University Students’ Perspectives on Online Learning via the Microsoft Teams Platform

IF 1.6 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Journal of Education Culture and Society Pub Date : 2023-06-20 DOI:10.15503/jecs2023.1.400.414
Ligita Stramkale
{"title":"University Students’ Perspectives on Online Learning via the Microsoft Teams Platform","authors":"Ligita Stramkale","doi":"10.15503/jecs2023.1.400.414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. The aim of the study was to determine students’ perspectives on collaboration, the study process and motivation while using the Microsoft Teams (MS Teams) platform for online learning. \nMethods. The study involved 124 (N=124) students of 1st-level higher professional education, bachelor’s and master’s study programmes, who studied in full-time and part-time study forms. The study addressed three research questions. RQ1: What are students’ perspectives on collaboration while learning online via the MS Teams platform and whether their opinions depend on age, study level, form of study and course? RQ2: What are students’ perspectives on the study process via the MS Teams platform, and whether their views influenced by age, study level, study form and course? RQ3: What is the students’ motivation to study online on the MS Teams platform, and does it depend on age, level of study, study form and course? The study used statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS 22.0) for quantitative data analysis. \nResults. The students believe that they can easily collaborate on the MS Teams platform. Students' perspectives on collaboration are not related to study form, the level of study, or the course, but in some instances, are connected with the age of the students. The majority of students evaluate the study process on MS Teams positively. Their views are not related to study form, the course or the age, but in some cases, connected with the level of study. The students’ motivation to study online using MS Teams is grown by reducing time consumption, the convenience of learning in their environment and the ability to complete the tasks easier, but their motivation could decrease because this form of study is less exciting compared with face-to-face and does not create satisfaction. \nConclusion. The study concluded that: Firstly, with increasing age, student satisfaction with mutual collaboration on the MS Team platform declines, secondly students of the lower-level programme believe they are more likely to ask questions, receive feedback, and understand information than those who study in the higher-level programme, thirdly young students and those who study in the lower-level programme find learning online via the MS Teams platform more exciting than older students and those who study in the higher-level programme. Further research needs to find out why students of the lower-level study programmes believe they are more likely to ask questions, receive feedback and understand information while learning online on MS Teams, and it is also essential to investigate what factors determine whether or not studies are exciting.","PeriodicalId":30646,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education Culture and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education Culture and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2023.1.400.414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim. The aim of the study was to determine students’ perspectives on collaboration, the study process and motivation while using the Microsoft Teams (MS Teams) platform for online learning. Methods. The study involved 124 (N=124) students of 1st-level higher professional education, bachelor’s and master’s study programmes, who studied in full-time and part-time study forms. The study addressed three research questions. RQ1: What are students’ perspectives on collaboration while learning online via the MS Teams platform and whether their opinions depend on age, study level, form of study and course? RQ2: What are students’ perspectives on the study process via the MS Teams platform, and whether their views influenced by age, study level, study form and course? RQ3: What is the students’ motivation to study online on the MS Teams platform, and does it depend on age, level of study, study form and course? The study used statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS 22.0) for quantitative data analysis. Results. The students believe that they can easily collaborate on the MS Teams platform. Students' perspectives on collaboration are not related to study form, the level of study, or the course, but in some instances, are connected with the age of the students. The majority of students evaluate the study process on MS Teams positively. Their views are not related to study form, the course or the age, but in some cases, connected with the level of study. The students’ motivation to study online using MS Teams is grown by reducing time consumption, the convenience of learning in their environment and the ability to complete the tasks easier, but their motivation could decrease because this form of study is less exciting compared with face-to-face and does not create satisfaction. Conclusion. The study concluded that: Firstly, with increasing age, student satisfaction with mutual collaboration on the MS Team platform declines, secondly students of the lower-level programme believe they are more likely to ask questions, receive feedback, and understand information than those who study in the higher-level programme, thirdly young students and those who study in the lower-level programme find learning online via the MS Teams platform more exciting than older students and those who study in the higher-level programme. Further research needs to find out why students of the lower-level study programmes believe they are more likely to ask questions, receive feedback and understand information while learning online on MS Teams, and it is also essential to investigate what factors determine whether or not studies are exciting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大学生对微软团队平台在线学习的看法
目标该研究的目的是确定学生在使用微软团队(MS Teams)平台进行在线学习时对合作、学习过程和动机的看法。方法。这项研究涉及124名(N=124)一级高等专业教育、学士和硕士学习项目的学生,他们以全日制和非全日制学习形式学习。该研究涉及三个研究问题。RQ1:学生在通过MS Teams平台在线学习时对协作的看法是什么?他们的看法是否取决于年龄、学习水平、学习形式和课程?RQ2:学生对MS Teams平台的学习过程有什么看法,他们的看法是否受到年龄、学习水平、学习形式和课程的影响?RQ3:学生在MS Teams平台上在线学习的动机是什么?这取决于年龄、学习水平、学习形式和课程吗?本研究采用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS 22.0)进行定量数据分析。后果学生们相信他们可以在MS Teams平台上轻松协作。学生对合作的看法与学习形式、学习水平或课程无关,但在某些情况下,与学生的年龄有关。大多数学生对MS团队的学习过程评价积极。他们的观点与学习形式、课程或年龄无关,但在某些情况下,与学习水平有关。学生使用MS Teams在线学习的动机是通过减少时间消耗、在环境中学习的便利性以及更容易完成任务的能力来提高的,但他们的动机可能会降低,因为与面对面学习相比,这种学习形式不那么令人兴奋,也不会带来满足感。结论该研究得出的结论是:首先,随着年龄的增长,学生对MS团队平台上的相互合作的满意度下降,其次,低级别课程的学生认为,与在高级别课程学习的学生相比,他们更有可能提出问题、接受反馈和理解信息,第三,年轻学生和在低级别课程中学习的学生发现,通过MS Teams平台进行的在线学习比年长学生和在高级别课程中的学生更令人兴奋。需要进一步的研究来找出为什么低水平学习项目的学生认为他们在MS团队上在线学习时更有可能提出问题、获得反馈和理解信息,还必须调查哪些因素决定了学习是否令人兴奋。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Education Culture and Society
Journal of Education Culture and Society SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
27.30%
发文量
75
期刊最新文献
Narrating Chinese Teaching and Learning in Culturally Local Thai Schools The Influence of Ottoman Culture on the Way of life of Albanian Society Motivation and the Psycho-Emotional Reaction of Volunteers in War-Time The Dynamics of Motivation and Social Atmosphere of the Classroom in the Process of Pedagogical Intervention of Reading Comprehension Objective Feedback: The Views of Pedagogical Study Programme Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1