Medial and Lateral Tibiofemoral Compressive Forces in Patients Following Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty During Stationary Cycling.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Journal of Applied Biomechanics Pub Date : 2022-05-19 DOI:10.1123/jab.2020-0324
Erik T. Hummer, Tanner A. Thorsen, Joshua T. Weinhandl, J. Reinbolt, H. Cates, Songning Zhang
{"title":"Medial and Lateral Tibiofemoral Compressive Forces in Patients Following Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty During Stationary Cycling.","authors":"Erik T. Hummer, Tanner A. Thorsen, Joshua T. Weinhandl, J. Reinbolt, H. Cates, Songning Zhang","doi":"10.1123/jab.2020-0324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patients following unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) display interlimb differences in knee joint kinetics during gait and more recently, stationary cycling. The purpose of this study was to use musculoskeletal modeling to estimate total, medial, and lateral tibiofemoral compressive forces for patients following TKA during stationary cycling. Fifteen patients of unilateral TKA, from the same surgeon, participated in cycling at 2 workrates (80 and 100 W). A knee model (OpenSim 3.2) was used to estimate total, medial, and lateral tibiofemoral compressive forces for replaced and nonreplaced limbs. A 2 × 2 (limb × workrate) and a 2 × 2 × 2 (compartment × limb × workrate) analysis of variance were run on the selected variables. Peak medial tibiofemoral compressive force was 23.5% lower for replaced compared to nonreplaced limbs (P = .004, G = 0.80). Peak medial tibiofemoral compressive force was 48.0% greater than peak lateral tibiofemoral compressive force in nonreplaced limbs (MD = 344.5 N, P < .001, G = 1.6) with no difference in replaced limbs (P = .274). Following TKA, patients have greater medial compartment loading on their nonreplaced compared to their replaced limbs and ipsilateral lateral compartment loading. This disproportionate loading may be cause for concern regarding exacerbating contralateral knee osteoarthritis.","PeriodicalId":54883,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Biomechanics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.2020-0324","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Patients following unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) display interlimb differences in knee joint kinetics during gait and more recently, stationary cycling. The purpose of this study was to use musculoskeletal modeling to estimate total, medial, and lateral tibiofemoral compressive forces for patients following TKA during stationary cycling. Fifteen patients of unilateral TKA, from the same surgeon, participated in cycling at 2 workrates (80 and 100 W). A knee model (OpenSim 3.2) was used to estimate total, medial, and lateral tibiofemoral compressive forces for replaced and nonreplaced limbs. A 2 × 2 (limb × workrate) and a 2 × 2 × 2 (compartment × limb × workrate) analysis of variance were run on the selected variables. Peak medial tibiofemoral compressive force was 23.5% lower for replaced compared to nonreplaced limbs (P = .004, G = 0.80). Peak medial tibiofemoral compressive force was 48.0% greater than peak lateral tibiofemoral compressive force in nonreplaced limbs (MD = 344.5 N, P < .001, G = 1.6) with no difference in replaced limbs (P = .274). Following TKA, patients have greater medial compartment loading on their nonreplaced compared to their replaced limbs and ipsilateral lateral compartment loading. This disproportionate loading may be cause for concern regarding exacerbating contralateral knee osteoarthritis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
固定循环期间单侧全膝关节置换术后患者的胫股内侧和外侧压缩力。
单侧全膝关节置换术(TKA)后的患者在步态和最近的固定自行车运动中,膝关节动力学表现出四肢间差异。本研究的目的是使用肌肉骨骼模型来估计TKA患者在静止循环中的总、内侧和外侧胫股压缩力。来自同一外科医生的15名单侧TKA患者以2种工作率(80和100W)参与了自行车运动。膝关节模型(OpenSim 3.2)用于估计更换和未更换肢体的胫股总压力、内侧压力和外侧压力。对所选变量进行2×2(肢×工作率)和2×2。与未置换肢体相比,置换肢体的胫股内侧峰值压缩力低23.5%(P=0.004,G=0.80)。未置换肢体的胫骨股内侧峰值压力比胫骨股外侧峰值压缩力高48.0%(MD=344.5N,P<.001,G=1.6),置换肢体无差异(P=.274)。TKA后,与被替换的肢体和同侧外侧隔室负荷相比,患者在未被替换的四肢上具有更大的内侧隔室负荷。这种不成比例的负荷可能会加剧对侧膝关节骨性关节炎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Biomechanics
Journal of Applied Biomechanics 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Applied Biomechanics (JAB) is to disseminate the highest quality peer-reviewed studies that utilize biomechanical strategies to advance the study of human movement. Areas of interest include clinical biomechanics, gait and posture mechanics, musculoskeletal and neuromuscular biomechanics, sport mechanics, and biomechanical modeling. Studies of sport performance that explicitly generalize to broader activities, contribute substantially to fundamental understanding of human motion, or are in a sport that enjoys wide participation, are welcome. Also within the scope of JAB are studies using biomechanical strategies to investigate the structure, control, function, and state (health and disease) of animals.
期刊最新文献
Do Experienced Adolescent Competition Dancers Alter Landing Kinematics and Kinetics for Split Leaps or Center Leaps After Fatigue? Effects of Stroboscopic Goggles on Standing Balance in the Spatiotemporal and Frequency Domains: An Exploratory Study. Relationship Between Supporting Leg Stiffness and Trunk Kinematics of the Kicking Leg During Soccer Kicking. The Effects of Running Foot Strike Manipulation on Pelvic Floor Muscle Activity in Healthy Nulliparous Females. Fatigue-Related Changes in Running Technique and Mechanical Variables After a Maximal Incremental Test in Recreational Runners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1