by the dating of «pillar sanctuaries») mistakenly depreciated the dating of appearance of the first mounds in the Steppe Black Sea region and Transcaucasia. The separation of these complexes in time and space (the flat ground sanctuary and the burial mound itself) allowed drawing conclusions about the existence of this sanctuaries in 45—40 BC. The burial mounds appear later, their installation in the place of sanctuaries is connected with the sacral nature of the place. Throughout Europe, barrows appear almost simultaneously, in 38/37 BC, although in different cultures. It is possible to assume the Central European and Lower Danube influence on the formation of ideological ideas of the Steppe population. In particular, the phenomenon of sanctuaries of the Middle Eneolithic may have originated under Central European influence. It obviously had structural similarities with other complexes built in accordance with the movement of the celestial luminaries in the late Neolithic of Central and Atlantic Europe. The appearance of sanctuaries can be attributed to the circle of archaeological evidence of the interaction between the world of early farmers of Southeast and Central Europe and the \"steppe\" world of the pastoralists. The barrows of the Black Sea and Caucasian steppe are synchronous with European burial mounds, and their ancientization and equation with the dating of sanctuaries is erroneous.","PeriodicalId":46362,"journal":{"name":"ARCHAEOLOGY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1090","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15407/ARCHAEOLOGYUA2021.01.017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Analysis of early dates and stratigraphy of burial mound complexes (the second half of the V millennium BC) led to the conclusion, that they are not directly related to the burial embankment, but relate to complex monumental structures — sanctuaries. The sanctuaries preceded the burial mounds in chronological aspect, and they functioned for a long time without creating an embankment above them. The part of sanctuaries had astronomical reference points and were connected to calendar-zodiac symbolism. Sometimes burials were carried out on the territory of sanctuaries; these burials had sacral nature. These were flat burials and the mound above them were not erected. Burial mounds above the sanctuaries began to appear after burials of later epochs were carried out in sacral places (not earlier than 38/37 BC.). These mounds erroneously are associated with flat burials or ground sanctuaries. The dating of burial mounds by the dating of sacral flat burials (or by the dating of «pillar sanctuaries») mistakenly depreciated the dating of appearance of the first mounds in the Steppe Black Sea region and Transcaucasia. The separation of these complexes in time and space (the flat ground sanctuary and the burial mound itself) allowed drawing conclusions about the existence of this sanctuaries in 45—40 BC. The burial mounds appear later, their installation in the place of sanctuaries is connected with the sacral nature of the place. Throughout Europe, barrows appear almost simultaneously, in 38/37 BC, although in different cultures. It is possible to assume the Central European and Lower Danube influence on the formation of ideological ideas of the Steppe population. In particular, the phenomenon of sanctuaries of the Middle Eneolithic may have originated under Central European influence. It obviously had structural similarities with other complexes built in accordance with the movement of the celestial luminaries in the late Neolithic of Central and Atlantic Europe. The appearance of sanctuaries can be attributed to the circle of archaeological evidence of the interaction between the world of early farmers of Southeast and Central Europe and the "steppe" world of the pastoralists. The barrows of the Black Sea and Caucasian steppe are synchronous with European burial mounds, and their ancientization and equation with the dating of sanctuaries is erroneous.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为象征系统的古代墓地
对土丘复合体(公元前5千年后半期)的早期日期和地层学的分析得出结论,它们与土堤没有直接关系,而是与复杂的纪念性结构——避难所有关。从时间上看,这些避难所早于土堆,它们在很长一段时间内都没有在上面建造堤坝。圣地的一部分有天文参考点,与黄道十二宫的象征意义有关。有时在圣地的领土上进行埋葬;这些墓葬具有骶骨性质。这些都是平葬,上面的土堆没有竖立起来。圣地上方的土堆是在后来的时代在骶骨处进行埋葬后(不早于公元前38/37年)开始出现的。这些土堆被错误地与平葬或地面圣地联系在一起。通过骶骨平葬的年代测定(或通过“支柱避难所”的年代测定)对土墩的年代测定错误地贬低了草原黑海地区和外高加索地区第一批土墩的外观年代测定。这些建筑群在时间和空间上的分离(平地避难所和土堆本身)使人们能够在公元前45-40年得出关于这些避难所存在的结论。土墩的出现较晚,它们在圣地的安装与该地的骶骨性质有关。在整个欧洲,手推车几乎同时出现,在公元前38/37年,尽管在不同的文化中。可以假定中欧和多瑙河下游对草原人口思想观念形成的影响。特别是,中风化层的避难所现象可能起源于中欧的影响。它显然与中欧和大西洋新石器时代晚期根据天体亮度运动建造的其他综合体在结构上有相似之处。保护区的出现可以归因于东南欧和中欧早期农民的世界与牧民的“草原”世界之间互动的考古证据圈。黑海和高加索草原的手推车与欧洲的土堆是同步的,它们的古老性和与保护区年代的等式是错误的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ARCHAEOLOGY
ARCHAEOLOGY ARCHAEOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Final Palaeolithic of Zhytomyr Polissia New Hypothesized Musical Instruments of the European Neolithic The Marble Bust of Mithras Tauroctone from Olbia Coins from the “Orient” Excavation Site of the Olbian Necropolis Finds of Lithospermum Nuts at Archaeological Sites in Ukraine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1