Gender-Based Environmental Violence in Colombia: Problematising Dominant Notions of Gender-Based Violence During Peacebuilding

Natalia Urzola, María Paula González
{"title":"Gender-Based Environmental Violence in Colombia: Problematising Dominant Notions of Gender-Based Violence During Peacebuilding","authors":"Natalia Urzola, María Paula González","doi":"10.1080/13200968.2022.2147704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Colombia’s 2016 Peace Agreement is innovative in many ways. Remarkably, the agreement places significant emphasis on gender as a guiding principle. Gender-related measures are at the core of Colombia’s peacebuilding efforts. Nevertheless, six years after, parties have not fully implemented these measures; a narrow understanding of the concept of violence could be one of the reasons behind this. The agreement mainly refers to the physical and dominant understanding of gender-based violence (GBV). However, this understanding is problematic. Environmental and climate-related causes are structural to the Colombian armed conflict, and critical in building peace. Environmental violence points to human-induced activities that cause harms to the environment. Climate violence, one manifestation of environmental violence, is a type of violence that worsens underlying conditions of inequalities through extreme climate conditions. Drawing on the 2016 Colombian Peace Agreement, this article focuses on the experiences of Colombian rural women to assess whether expanding dominant concepts of GBV help implement environmental peacebuilding commitments. Applying an intersectional ecofeminist reading could contribute to acknowledging particular forms of violence embedded in the climate and peace crises in Colombia during the implementation phase of gender-related peace commitments and push towards the recognition of environmental and climate violence as GBV.","PeriodicalId":43532,"journal":{"name":"Australian Feminist Law Journal","volume":"48 1","pages":"245 - 264"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Feminist Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13200968.2022.2147704","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Colombia’s 2016 Peace Agreement is innovative in many ways. Remarkably, the agreement places significant emphasis on gender as a guiding principle. Gender-related measures are at the core of Colombia’s peacebuilding efforts. Nevertheless, six years after, parties have not fully implemented these measures; a narrow understanding of the concept of violence could be one of the reasons behind this. The agreement mainly refers to the physical and dominant understanding of gender-based violence (GBV). However, this understanding is problematic. Environmental and climate-related causes are structural to the Colombian armed conflict, and critical in building peace. Environmental violence points to human-induced activities that cause harms to the environment. Climate violence, one manifestation of environmental violence, is a type of violence that worsens underlying conditions of inequalities through extreme climate conditions. Drawing on the 2016 Colombian Peace Agreement, this article focuses on the experiences of Colombian rural women to assess whether expanding dominant concepts of GBV help implement environmental peacebuilding commitments. Applying an intersectional ecofeminist reading could contribute to acknowledging particular forms of violence embedded in the climate and peace crises in Colombia during the implementation phase of gender-related peace commitments and push towards the recognition of environmental and climate violence as GBV.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哥伦比亚基于性别的环境暴力:建设和平期间基于性别的暴力主流观念的问题
摘要:哥伦比亚2016年《和平协议》在许多方面都具有创新性。值得注意的是,该协议非常重视将性别作为一项指导原则。与性别有关的措施是哥伦比亚建设和平努力的核心。然而,六年后,各方仍未充分执行这些措施;对暴力概念的狭隘理解可能是这背后的原因之一。该协议主要涉及对基于性别的暴力(GBV)的身体和主导理解。然而,这种理解是有问题的。与环境和气候有关的原因是哥伦比亚武装冲突的结构性原因,对建设和平至关重要。环境暴力指的是人类引发的对环境造成危害的活动。气候暴力是环境暴力的一种表现形式,是一种通过极端气候条件恶化不平等根本条件的暴力。本文借鉴2016年《哥伦比亚和平协议》,重点关注哥伦比亚农村妇女的经验,以评估扩大基于性别暴力的主导概念是否有助于履行环境建设和平承诺。在与性别有关的和平承诺的执行阶段,应用跨部门的生态女权主义解读有助于承认哥伦比亚气候与和平危机中存在的特定形式的暴力,并推动承认环境和气候暴力为基于性别的暴力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
40.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Final Fatal Girls – Horror and the Legal Subject Life as Distinct from Patriarchal Influence: Exploring Queerness and Freedom through Portrait of a Lady on Fire On Romancing the Tomes: Popular Culture, Law and Feminism: A Public Conversation Performance, Credibility and #MeToo Testimony in Rush v Nationwide News Pty Ltd  ‘A Daughter is Like a Pot of Fish Paste While a Son is Like Pure Gold’: Gendered Conceptions of ‘Human Dignity’ in Cambodia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1