Nonconventional menstrual hygiene products and its usage among reproductive age group women in India – A cross-sectional study

D. R. Britto, N. George, Abdul Shagirunisha Rizvana, Josephin Shalini Ratchagar, Tamilarasan Muniyapillai, K. Kulothungan
{"title":"Nonconventional menstrual hygiene products and its usage among reproductive age group women in India – A cross-sectional study","authors":"D. R. Britto, N. George, Abdul Shagirunisha Rizvana, Josephin Shalini Ratchagar, Tamilarasan Muniyapillai, K. Kulothungan","doi":"10.4103/jdmimsu.jdmimsu_388_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Menstrual hygiene is influenced by various factors including the products used by women during the cycle. The up-to-date and recent products like menstrual cups and tampons make women more comfortable during the day. The study aimed to assess the perception of usage and awareness of women in the reproductive age group regarding nonconventional menstrual hygiene products such as tampons and cups. Methodology: This was a cross-sectional study done among 525 subjects belonging to reproductive age group. The data was collected through questionnaires circulated in the form of Google forms. The questionnaire contained general socio-demographic details, menstrual history details, and the details regarding the usage of sanitary pads its difficulties and the use of menstrual cups or tampons and its advantages. The data were analyzed using various appropriate statistical tests. Results: Among the study subjects, 445 (84.8%) are aware that menstrual cups or tampons are present as an alternative to sanitary pads. In this study, 489 (93.1%) have never tried tampons or menstrual cups during menstrual cycles. The most common reason for not trying menstrual cups or tampons among these subjects is as follows: afraid to insert foreign body 190 (38.9%). The study showed that 489 (93.15%), 13 (2.5%), and 23 (4.4%) subjects were currently using sanitary pads, tampons, and menstrual cups respectively. Conclusion: The study showed that the use of nonconventional sanitary products like menstrual cups or tampons was less among the study group even with high awareness. The need of right path about the appropriate and fitting menstrual hygiene product for the generation is portrayed.","PeriodicalId":15592,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences University","volume":"18 1","pages":"357 - 363"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jdmimsu.jdmimsu_388_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Menstrual hygiene is influenced by various factors including the products used by women during the cycle. The up-to-date and recent products like menstrual cups and tampons make women more comfortable during the day. The study aimed to assess the perception of usage and awareness of women in the reproductive age group regarding nonconventional menstrual hygiene products such as tampons and cups. Methodology: This was a cross-sectional study done among 525 subjects belonging to reproductive age group. The data was collected through questionnaires circulated in the form of Google forms. The questionnaire contained general socio-demographic details, menstrual history details, and the details regarding the usage of sanitary pads its difficulties and the use of menstrual cups or tampons and its advantages. The data were analyzed using various appropriate statistical tests. Results: Among the study subjects, 445 (84.8%) are aware that menstrual cups or tampons are present as an alternative to sanitary pads. In this study, 489 (93.1%) have never tried tampons or menstrual cups during menstrual cycles. The most common reason for not trying menstrual cups or tampons among these subjects is as follows: afraid to insert foreign body 190 (38.9%). The study showed that 489 (93.15%), 13 (2.5%), and 23 (4.4%) subjects were currently using sanitary pads, tampons, and menstrual cups respectively. Conclusion: The study showed that the use of nonconventional sanitary products like menstrual cups or tampons was less among the study group even with high awareness. The need of right path about the appropriate and fitting menstrual hygiene product for the generation is portrayed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非常规月经卫生用品及其在印度育龄妇女中的使用——一项横断面研究
背景:月经卫生受到各种因素的影响,包括女性在月经周期中使用的产品。月经杯和卫生棉条等最新产品使女性在白天更加舒适。这项研究旨在评估育龄妇女对卫生棉条和杯子等非传统月经卫生用品的使用感受和意识。方法:这是一项横断面研究,涉及525名育龄人群。这些数据是通过以谷歌表格形式分发的问卷收集的。问卷包括一般的社会人口统计细节、月经史细节、卫生巾使用细节——它的困难、月经杯或卫生棉条的使用及其优点。使用各种适当的统计检验对数据进行分析。结果:在研究对象中,445人(84.8%)知道月经杯或卫生棉条是卫生巾的替代品。在这项研究中,489人(93.1%)在月经周期内从未尝试过卫生棉条或月经杯。在这些受试者中,不尝试月经杯或卫生棉条的最常见原因如下:害怕插入异物190(38.9%)。研究显示,489名(93.15%)、13名(2.5%)和23名(4.4%)受试者目前分别使用卫生巾、卫生棉条和月经杯。结论:研究表明,即使意识很高,研究组也很少使用月经杯或卫生棉条等非常规卫生用品。描述了为这一代人提供合适和合适的月经卫生产品的正确途径的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
Academic to AI-cademic: Challenges and Recommendations of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Writing Manoeuvring distal tibial shaft fractures with Ender's nailing: Case series Effect of palliative care communication on knowledge and attitude among caregivers of cancer patients The effect of toothbrushing duration on plaque removal: A randomized crossover trial Amelioration of pathological tooth migration by surgical periodontal therapy alone: A stupendous clinical case report with two year follow up
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1