Physicians’ Sense of Responsibility During the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Binary Logistic Model

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 Medicine Romanian Journal of Legal Medicine Pub Date : 2022-01-10 DOI:10.4323/rjlm.2022.60
T. Rotaru, D. Iliescu, L. Oprea
{"title":"Physicians’ Sense of Responsibility During the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Binary Logistic Model","authors":"T. Rotaru, D. Iliescu, L. Oprea","doi":"10.4323/rjlm.2022.60","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. During a pandemic, doctors are or are not willing to work due to numerous factors. Studies have shown that doctors tend to prioritize their own safety and the safety of their families. Objective. We have built a profile for doctors who prioritize their own safety and the safety of their families during a pandemic. Method. A total of 1285 Romanian doctors completed an online survey belonging to a larger study. We used a logistical binary regression to build a profile for doctors who consider their own safety and the safety of their families as having priority. All the participants responded, among other things, to an item about responsibility. We performed Backward-Wald computations to determine the best predictors. Results. We reached seven predictors that could differentiate between respondents who tended to agree with the responsibility statement and those who tended to disagree. The Cox and Snell pseudo R2 coefficient were.11. The predictors referred to: leaving the job to protect family, transportation, new job responsibilities, necessity of wage, needing to contribute, abandoning patients and working in a different hospital. Conclusion. The results show that doctors are not necessarily aligned with the theoretical “duty to care”. Those who prioritize safety for themselves and for their families seem to feel strongly about a hierarchy of values they have. For these doctors, institutional responsibility might take precedence with respect to patients, so they do not feel a sense of abandoning their patients if they don’t show up to work.","PeriodicalId":54450,"journal":{"name":"Romanian Journal of Legal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian Journal of Legal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4323/rjlm.2022.60","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. During a pandemic, doctors are or are not willing to work due to numerous factors. Studies have shown that doctors tend to prioritize their own safety and the safety of their families. Objective. We have built a profile for doctors who prioritize their own safety and the safety of their families during a pandemic. Method. A total of 1285 Romanian doctors completed an online survey belonging to a larger study. We used a logistical binary regression to build a profile for doctors who consider their own safety and the safety of their families as having priority. All the participants responded, among other things, to an item about responsibility. We performed Backward-Wald computations to determine the best predictors. Results. We reached seven predictors that could differentiate between respondents who tended to agree with the responsibility statement and those who tended to disagree. The Cox and Snell pseudo R2 coefficient were.11. The predictors referred to: leaving the job to protect family, transportation, new job responsibilities, necessity of wage, needing to contribute, abandoning patients and working in a different hospital. Conclusion. The results show that doctors are not necessarily aligned with the theoretical “duty to care”. Those who prioritize safety for themselves and for their families seem to feel strongly about a hierarchy of values they have. For these doctors, institutional responsibility might take precedence with respect to patients, so they do not feel a sense of abandoning their patients if they don’t show up to work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎大流行期间医生的责任感:二元逻辑模型
介绍在疫情期间,由于多种因素,医生愿意或不愿意工作。研究表明,医生往往会优先考虑自己和家人的安全。客观的我们为那些在疫情期间优先考虑自身和家人安全的医生建立了一个形象。方法共有1285名罗马尼亚医生完成了一项大型研究的在线调查。我们使用逻辑二元回归为那些认为自己和家人的安全是首要任务的医生建立了一个档案。除其他外,所有与会者都对一个关于责任的项目作出了回应。我们进行了反向Wald计算,以确定最佳预测因子。后果我们得出了七个预测因素,可以区分倾向于同意责任声明的受访者和倾向于不同意的受访者。Cox和Snell伪R2系数分别为.11。预测因素包括:离职保护家庭、交通、新的工作责任、工资的必要性、需要贡献、抛弃病人和在不同的医院工作。结论研究结果表明,医生不一定与理论上的“照顾义务”一致。那些把安全放在自己和家人首位的人似乎对自己的价值观有着强烈的感受。对于这些医生来说,机构责任可能优先于患者,因此如果他们不上班,他们就不会有抛弃患者的感觉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Romanian Journal of Legal Medicine, the official publication of the Romanian Legal Medicine Society, is devoted to the publication of the original investigations, observations, scholarly inquiries and reviews in the various branches of the forensic sciences. These include forensic pathology and histochemistry, clinical forensic medicine, medical malpractice, traffic medicine, chemistry, biochemistry, thanatochemistry, clinical and forensic toxicology, alcohology, biology (including the identification of hairs and fibres), the physical sciences, firearms, and document examination, physical anthropology, serology, forensic genetics and paternity (with special emphasis on recent advances in DNA technology and PCR), forensic psychiatry and behavioral sciences, forensic odontology, law and ethics, history of forensic sciences. RJLM also includes similar submissions dealing with forensic-oriented aspects of the social science and the area where science and medicine interact with the law.
期刊最新文献
Forensic Aspects of Skydiving -Related Deaths and Injuries Assessment of Posttraumatic Bodily Injury in Road Accidents – Legal and Medico – Legal Criteria The Medico-Legal Examination of the Male Aggressor in Rape Cases Cruelty to Animals - An Abusive Human - Animal Relationship. Case Study - Romania The Applicability and Usefulness of Knowing the Types of Medical Liability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1