Buy, Sell, or…Hold That Thought: The Impact of Task Interruption on Investor Decision-Making

IF 0.7 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE Behavioral Research in Accounting Pub Date : 2023-07-24 DOI:10.2308/bria-2022-020
K. A. Basoglu, James H. Long
{"title":"Buy, Sell, or…Hold That Thought: The Impact of Task Interruption on Investor Decision-Making","authors":"K. A. Basoglu, James H. Long","doi":"10.2308/bria-2022-020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Task interruptions are ubiquitous and can systematically affect decision-making, even when they are nondiagnostic and thus irrelevant. We report the results of an experiment employing experienced investors as participants to solidify the theoretical foundation underpinning the impact of interruption on investor decision-making. We consider the joint effects of interruption and risk/return preferences on experienced investor decision-making, as well as the effectiveness of two theory-driven mitigating strategies. Consistent with the expanded Goal-Based Choice (GBC) Model, but, inconsistent with other theoretical explanations proposed to date, we provide evidence that interruption exacerbates the influence of risk/return preferences on investment decisions and that a mitigating strategy derived from the expanded GBC Model effectively eliminates this effect. Overall, the expanded GBC Model provides the best theoretical explanation for these phenomena, enhancing our understanding of the underlying mechanisms and the generalizability of prior research.\n JEL Classifications: M40; M41.","PeriodicalId":46356,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Research in Accounting","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Research in Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-2022-020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Task interruptions are ubiquitous and can systematically affect decision-making, even when they are nondiagnostic and thus irrelevant. We report the results of an experiment employing experienced investors as participants to solidify the theoretical foundation underpinning the impact of interruption on investor decision-making. We consider the joint effects of interruption and risk/return preferences on experienced investor decision-making, as well as the effectiveness of two theory-driven mitigating strategies. Consistent with the expanded Goal-Based Choice (GBC) Model, but, inconsistent with other theoretical explanations proposed to date, we provide evidence that interruption exacerbates the influence of risk/return preferences on investment decisions and that a mitigating strategy derived from the expanded GBC Model effectively eliminates this effect. Overall, the expanded GBC Model provides the best theoretical explanation for these phenomena, enhancing our understanding of the underlying mechanisms and the generalizability of prior research. JEL Classifications: M40; M41.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
买入、卖出或…持有这种想法:任务中断对投资者决策的影响
任务中断是普遍存在的,并且可以系统地影响决策,即使它们是非诊断性的,因此是不相关的。我们报告了一项实验的结果,该实验聘请了经验丰富的投资者作为参与者,以巩固中断对投资者决策影响的理论基础。我们考虑了中断和风险/回报偏好对经验丰富的投资者决策的联合影响,以及两种理论驱动的缓解策略的有效性。与扩展的基于目标的选择(GBC)模型一致,但与迄今为止提出的其他理论解释不一致,我们提供的证据表明,中断加剧了风险/回报偏好对投资决策的影响,并且从扩展的GBC模型衍生的缓解策略有效地消除了这种影响。总的来说,扩展的GBC模型为这些现象提供了最好的理论解释,增强了我们对潜在机制的理解和先前研究的可推广性。JEL分类:M40;M41。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Audit Committee Strength on the Influence of Management Team Likeability Seeing the Trees: How a Concrete versus Abstract Mindset Improves Performance on Low-Level Assurance Tasks Preliminary Evidence on the Impact of the Felt Presence of Peers on Auditor Skeptical Judgment and Action in a Remote Work Setting Why Do Investors Rely on Low-Quality Investment Advice? Experimental Evidence from Social Media Platforms Strategic Bias in Team Members’ Communication about Relative Contributions: The Effects of Voluntary Communication and Explanation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1