The COVID-19 pandemic and the reconstitution of education

IF 1.4 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Studies in Sociology of Education Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI:10.1080/09620214.2022.2138940
Laura C. Engel, C. Maxwell, Miri Yemini
{"title":"The COVID-19 pandemic and the reconstitution of education","authors":"Laura C. Engel, C. Maxwell, Miri Yemini","doi":"10.1080/09620214.2022.2138940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The global COVID-19 pandemic has reconstituted every aspect of education. It reconfigured the most basic assumptions and practices of the delivery of learning. It altered the relationships between school, work, and home. It brought about new understandings of the role of schooling in society. It reconfigured relationships between parents, students, and teachers. It grew human uses of, and interests in, digital technologies in social relations, work, and in teaching and learning. It normalized a new educational vocabulary, such as hybrid teaching, asynchronous learning, and simul-teaching. As the ability to travel was halted, the movement of students and scholars was grounded, shuttering industries, while opening up new opportunities to enhance learning via digital technologies and virtual exchange. The pandemic at the same time laid bare the persistent inequalities of educational opportunities and outcomes. There are massive and lasting racial, gender, and socio-economic disparities emergent in and through COVID-19. The pandemic illustrated and increased the fragilities surrounding many marginalized and minoritized communities, while also fueling hate speech, racism, and social divisions. The persistence of educational inequalities was devastingly clear in the uneven access to technologies both within countries and across the world. Within some places, there was a ready supply of technological and financial resources to ensure the tools needed for continuous learning throughout the early period of the pandemic. In other environments, there was a lack of access to computers, mobile technology, and Internet connectivity, leaving young people to contend with major gaps in formal learning. Millions of young people worldwide may not ever return to formal education. Public educators have left and are leaving the profession in millions, while the educational, social and emotional needs of young people remain urgent. Families are increasingly opting to leave public schools in favor of a private education, furthering an already fragile public education system. Educational researchers will be grappling with the magnitude and effects of these vast changes for years to come. Despite the impacts of COVID-19 still unfolding, scholars are taking stock of what we have learned so far in the INTERNATIONAL STUDIES IN SOCIOLOGY OF EDUCATION 2022, VOL. 31, NO. 4, 397–400 https://doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2022.2138940","PeriodicalId":45706,"journal":{"name":"International Studies in Sociology of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Studies in Sociology of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2022.2138940","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The global COVID-19 pandemic has reconstituted every aspect of education. It reconfigured the most basic assumptions and practices of the delivery of learning. It altered the relationships between school, work, and home. It brought about new understandings of the role of schooling in society. It reconfigured relationships between parents, students, and teachers. It grew human uses of, and interests in, digital technologies in social relations, work, and in teaching and learning. It normalized a new educational vocabulary, such as hybrid teaching, asynchronous learning, and simul-teaching. As the ability to travel was halted, the movement of students and scholars was grounded, shuttering industries, while opening up new opportunities to enhance learning via digital technologies and virtual exchange. The pandemic at the same time laid bare the persistent inequalities of educational opportunities and outcomes. There are massive and lasting racial, gender, and socio-economic disparities emergent in and through COVID-19. The pandemic illustrated and increased the fragilities surrounding many marginalized and minoritized communities, while also fueling hate speech, racism, and social divisions. The persistence of educational inequalities was devastingly clear in the uneven access to technologies both within countries and across the world. Within some places, there was a ready supply of technological and financial resources to ensure the tools needed for continuous learning throughout the early period of the pandemic. In other environments, there was a lack of access to computers, mobile technology, and Internet connectivity, leaving young people to contend with major gaps in formal learning. Millions of young people worldwide may not ever return to formal education. Public educators have left and are leaving the profession in millions, while the educational, social and emotional needs of young people remain urgent. Families are increasingly opting to leave public schools in favor of a private education, furthering an already fragile public education system. Educational researchers will be grappling with the magnitude and effects of these vast changes for years to come. Despite the impacts of COVID-19 still unfolding, scholars are taking stock of what we have learned so far in the INTERNATIONAL STUDIES IN SOCIOLOGY OF EDUCATION 2022, VOL. 31, NO. 4, 397–400 https://doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2022.2138940
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎疫情与教育重构
全球新冠肺炎疫情重新构成了教育的方方面面。它重新配置了提供学习的最基本假设和做法。它改变了学校、工作和家庭之间的关系。它使人们对学校教育在社会中的作用有了新的认识。它重新配置了家长、学生和老师之间的关系。它增加了人类在社会关系、工作以及教学中对数字技术的使用和兴趣。它规范了一种新的教育词汇,如混合教学、异步学习和同步教学。随着旅行能力的停止,学生和学者的流动被禁止,行业关闭,同时为通过数字技术和虚拟交流加强学习开辟了新的机会。与此同时,疫情暴露了教育机会和结果的持续不平等。新冠肺炎及其引发的巨大而持久的种族、性别和社会经济差异。疫情表明并加剧了许多边缘化和少数族裔社区的脆弱性,同时也助长了仇恨言论、种族主义和社会分裂。教育不平等的持续存在,在各国内部和世界各地获得技术的机会不均衡,这一点非常明显。在一些地方,有现成的技术和财政资源,以确保在疫情早期持续学习所需的工具。在其他环境中,缺乏计算机、移动技术和互联网连接,使年轻人在正式学习中面临重大差距。全世界数以百万计的年轻人可能永远无法重返正规教育。数以百万计的公共教育工作者已经离开并正在离开这一职业,而年轻人的教育、社会和情感需求仍然紧迫。越来越多的家庭选择离开公立学校,转而接受私立教育,这进一步加剧了本已脆弱的公立教育系统。教育研究人员将在未来几年努力应对这些巨大变化的规模和影响。尽管新冠肺炎的影响仍在显现,但学者们正在评估我们在《2022年国际教育社会学研究》第31卷第4期第397-400页中迄今为止所学到的知识https://doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2022.2138940
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: International Studies in Sociology of Education is an international journal and publishes papers in the sociology of education which critically engage with theoretical and empirical issues, drawn from as wide a range of perspectives as possible. It aims to move debates forward. The journal is international in outlook and readership and receives papers from around the world. The journal publishes four issues a year; the first three are devoted to a particular theme while the fourth is an "open" issue.
期刊最新文献
Space, education, and inclusion; interdisciplinary approaches (1st edition) Book review symposium on the culture trap: ethnic expectations and unequal schooling for black youth The Power of the Culture Trap: Highlighting the Importance of Comparative and International Perspectives in Sociology of Education, Derron Wallace, The Culture Trap: Ethnic Expectations & Unequal Schooling for Black Youth: Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2023, 296 pp., £19.99 (paperback), £74.00 (hardback), ISBN 978019753146 The culture trap: ethnic expectations and unequal schooling for Black youth The culture trap: ethnic expectations and unequal schooling for black youth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1