{"title":"Theorizing and implementing meaningful Indigenization: Wikipedia as an opportunity for course-based digital advocacy","authors":"N. Lugosi, Nicole Patrie, Kris Cromwell","doi":"10.1080/17508487.2022.2074489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article is inspired by long-standing calls to address issues of anti-Indigenous racism and colonialism within higher education. There is a growing trend among universities around the globe to commit to principles of equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI), including discussions about how to Indigenize the academy. While EDI and Indigenization goals are laudable, they are often critiqued as superficial policies that fail to disrupt the status quo of everyday racism and colonialism embedded within academic institutions. In response, we contend that scholars must carefully think through the concept of Indigenization guided by critical Indigenous theories to ensure meaningful application over performative inaction. Critical Indigenous theory grounds our analysis and reflections of using Wikipedia in the higher education classroom. We illustrate how Wikipedia can be used in the classroom as a site of digital advocacy to foster meaningful and sustainable change that aligns with the tenets of critical Indigenous theories, such as Indigenous storywork, resisting damage, and resurgence-based decolonial Indigenization. Our contribution showcases how implementing Wikipedia is one pedagogical strategy that can be implemented to challenge the status quo of knowledge production within and beyond academia.","PeriodicalId":47434,"journal":{"name":"Critical Studies in Education","volume":"64 1","pages":"201 - 217"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Studies in Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2022.2074489","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT This article is inspired by long-standing calls to address issues of anti-Indigenous racism and colonialism within higher education. There is a growing trend among universities around the globe to commit to principles of equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI), including discussions about how to Indigenize the academy. While EDI and Indigenization goals are laudable, they are often critiqued as superficial policies that fail to disrupt the status quo of everyday racism and colonialism embedded within academic institutions. In response, we contend that scholars must carefully think through the concept of Indigenization guided by critical Indigenous theories to ensure meaningful application over performative inaction. Critical Indigenous theory grounds our analysis and reflections of using Wikipedia in the higher education classroom. We illustrate how Wikipedia can be used in the classroom as a site of digital advocacy to foster meaningful and sustainable change that aligns with the tenets of critical Indigenous theories, such as Indigenous storywork, resisting damage, and resurgence-based decolonial Indigenization. Our contribution showcases how implementing Wikipedia is one pedagogical strategy that can be implemented to challenge the status quo of knowledge production within and beyond academia.
期刊介绍:
Critical Studies in Education is one of the few international journals devoted to a critical sociology of education, although it welcomes submissions with a critical stance that draw on other disciplines (e.g. philosophy, social geography, history) in order to understand ''the social''. Two interests frame the journal’s critical approach to research: (1) who benefits (and who does not) from current and historical social arrangements in education and, (2) from the standpoint of the least advantaged, what can be done about inequitable arrangements. Informed by this approach, articles published in the journal draw on post-structural, feminist, postcolonial and other critical orientations to critique education systems and to identify alternatives for education policy, practice and research.