The Decision-Making Process of China's Human Spaceflight Program

IF 2 4区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Space Policy Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.spacepol.2022.101492
Chengzhi Li , Bingtao Ma , Xiang Li
{"title":"The Decision-Making Process of China's Human Spaceflight Program","authors":"Chengzhi Li ,&nbsp;Bingtao Ma ,&nbsp;Xiang Li","doi":"10.1016/j.spacepol.2022.101492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article thoroughly examines the decision-making processes involved in the revival of China's human spaceflight program and debates over whether China's space program should begin with the development of a human space capsule or space shuttle. The authors discuss high-level decision-makers’ attitudes toward human spaceflight, the Chinese government's emphasis on preliminary research on human space programs and achieving technological catch-up with other countries, debates over whether space shuttles or human spacecrafts should be prioritized, and the final decision-making process of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China (CPC) regarding the implementation of the human space program. In the light of the development of space shuttles in the United States and the Soviet Union and the progress of multiple reusable space shuttles and spaceplanes projects in Europe, a considerable number of experts and involved institutions in China have suggested prioritizing the development of space shuttles. Considering China's current situation, time and cost factors, level of technological advancement, and the difficulty of the task, a final proposal for developing a disposable human space capsule was submitted by China's Commission of Science, Technology, and Industry for National Defense (COSTIND) and the Ministry of Space Industry. In 1992, the Central Committee officially approved a three-step strategy for China's human spaceflight program. In the subsequent long-term operation, the US space shuttle failed to meet the expected goals, such as cost-effectiveness, safety, and flexibility of use, which could justify China's decision to prioritize the development of human spaceflight.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45924,"journal":{"name":"Space Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Space Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0265964622000182","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article thoroughly examines the decision-making processes involved in the revival of China's human spaceflight program and debates over whether China's space program should begin with the development of a human space capsule or space shuttle. The authors discuss high-level decision-makers’ attitudes toward human spaceflight, the Chinese government's emphasis on preliminary research on human space programs and achieving technological catch-up with other countries, debates over whether space shuttles or human spacecrafts should be prioritized, and the final decision-making process of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China (CPC) regarding the implementation of the human space program. In the light of the development of space shuttles in the United States and the Soviet Union and the progress of multiple reusable space shuttles and spaceplanes projects in Europe, a considerable number of experts and involved institutions in China have suggested prioritizing the development of space shuttles. Considering China's current situation, time and cost factors, level of technological advancement, and the difficulty of the task, a final proposal for developing a disposable human space capsule was submitted by China's Commission of Science, Technology, and Industry for National Defense (COSTIND) and the Ministry of Space Industry. In 1992, the Central Committee officially approved a three-step strategy for China's human spaceflight program. In the subsequent long-term operation, the US space shuttle failed to meet the expected goals, such as cost-effectiveness, safety, and flexibility of use, which could justify China's decision to prioritize the development of human spaceflight.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国载人航天工程的决策过程
本文深入探讨了中国载人航天计划复兴的决策过程,以及中国太空计划是否应该从开发载人太空舱或航天飞机开始的争论。作者讨论了高层决策者对载人航天的态度,中国政府对载人航天计划的初步研究和实现技术追赶的重视,关于航天飞机还是载人飞船应该优先考虑的争论,以及中共中央委员会关于实施载人航天计划的最终决策过程。鉴于美国和苏联航天飞机的发展以及欧洲多个可重复使用航天飞机和航天飞机项目的进展,中国有相当多的专家和有关机构建议优先发展航天飞机。考虑到中国的现状、时间和成本因素、技术进步水平以及任务难度,中国国防科学技术工业委员会(COSTIND)和航天工业部提交了开发一次性载人太空舱的最终方案。1992年,中央委员会正式批准了中国载人航天计划的三步走战略。在随后的长期运行中,美国航天飞机未能达到预期的目标,如成本效益、安全性和使用灵活性,这可能证明中国决定优先发展载人航天。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Space Policy
Space Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
36.40%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Space Policy is an international, interdisciplinary journal which draws on the fields of international relations, economics, history, aerospace studies, security studies, development studies, political science and ethics to provide discussion and analysis of space activities in their political, economic, industrial, legal, cultural and social contexts. Alongside full-length papers, which are subject to a double-blind peer review system, the journal publishes opinion pieces, case studies and short reports and, in so doing, it aims to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas and opinions and a means by which authors can alert policy makers and international organizations to their views. Space Policy is also a journal of record, reproducing, in whole or part, official documents such as treaties, space agency plans or government reports relevant to the space community. Views expressed in the journal are not necessarily those of the editors or members of the editorial board.
期刊最新文献
Developing safety-zone rules: Based on an institutional choice framework Bringing space solution to national needs through selected projects: The case of Greece Preliminary investigation and proposal of periodic orbits and their utilization for logistics in the cislunar regime Finding space for the European Space Agency Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1