A la praxis por el retorno a la dialéctica (o sobre el “leninismo” de Th. W. Adorno)

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY Bajo Palabra-Journal of Philosophy Pub Date : 2019-07-29 DOI:10.15366/BP2019.21.014
Marcela Vélez León
{"title":"A la praxis por el retorno a la dialéctica (o sobre el “leninismo” de Th. W. Adorno)","authors":"Marcela Vélez León","doi":"10.15366/BP2019.21.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolEl objetivo del presente articulo es analizar el alcance que sobre el desarrollo filosofico de Theodor W. Adorno pudiera haber ejercido la figura de Lenin. ?Cabe decir que Adorno fuera “leninista”? Toda vez que las referencias a Lenin son mas bien escasas en el corpus bibliografico de Adorno, resulta cuando menos llamativo que este le propusiera a Max Horkheimer realizar un “manifiesto estrictamente leninista” en 1956. Para profundizar en este interrogante sera esencial reflexionar sobre el devenir de la nocion de “praxis” a comienzos del siglo XX, especialmente en su vinculo con el pensamiento dialectico heredado de la filosofia hegeliana EnglishThe aim of this article is to analyse the scope that Lenin’s figure could have exerted on Theodor W. Adorno’s philosophical development. Could be said that Adorno was “Leninist”? Since references to Lenin are rather scarce in Adorno’s bibliographic corpus, it is at least striking that Adorno proposed to Max Horkheimer to make a “strictly Leninist Manifest” in 1956. To deepen this question, it will be essential to reflect on the evolution of the notion of “praxis” at the beginning of the 20th century, especially in its link with the dialectical thought inherited from Hegelian philosophy","PeriodicalId":40614,"journal":{"name":"Bajo Palabra-Journal of Philosophy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bajo Palabra-Journal of Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15366/BP2019.21.014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

espanolEl objetivo del presente articulo es analizar el alcance que sobre el desarrollo filosofico de Theodor W. Adorno pudiera haber ejercido la figura de Lenin. ?Cabe decir que Adorno fuera “leninista”? Toda vez que las referencias a Lenin son mas bien escasas en el corpus bibliografico de Adorno, resulta cuando menos llamativo que este le propusiera a Max Horkheimer realizar un “manifiesto estrictamente leninista” en 1956. Para profundizar en este interrogante sera esencial reflexionar sobre el devenir de la nocion de “praxis” a comienzos del siglo XX, especialmente en su vinculo con el pensamiento dialectico heredado de la filosofia hegeliana EnglishThe aim of this article is to analyse the scope that Lenin’s figure could have exerted on Theodor W. Adorno’s philosophical development. Could be said that Adorno was “Leninist”? Since references to Lenin are rather scarce in Adorno’s bibliographic corpus, it is at least striking that Adorno proposed to Max Horkheimer to make a “strictly Leninist Manifest” in 1956. To deepen this question, it will be essential to reflect on the evolution of the notion of “praxis” at the beginning of the 20th century, especially in its link with the dialectical thought inherited from Hegelian philosophy
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
回归辩证法的实践(或关于TH.W.阿多诺的“列宁主义”)
这篇文章的目的是分析西奥多·W·阿多诺的哲学发展的范围。阿多诺可以发挥列宁的形象?可以说阿多诺是“列宁主义者”?由于阿多诺的书目语料库中很少提到列宁,因此他建议马克斯·霍克海默在1956年发表一份“严格的列宁主义宣言”,这一点就不那么引人注目了。为了深入研究这个问题,必须反思20世纪初“实践”概念的演变,特别是它与继承自英国黑格尔哲学的辩证思想的联系。本文的目的是分析列宁形象对西奥多·W·阿多诺哲学发展的影响。可以说阿多诺是“列宁主义者”?由于阿多诺的书目语料库中很少提到列宁,因此阿多诺建议马克斯·霍克海默在1956年发表一份“严格的列宁主义者宣言”,这至少是令人震惊的。要深入研究这个问题,必须反思20世纪初“实践”概念的演变,特别是与黑格尔哲学所继承的辩证思想的联系
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Capital, fictions, and ecology The Cinematic Daydream as a Tool of Political Emancipation: Plus-de-Jouir, Aufhebung and the Parallax Planetary Memory and Trans-species Immunity Philosophy and Politics – An Odd Couple Epistemología y cuidado: dos umbrales entre la filosofía y la política
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1