Queerly Christified Bodies: Women Martyrs, Christification, and the Compulsory Masculinisation Thesis

Luis Josué Salés
{"title":"Queerly Christified Bodies: Women Martyrs, Christification, and the Compulsory Masculinisation Thesis","authors":"Luis Josué Salés","doi":"10.1080/2222582X.2020.1845572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Early Christian women martyrs have been studied from several angles, including especially critical readings that underscore their narrative masculinisation through various representational devices. I call this approach the “compulsory masculinisation thesis.” Accordingly, scholars have largely understood the martyrological narrative as a process of masculinisation of the female martyr that is often attributed substantive reifying force. I suggest, instead, that a series of changes in the apparatus of Roman sexual difference during the early imperial era complicate this picture. I argue, instead, that the female martyrs in view here, Blandina, Perpetua, and Febronia, were not masculinised in any substantive way, but rather were queered in their femininity as a strategy of subverting Roman gender systems through a logic of Christification that defies stable categorisation.","PeriodicalId":40708,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Early Christian History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/2222582X.2020.1845572","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Early Christian History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2222582X.2020.1845572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Early Christian women martyrs have been studied from several angles, including especially critical readings that underscore their narrative masculinisation through various representational devices. I call this approach the “compulsory masculinisation thesis.” Accordingly, scholars have largely understood the martyrological narrative as a process of masculinisation of the female martyr that is often attributed substantive reifying force. I suggest, instead, that a series of changes in the apparatus of Roman sexual difference during the early imperial era complicate this picture. I argue, instead, that the female martyrs in view here, Blandina, Perpetua, and Febronia, were not masculinised in any substantive way, but rather were queered in their femininity as a strategy of subverting Roman gender systems through a logic of Christification that defies stable categorisation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基督化的身体:女性殉道者、基督化和强制男性化论文
摘要早期基督教女殉道者从多个角度进行了研究,包括通过各种表征手段强调其叙事男性化的批判性解读。我称这种方法为“强制性的男性化理论”。因此,学者们在很大程度上将殉道叙事理解为女性殉道者的男性化过程,通常被认为是实质性的具体化力量。相反,我认为,在帝国早期,罗马性别差异机制的一系列变化使这一情况复杂化。相反,我认为,这里所看到的女性殉道者,布兰迪娜、佩佩图阿和费布罗尼亚,并没有以任何实质性的方式被男性化,而是被女性化所困扰,这是一种通过基督教化逻辑颠覆罗马性别体系的策略,而这种逻辑挑战了稳定的分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Fear and Self-Truth: Parrēsia in Augustine’s Doctrine of Emotions Christian Persecution in Antiquity , by Wolfram KinzigChristian Persecution in Antiquity, by Wolfram Kinzig, Translated by Markus Bockmuehl, Baylor University Press, 2022., viii + 173 pp., ISBN: 978-1-4813-1388-9 Witnessing with Parrēsia : Fearless Speech in the Acts of the Apostles Paul's Ambivalent Parrēsia Parrēsia beyond Humankind? Exploring the Representation of the Voice of Creation in the Epistle to the Romans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1