Evaluation of diagnostic value of laboratory tests (CRP, WBC and ESR) in patients with COVID-19 in Shahid Sadoughi Hospital, Yazd

Soheila Azimi Abarghouei, Zohre Akhondimeybodi, J. Ayatollahi, Mohammad Sharif Yazdi, S. Mousavi, F. Najjar, Sara Jambersang, Samaneh Mazidi Sharafabadi, Mahdie Hamidfar, S. Shahcheraghi
{"title":"Evaluation of diagnostic value of laboratory tests (CRP, WBC and ESR) in patients with COVID-19 in Shahid Sadoughi Hospital, Yazd","authors":"Soheila Azimi Abarghouei, Zohre Akhondimeybodi, J. Ayatollahi, Mohammad Sharif Yazdi, S. Mousavi, F. Najjar, Sara Jambersang, Samaneh Mazidi Sharafabadi, Mahdie Hamidfar, S. Shahcheraghi","doi":"10.31254/jmr.2022.8403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"COVID-19 disease is spreading rapidly around the world and its control requires proper diagnosis of infected people. RTPCR is the primary method of laboratory diagnosis of COVID-19, but is associated with false-positive cases. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of laboratory tests (CRP, WBC and ESR) in the diagnosis of COVID-19. In a cross-sectional and descriptive-analytical study, the file of 200 patients with COVID-19 admitted to Shahid Sadoughi Hospital in Yazd in 2020-2021was evaluated and the results of laboratory tests (CRP, WBC and ESR) were recorded. Considering RT-PCR and lung CT scan as the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of each test were determined. Data were analyzed using SPSS software. The frequency of positive findings of CT scan, RT-PCR and gold standard in the studied patients were 83.5%, 50% and 91%, respectively. The mean WBC of patients was 109 2.17 and the ESR was 43.79 mm / h. CRP test was also positive in 71.3% of patients. The sensitivity and specificity of WBC, ESR and CRP in the detection of COVID-19 were 31.5%, 62.4% and 73.1%, respectively, and their specificity was 63.6%, 22.2% and 42.1%, respectively. The frequency of CRP, WBC and ESR findings was not significantly different from the gold standard findings in the studied patients (P> 0.05). CRP test is more sensitive than ESR and WBC in diagnosing COVID-19 and can be used in screening patients.","PeriodicalId":50132,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31254/jmr.2022.8403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

COVID-19 disease is spreading rapidly around the world and its control requires proper diagnosis of infected people. RTPCR is the primary method of laboratory diagnosis of COVID-19, but is associated with false-positive cases. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of laboratory tests (CRP, WBC and ESR) in the diagnosis of COVID-19. In a cross-sectional and descriptive-analytical study, the file of 200 patients with COVID-19 admitted to Shahid Sadoughi Hospital in Yazd in 2020-2021was evaluated and the results of laboratory tests (CRP, WBC and ESR) were recorded. Considering RT-PCR and lung CT scan as the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of each test were determined. Data were analyzed using SPSS software. The frequency of positive findings of CT scan, RT-PCR and gold standard in the studied patients were 83.5%, 50% and 91%, respectively. The mean WBC of patients was 109 2.17 and the ESR was 43.79 mm / h. CRP test was also positive in 71.3% of patients. The sensitivity and specificity of WBC, ESR and CRP in the detection of COVID-19 were 31.5%, 62.4% and 73.1%, respectively, and their specificity was 63.6%, 22.2% and 42.1%, respectively. The frequency of CRP, WBC and ESR findings was not significantly different from the gold standard findings in the studied patients (P> 0.05). CRP test is more sensitive than ESR and WBC in diagnosing COVID-19 and can be used in screening patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亚兹德Shahid Sadoughi医院实验室检测(CRP、WBC和ESR)对新冠肺炎患者的诊断价值评估
新冠肺炎疾病正在世界各地迅速传播,其控制需要对感染者进行正确诊断。RTPCR是新冠肺炎实验室诊断的主要方法,但与假阳性病例有关。因此,本研究的目的是评估实验室检测(CRP、WBC和ESR)对新冠肺炎的诊断价值。在一项横断面和描述性分析研究中,对2020-2021年亚兹德Shahid Sadoughi医院收治的200名新冠肺炎患者的档案进行了评估,并记录了实验室检测结果(CRP、WBC和ESR)。以RT-PCR和肺部CT扫描为金标准,测定各项检测的敏感性和特异性。使用SPSS软件对数据进行分析。研究患者的CT扫描、RT-PCR和金标阳性率分别为83.5%、50%和91%。患者的平均WBC为1092.17,ESR为43.79mm/h。71.3%的患者CRP检测也呈阳性。WBC、ESR和CRP检测新冠肺炎的敏感性和特异性分别为31.5%、62.4%和73.1%,特异性分别是63.6%、22.2%和42.1%。研究患者的CRP、WBC和ESR检查结果与金标准检查结果无显著差异(P>0.05)。在诊断新冠肺炎时,CRP检测比ESR和WBC更敏感,可用于筛查患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessing Influenza Vaccine Adherence Among Pregnant Women: A Health Center-Based Study in Qatar Micronodular thymic carcinoma with lymphoid hyperplasia : A case report and review of the literature Long-term Clean Intermittent Catheterization Users’ Experience and Practical Barriers: A Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-synthesis Whether serum albumin/leukocyte ratio combined with Go-FAR score more accurately predicts the neurological outcome of patients who suffered cardiac arrest Creation of a oblique colon valve: a new methods to wake up the stem cell of colon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1