Everyone Is Always Aging: Glocalizing Digital Experiences by Considering the Oldest Cohort of Users

IF 1.5 4区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION Technical Communication Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.55177/tc674376
Allegra W. Smith
{"title":"Everyone Is Always Aging: Glocalizing Digital Experiences by Considering the Oldest Cohort of Users","authors":"Allegra W. Smith","doi":"10.55177/tc674376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Older adults (aged 65+) represent an under-explored group in technical communication, despite rapid population aging. Designing for older age cohorts holds potential for \"glocalization\"—integrating the local and the global—through attending to the needs of\n a specific user community while benefiting all users through interventions that prioritize usability, accessibility, and generational cultures. Method: Using structured task analysis methods, I investigated the steps and decisions that six adults aged 75+ took to accomplish\n five increasingly difficult tasks. Results: Though participants were easily able to access the Internet and find a news story online, they faced difficulties when attempting to modify the homepage on their browser, use mapping tools to determine the distance between two locations,\n and identify a government document answering a question about income taxes. These findings point to four key considerations when designing for older age cohorts: user customization and personalization, information literacy, deceptive patterns, and mismatched mental models stemming from gaps\n between declarative and procedural knowledge. Addressing these needs through targeted design, documentation, and education can help the oldest user group to realize their technological goals. Conclusion: This very localized study of a specific group of users has\n global implications for research and practice. Designing experiences for the oldest adults provides critical opportunities for usability, because though they represent a specific user community, designing for them and alongside them actually benefits all users, because everyone is always\n aging. Thus, accounting for aging bodies and minds serves as an important form of glocalization for designers of communication.","PeriodicalId":46338,"journal":{"name":"Technical Communication","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technical Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55177/tc674376","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose: Older adults (aged 65+) represent an under-explored group in technical communication, despite rapid population aging. Designing for older age cohorts holds potential for "glocalization"—integrating the local and the global—through attending to the needs of a specific user community while benefiting all users through interventions that prioritize usability, accessibility, and generational cultures. Method: Using structured task analysis methods, I investigated the steps and decisions that six adults aged 75+ took to accomplish five increasingly difficult tasks. Results: Though participants were easily able to access the Internet and find a news story online, they faced difficulties when attempting to modify the homepage on their browser, use mapping tools to determine the distance between two locations, and identify a government document answering a question about income taxes. These findings point to four key considerations when designing for older age cohorts: user customization and personalization, information literacy, deceptive patterns, and mismatched mental models stemming from gaps between declarative and procedural knowledge. Addressing these needs through targeted design, documentation, and education can help the oldest user group to realize their technological goals. Conclusion: This very localized study of a specific group of users has global implications for research and practice. Designing experiences for the oldest adults provides critical opportunities for usability, because though they represent a specific user community, designing for them and alongside them actually benefits all users, because everyone is always aging. Thus, accounting for aging bodies and minds serves as an important form of glocalization for designers of communication.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
每个人都在变老:通过考虑最老的用户群体来提升数字体验
目的:尽管人口快速老龄化,但老年人(65岁以上)在技术交流方面是一个探索不足的群体。为老年群体设计具有“全球化”的潜力,即通过关注特定用户社区的需求,将当地和全球融合在一起,同时通过优先考虑可用性、可访问性和世代文化的干预措施,使所有用户受益。方法:使用结构化任务分析方法,我调查了六名75岁以上的成年人为完成五项难度越来越大的任务所采取的步骤和决定。结果:尽管参与者很容易访问互联网并在网上找到新闻报道,但他们在试图修改浏览器上的主页、使用地图工具确定两个地点之间的距离以及识别回答所得税问题的政府文件时都面临困难。这些发现指出了为老年群体设计时的四个关键考虑因素:用户定制和个性化、信息素养、欺骗性模式,以及由于陈述性和程序性知识之间的差距而导致的不匹配的心理模型。通过有针对性的设计、文档和教育来满足这些需求,可以帮助最年长的用户群体实现他们的技术目标。结论:这项针对特定用户群体的非常本地化的研究对研究和实践具有全球意义。为最年长的成年人设计体验为可用性提供了关键的机会,因为尽管他们代表了一个特定的用户群体,但为他们设计并与他们一起设计实际上对所有用户都有好处,因为每个人都在变老。因此,对沟通设计师来说,考虑衰老的身体和思想是一种重要的全球化形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Technical Communication
Technical Communication COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
From the Poor to the Rich: Predatory Inclusion and the Robinhood App Review of Research: Critical Interface Analysis as a Heuristic for Justice-Focused, Community-Engaged Design Research Making Solutions Visible: Facilitating Housing Equality through Interface Design Driving Innovation: Analyzing Mobile Ridesharing App Interfaces and Moving Toward Community-Based User Experience (CBX) Reporting Online Aggression: A Transnational Comparative Interface Analysis of Sina Weibo and Twitter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1