Luke as the Master Architect of “God’s Plan”: An Analysis of a Distinctive Lucan Concept

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION Biblical Theology Bulletin Pub Date : 2020-11-01 DOI:10.1177/0146107920959001
Brian Schmisek
{"title":"Luke as the Master Architect of “God’s Plan”: An Analysis of a Distinctive Lucan Concept","authors":"Brian Schmisek","doi":"10.1177/0146107920959001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Luke is the singular evangelist to use the term “plan” (boulē) (of God). He is also the only NT author to use the related terms horizō/hōrismenos, and these he uses in a sense similar to “boulē.” This article investigates Luke’s construction and use of the term “plan (of God)” to convey a fundamental proclamation of faith, namely, that the Jesus event fulfilled a predetermined divine plan. Primarily three examples from Luke (Peter’s Speech at Pentecost, Jesus’ words at the Last Supper, and the claim that the Messiah must suffer) demonstrate this claim. Luke’s use of this term reflects Greco-Roman concepts more than those in the LXX and would therefore have been readily understood by his predominantly Gentile audience. Luke may be properly understood as the master architect of God’s plan. This image and language that he forged was ultimately so effective it influenced centuries of Christian thought and catechetical formulae.","PeriodicalId":41921,"journal":{"name":"Biblical Theology Bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0146107920959001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biblical Theology Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0146107920959001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Luke is the singular evangelist to use the term “plan” (boulē) (of God). He is also the only NT author to use the related terms horizō/hōrismenos, and these he uses in a sense similar to “boulē.” This article investigates Luke’s construction and use of the term “plan (of God)” to convey a fundamental proclamation of faith, namely, that the Jesus event fulfilled a predetermined divine plan. Primarily three examples from Luke (Peter’s Speech at Pentecost, Jesus’ words at the Last Supper, and the claim that the Messiah must suffer) demonstrate this claim. Luke’s use of this term reflects Greco-Roman concepts more than those in the LXX and would therefore have been readily understood by his predominantly Gentile audience. Luke may be properly understood as the master architect of God’s plan. This image and language that he forged was ultimately so effective it influenced centuries of Christian thought and catechetical formulae.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卢克作为“上帝的计划”的建筑师:一个独特的路坎概念分析
卢克是唯一一个使用“计划”(boulē)(上帝的)一词的福音传道者。他也是唯一一位使用相关术语horizō/hßrismenos的NT作者,他使用这些术语的意义类似于“boulē”。本文调查了卢克对“(上帝的)计划”一词的构建和使用,以传达信仰的基本宣传,即耶稣事件实现了一个预先确定的神圣计划。卢克的三个例子(彼得在五旬节的演讲,耶稣在最后的晚餐上的话,以及弥赛亚必须受苦的说法)证明了这一说法。卢克对这个术语的使用比LXX中更多地反映了希腊罗马的概念,因此他以非犹太人为主的观众很容易理解。卢克可以被恰当地理解为上帝计划的大师。他塑造的这种形象和语言最终是如此有效,以至于影响了几个世纪的基督教思想和教义公式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: Biblical Theology Bulletin is a distinctive, peer-reviewed, quarterly journal containing articles and reviews written by experts in biblical and theological studies. The editors select articles that provide insights derived from critical biblical scholarship, culture-awareness, and thoughtful reflection on meanings of import for scholars of Bible and religion, religious educators, clergy, and those engaged with social studies in religion, inter-religious studies, and the praxis of biblical religion today. The journal began publication in 1971. It has been distinguished for its early and continuing publication of articles using the social sciences in addition to other critical methods for interpreting the Bible for contemporary readers, teachers, and preachers across cultural and denominational lines.
期刊最新文献
The Ideal Meal: Masculinity and Disability among Host and Guests in Luke Fertility, Slavery, and Biblical Interpretation: John Chrysostom on the Story of Sarah and Hagar Disability as a Symbol of Terror: Rereading the David Narrative in Light of Armed Conflicts in Africa Reading Ancient Temples through the Lens of Disability Studies and Mobility Design Presenting the Issue: Reading Biblical Texts in Conversation with Disability Studies and Health Humanities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1