Topic Familiarity and Genre Familiarity: Which One Contributes More to Listening Comprehension?

Ririn Ovilia, Ainul Addinna
{"title":"Topic Familiarity and Genre Familiarity: Which One Contributes More to Listening Comprehension?","authors":"Ririn Ovilia, Ainul Addinna","doi":"10.24036/ld.v14i2.108328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The role of prior knowledge has been acknowledged in realm of English Language Teaching, including teaching Listening. Due to the profound role of prior knowledge, experts and practitioners compromise that the first step of teaching listening is building the students’ prior knowledge. However, there is dilemma which background knowledge has the strongest relationship to students’ listening comprehension, either content schemata (Topic Familiarity) or formal schemata (Genre Familiarity). Therefore, this study aimed at investigating the relationship and contribution of topic and genre familiarity to listening comprehension and eventually determining the better predictor of listening comprehension. Furthermore, fourth semester ELT students at Universitas Negeri Malang who were taking advance listening course participated as the subjects in this study. The findings of this study revealed that the contribution of topic familiarity was significantly higher than genre familiarity. This result also pointed out that topic familiarity was better predictor of listening comprehension.","PeriodicalId":53030,"journal":{"name":"Lingua Didaktika Jurnal Bahasa dan Pembelajaran Bahasa","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lingua Didaktika Jurnal Bahasa dan Pembelajaran Bahasa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24036/ld.v14i2.108328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The role of prior knowledge has been acknowledged in realm of English Language Teaching, including teaching Listening. Due to the profound role of prior knowledge, experts and practitioners compromise that the first step of teaching listening is building the students’ prior knowledge. However, there is dilemma which background knowledge has the strongest relationship to students’ listening comprehension, either content schemata (Topic Familiarity) or formal schemata (Genre Familiarity). Therefore, this study aimed at investigating the relationship and contribution of topic and genre familiarity to listening comprehension and eventually determining the better predictor of listening comprehension. Furthermore, fourth semester ELT students at Universitas Negeri Malang who were taking advance listening course participated as the subjects in this study. The findings of this study revealed that the contribution of topic familiarity was significantly higher than genre familiarity. This result also pointed out that topic familiarity was better predictor of listening comprehension.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
话题熟悉度和体裁熟悉度:哪一个对听力理解的贡献更大?
先验知识在包括听力教学在内的英语教学领域中的作用已得到公认。由于先验知识的深刻作用,专家和从业者一致认为,听力教学的第一步是培养学生的先验知识。然而,无论是内容图式(主题熟悉度)还是形式图式(流派熟悉度),背景知识与学生听力理解的关系最为密切,都存在着两难的问题。因此,本研究旨在调查主题和体裁熟悉度对听力理解的关系和贡献,并最终确定更好的听力理解预测因子。此外,马朗内格里大学第四学期的英语教学学生也参加了这项研究。研究结果表明,主题熟悉度的贡献显著高于类型熟悉度。这一结果也表明,话题熟悉度是听力理解的较好预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Social-cultural, psychological, linguistic, and world knowledge; EFL students' voices on their speaking difficulties in the border area of Indonesia EFL Students’ Experiences on Transactional Speaking Projects Power of Translation of QS. Al-Mâ’idah 51 on the Conservative Islamic Website in Indonesia Video Blog to Boost Young Learners' Speaking Skill EFL Students' Speaking Anxiety in Indonesian Senior High School
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1