Decolonising Museum Practice in a Postcolonial Nation: Museum’s Visual Order as the Work of Representation in Constructing Colonial Memory

IF 0.5 Q3 CULTURAL STUDIES Open Cultural Studies Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1515/culture-2022-0157
D. Prianti, I. W. Suyadnya
{"title":"Decolonising Museum Practice in a Postcolonial Nation: Museum’s Visual Order as the Work of Representation in Constructing Colonial Memory","authors":"D. Prianti, I. W. Suyadnya","doi":"10.1515/culture-2022-0157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The study of colonialism and its legacies have mostly left the category of memory studies. However, for the colonised subject, what they experienced in the past inevitably forms their present and future discourse. This study focuses on how the museum’s visual order articulates colonial memory. By looking at the work of representation, in this context museum’s visual order, this study investigates how memory lives on through the circulation of colonial memory that the museum simulates. Museum’s visual order translates how colonial memory should be remembered and celebrated as public knowledge. Although research on how museums affect society knowledge have been part of both memory and museum studies, those two studies barely touch upon museums’ role in translating colonial memory in the postcolonial nation. Memory lives on through its circulation in media forms. However, premeditation and mediation are made possible through articulating social and cultural sites, in this case, museums practice. In order to achieve its purposes, this research investigates public museums in different parts of Java, Indonesia which have colonial memory objects. The combination of field observation, document review, and visual method followed by focus group discussion between stakeholders and researchers are conducted to propose the research conclusion. This research argues that the museum’s visual order translates interrelated colonial memories to be accepted as a part of the history that forms the “existence” of the nation and to be appreciated as public knowledge that is shared and forms the national identity. In doing so, museum practice roams into the area of political visibility which decides the legibility of the narrative related to colonial memory. In addition, as museum practice is basically a colonial legacy, this research concludes that it is essential to deconstruct the practice from the perspective of the colonised.","PeriodicalId":41385,"journal":{"name":"Open Cultural Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/culture-2022-0157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract The study of colonialism and its legacies have mostly left the category of memory studies. However, for the colonised subject, what they experienced in the past inevitably forms their present and future discourse. This study focuses on how the museum’s visual order articulates colonial memory. By looking at the work of representation, in this context museum’s visual order, this study investigates how memory lives on through the circulation of colonial memory that the museum simulates. Museum’s visual order translates how colonial memory should be remembered and celebrated as public knowledge. Although research on how museums affect society knowledge have been part of both memory and museum studies, those two studies barely touch upon museums’ role in translating colonial memory in the postcolonial nation. Memory lives on through its circulation in media forms. However, premeditation and mediation are made possible through articulating social and cultural sites, in this case, museums practice. In order to achieve its purposes, this research investigates public museums in different parts of Java, Indonesia which have colonial memory objects. The combination of field observation, document review, and visual method followed by focus group discussion between stakeholders and researchers are conducted to propose the research conclusion. This research argues that the museum’s visual order translates interrelated colonial memories to be accepted as a part of the history that forms the “existence” of the nation and to be appreciated as public knowledge that is shared and forms the national identity. In doing so, museum practice roams into the area of political visibility which decides the legibility of the narrative related to colonial memory. In addition, as museum practice is basically a colonial legacy, this research concludes that it is essential to deconstruct the practice from the perspective of the colonised.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
后殖民国家的博物馆去殖民化实践:博物馆的视觉秩序作为建构殖民记忆的表现
摘要殖民主义及其遗产的研究大多脱离了记忆研究的范畴。然而,对于被殖民的主体来说,他们过去的经历不可避免地形成了他们现在和未来的话语。这项研究的重点是博物馆的视觉秩序如何表达殖民记忆。通过观察再现工作,在博物馆的视觉秩序中,本研究调查了记忆是如何通过博物馆模拟的殖民记忆的循环而存在的。博物馆的视觉秩序将殖民记忆作为公共知识来纪念和庆祝。尽管关于博物馆如何影响社会知识的研究已经成为记忆和博物馆研究的一部分,但这两项研究几乎没有涉及博物馆在后殖民国家翻译殖民记忆中的作用。记忆通过媒介形式的循环而存在。然而,通过阐明社会和文化遗址,在这种情况下,博物馆的实践,预谋和调解是可能的。为了达到目的,本研究调查了印尼爪哇岛不同地区的公共博物馆,这些博物馆都有殖民记忆对象。结合实地观察、文献综述和可视化方法,利益相关者和研究人员进行焦点小组讨论,提出研究结论。这项研究认为,博物馆的视觉秩序将相互关联的殖民记忆转化为历史的一部分,形成国家的“存在”,并被视为共享的公共知识,形成国家认同。在这样做的过程中,博物馆的实践漫游到了政治可见性的领域,这决定了与殖民记忆相关的叙事的易读性。此外,由于博物馆实践基本上是殖民地的遗产,本研究得出结论,有必要从被殖民者的角度解构这种实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Cultural Studies
Open Cultural Studies CULTURAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Erratum to “‘Thrice the brindled cat hath mew’d’ – The Three Trials of William Hone” Data that Should Not Have Been Given: Noise and Immunity in James Newitt’s HAVEN Tracing Exilience Through Literature and Translation: A Portuguese Gargantua in Paris (1848) Montana as Place of (Un)Belonging: Landscape, Identity, and the American West in Bella Vista (2014) A Syphilis-Giving God? On the Interpretation of the Philistine’s Scourge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1