Making asylum work? Civic stratification and labor-related regularization among rejected asylum seekers in Germany

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q1 LAW Law & Policy Pub Date : 2022-01-28 DOI:10.1111/lapo.12182
Elina Jonitz, Arjen Leerkes
{"title":"Making asylum work? Civic stratification and labor-related regularization among rejected asylum seekers in Germany","authors":"Elina Jonitz,&nbsp;Arjen Leerkes","doi":"10.1111/lapo.12182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Rejected asylum seekers often do not return to their countries of origin and face precarious living conditions in destination countries. Taking Germany as a strategic case, we investigate whether labor-related regularization, or “laborization,” may serve as a solution for such migrants. We analyze the factors determining access to such regularization and how labor-related regularization relates to migrants' needs and aspirations. Based on extensive desk research and interviews with stakeholders, including (rejected) asylum seekers in Stuttgart, we find that laborization provides resourceful and “deserving” individuals with valuable opportunities to realize their aspirations, but it is insufficient to fully address non-deportability.</p>","PeriodicalId":47050,"journal":{"name":"Law & Policy","volume":"44 1","pages":"23-43"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/lapo.12182","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lapo.12182","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Rejected asylum seekers often do not return to their countries of origin and face precarious living conditions in destination countries. Taking Germany as a strategic case, we investigate whether labor-related regularization, or “laborization,” may serve as a solution for such migrants. We analyze the factors determining access to such regularization and how labor-related regularization relates to migrants' needs and aspirations. Based on extensive desk research and interviews with stakeholders, including (rejected) asylum seekers in Stuttgart, we find that laborization provides resourceful and “deserving” individuals with valuable opportunities to realize their aspirations, but it is insufficient to fully address non-deportability.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
让收容所起作用?在德国被拒绝的寻求庇护者中的公民分层和与劳动相关的正规化
被拒绝的寻求庇护者往往不会返回原籍国,在目的地国面临不稳定的生活条件。以德国为战略案例,我们调查了与劳动相关的正规化或“劳工化”是否可以作为此类移民的解决方案。我们分析了决定获得这种正规化的因素,以及与劳工相关的正规化如何与移民的需求和愿望联系起来。基于广泛的案头研究和对利益相关者的采访,包括斯图加特的(被拒绝的)寻求庇护者,我们发现劳动化为足智多谋和“应得的”个人提供了实现其愿望的宝贵机会,但这不足以完全解决不可遣返问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
15.40%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: International and interdisciplinary in scope, Law & Policy embraces varied research methodologies that interrogate law, governance, and public policy worldwide. Law & Policy makes a vital contribution to the current dialogue on contemporary policy by publishing innovative, peer-reviewed articles on such critical topics as • government and self-regulation • health • environment • family • gender • taxation and finance • legal decision-making • criminal justice • human rights
期刊最新文献
Prosecutor-Led Bail Reform: An Observational Case Study in Philadelphia Issue Information Implementing Equality: State (Non)compliance With Judicial Revisions to Public Policy on Gay Rights “Why Would I Go Back There?”: Medical Mistrust and the Problem of Maternal Mortality An opportunity for abolition: McCleskey, innocence, and the modern death penalty decline
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1