Pub Date : 2024-04-08DOI: 10.1080/13200968.2024.2333541
Penny Crofts, Honni van Rijswijk
In mainstream culture, the horror genre is frequently looked down upon as trivial, shlocky and nasty – horror films are seen as being cheap to make, made for a younger, mass audience, and horror fi...
{"title":"Final Fatal Girls – Horror and the Legal Subject","authors":"Penny Crofts, Honni van Rijswijk","doi":"10.1080/13200968.2024.2333541","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13200968.2024.2333541","url":null,"abstract":"In mainstream culture, the horror genre is frequently looked down upon as trivial, shlocky and nasty – horror films are seen as being cheap to make, made for a younger, mass audience, and horror fi...","PeriodicalId":43532,"journal":{"name":"Australian Feminist Law Journal","volume":"96 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140598199","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-01DOI: 10.1080/13200968.2024.2328192
Emma Genovese, Tamsin Phillipa Paige
This article examines the interconnection of queerness and freedom in Céline Sciamma’s film Portrait of a Lady on Fire. The article focuses on the unattainable relationship between Héloïse and Mari...
本文探讨了 Céline Sciamma 的电影《着火女士的肖像》中同性恋与自由之间的相互联系。文章的重点是 Héloïse 和 Mari 之间遥不可及的关系。
{"title":"Life as Distinct from Patriarchal Influence: Exploring Queerness and Freedom through Portrait of a Lady on Fire","authors":"Emma Genovese, Tamsin Phillipa Paige","doi":"10.1080/13200968.2024.2328192","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13200968.2024.2328192","url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the interconnection of queerness and freedom in Céline Sciamma’s film Portrait of a Lady on Fire. The article focuses on the unattainable relationship between Héloïse and Mari...","PeriodicalId":43532,"journal":{"name":"Australian Feminist Law Journal","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140598330","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-22DOI: 10.1080/13200968.2024.2326674
Sarah Ailwood
Rush v Nationwide News, a defamation case between Geoffrey Rush and the publishers of the Daily Telegraph, has been credited with exerting a ‘chilling effect’ on the #MeToo moment in Australia. The...
杰弗里-拉什(Geoffrey Rush)与《每日电讯报》出版商之间的诽谤案 "拉什诉全国新闻报(Rush v Nationwide News)"被认为对澳大利亚的 #MeToo 浪潮产生了 "寒蝉效应"。...
{"title":"Performance, Credibility and #MeToo Testimony in Rush v Nationwide News Pty Ltd","authors":"Sarah Ailwood","doi":"10.1080/13200968.2024.2326674","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13200968.2024.2326674","url":null,"abstract":"Rush v Nationwide News, a defamation case between Geoffrey Rush and the publishers of the Daily Telegraph, has been credited with exerting a ‘chilling effect’ on the #MeToo moment in Australia. The...","PeriodicalId":43532,"journal":{"name":"Australian Feminist Law Journal","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140205672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-22DOI: 10.1080/13200968.2024.2326678
Margaret Thornton, Johanna Commins
Emerita Professor Margaret Thornton's edited collection, Romancing the Tomes: Popular Culture, Law and Feminism was published in 2002, and grew out of the workshop Margaret organised under the ausp...
玛格丽特-桑顿(Margaret Thornton)名誉教授编辑的文集《浪漫的通经》(Romancing the Tomes)于 2002 年出版:玛格丽特-桑顿(Margaret Thornton)的编辑文集《浪漫的通书:大众文化、法律与女权主义》(Romancing Tomes: Popular Culture, Law and Feminism)于 2002 年出版。
{"title":"On Romancing the Tomes: Popular Culture, Law and Feminism: A Public Conversation","authors":"Margaret Thornton, Johanna Commins","doi":"10.1080/13200968.2024.2326678","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13200968.2024.2326678","url":null,"abstract":"Emerita Professor Margaret Thornton's edited collection, Romancing the Tomes: Popular Culture, Law and Feminism was published in 2002, and grew out of the workshop Margaret organised under the ausp...","PeriodicalId":43532,"journal":{"name":"Australian Feminist Law Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140201212","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-29DOI: 10.1080/13200968.2024.2316808
Boravin Tann
The concept of human dignity is not universally understood and has many different meanings across diverse contexts. This article interrogates conceptions of human dignity in Cambodia by drawing on ...
{"title":" ‘A Daughter is Like a Pot of Fish Paste While a Son is Like Pure Gold’: Gendered Conceptions of ‘Human Dignity’ in Cambodia","authors":"Boravin Tann","doi":"10.1080/13200968.2024.2316808","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13200968.2024.2316808","url":null,"abstract":"The concept of human dignity is not universally understood and has many different meanings across diverse contexts. This article interrogates conceptions of human dignity in Cambodia by drawing on ...","PeriodicalId":43532,"journal":{"name":"Australian Feminist Law Journal","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140018323","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-27DOI: 10.1080/13200968.2024.2310315
Tegan Evans
Anne Bonny and Mary Read remain the best known, and perhaps only, female pirates active in the so-called Golden Age of Piracy, the late 17th and early 18th century in the Caribbean. They were caugh...
{"title":"Enemies of All Mankind: Gender, Violence and the Queering of Anne Bonny and Mary Read","authors":"Tegan Evans","doi":"10.1080/13200968.2024.2310315","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13200968.2024.2310315","url":null,"abstract":"Anne Bonny and Mary Read remain the best known, and perhaps only, female pirates active in the so-called Golden Age of Piracy, the late 17th and early 18th century in the Caribbean. They were caugh...","PeriodicalId":43532,"journal":{"name":"Australian Feminist Law Journal","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140025350","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-25DOI: 10.1080/13200968.2023.2281463
Arti Gupta
Feminist scholarship has devoted significant time and space to critiquing court judgments that make patriarchal-normative assumptions about consent, resistance to sex, ‘provocation’ of dress, habit...
{"title":"Child Sexual Abuse by Fathers in India: Exploring the Layers of ‘Honour’ in Trials","authors":"Arti Gupta","doi":"10.1080/13200968.2023.2281463","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13200968.2023.2281463","url":null,"abstract":"Feminist scholarship has devoted significant time and space to critiquing court judgments that make patriarchal-normative assumptions about consent, resistance to sex, ‘provocation’ of dress, habit...","PeriodicalId":43532,"journal":{"name":"Australian Feminist Law Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2023-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139052137","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-26DOI: 10.1080/13200968.2023.2268877
Mostafa Haider
Experts often debate global microcredit governance along two opposing spectrums: microcredit as either an emancipatory or oppressive instrument for women. Expert debates about women’s emancipation and oppression through microcredit, however, neither consider the women for whom the debate is staged as experts nor explore in sufficient detail the role and effects of expertise. Drawing on a series of interviews in rural Bangladesh, the article offers expert reflections on microcredit governance of three women, often referred to as ‘poor women’ by experts. It puts the three women’s worldviews in an analytical comparison with those of selected microcredit experts. Far from engaging with women’s agency, the article argues that well-known microcredit experts often overestimate their own knowledge and underestimate the knowledge of women, rendering the latter as docile subjects of social and legal reform. With the help of the three women, the article illuminates the role of expertise in the reproduction of knowledge and social hierarchy in global microcredit governance.
{"title":"Behind Women’s Emancipation and Oppression: Contested Expertise in Global Microcredit Governance","authors":"Mostafa Haider","doi":"10.1080/13200968.2023.2268877","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13200968.2023.2268877","url":null,"abstract":"Experts often debate global microcredit governance along two opposing spectrums: microcredit as either an emancipatory or oppressive instrument for women. Expert debates about women’s emancipation and oppression through microcredit, however, neither consider the women for whom the debate is staged as experts nor explore in sufficient detail the role and effects of expertise. Drawing on a series of interviews in rural Bangladesh, the article offers expert reflections on microcredit governance of three women, often referred to as ‘poor women’ by experts. It puts the three women’s worldviews in an analytical comparison with those of selected microcredit experts. Far from engaging with women’s agency, the article argues that well-known microcredit experts often overestimate their own knowledge and underestimate the knowledge of women, rendering the latter as docile subjects of social and legal reform. With the help of the three women, the article illuminates the role of expertise in the reproduction of knowledge and social hierarchy in global microcredit governance.","PeriodicalId":43532,"journal":{"name":"Australian Feminist Law Journal","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136381761","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-01DOI: 10.1080/13200968.2023.2253015
Katie O’Bryan, kate harriden
This article aims to highlight the expertise of First Nations women in water management and use, and the necessity of having their voices heard in this space, as their voices have not received the attention or respect, yindyamarra, they deserve in Australian water law and policy. Before critically examining the articulation of a right to water in the international human rights framework as it applies to First Nations women, this article opens by introducing the nature and importance of First Nations women’s water rights. The article then turns to Australia, outlining the emergence of First Nations rights generally, before turning its attention to water rights. In that respect, Commonwealth law and policy is analysed, given that it is the nation-state with legal personality in international law. Two contrasting case studies follow, illustrating the importance and fragility of First Nations women’s water rights. The article concludes that international law evidences a deficit discourse, providing little basis for nation-states to recognise the holistic nature of water rights of First Nations women, and that Commonwealth law and policy, although showing promising signs, has yet to provide any meaningful scope for First Nations women to use and manage water according to First Nations law.
{"title":"Hear Their Voices: Australia’s First Nations Women and the Legal Recognition of Their Rights to Water","authors":"Katie O’Bryan, kate harriden","doi":"10.1080/13200968.2023.2253015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13200968.2023.2253015","url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to highlight the expertise of First Nations women in water management and use, and the necessity of having their voices heard in this space, as their voices have not received the attention or respect, yindyamarra, they deserve in Australian water law and policy. Before critically examining the articulation of a right to water in the international human rights framework as it applies to First Nations women, this article opens by introducing the nature and importance of First Nations women’s water rights. The article then turns to Australia, outlining the emergence of First Nations rights generally, before turning its attention to water rights. In that respect, Commonwealth law and policy is analysed, given that it is the nation-state with legal personality in international law. Two contrasting case studies follow, illustrating the importance and fragility of First Nations women’s water rights. The article concludes that international law evidences a deficit discourse, providing little basis for nation-states to recognise the holistic nature of water rights of First Nations women, and that Commonwealth law and policy, although showing promising signs, has yet to provide any meaningful scope for First Nations women to use and manage water according to First Nations law.","PeriodicalId":43532,"journal":{"name":"Australian Feminist Law Journal","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135407507","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-20DOI: 10.1080/13200968.2023.2255937
Daryl W. J. Yang
ABSTRACTThis article examines the role that emancipatory science on the innateness and aetiology of sexual orientation has played in the legal advancement of gay rights by analysing recent constitutional decisions on laws criminalising same-sex sexual conduct, in light of the global proliferation of such litigation. Standing at the intersection of comparative constitutional law and science and technology studies, it analyses how judgments on the criminalisation of same-sex sexual conduct across six jurisdictions, namely Belize, Trinidad and Tobago, Botswana, India, Kenya and Singapore, between 2016 and 2020, have dealt with arguments based on emancipatory science. Building on existing scholarship on the role of emancipatory science in the pursuit of queer justice, this article shows how such science has played a mythical role in judicial decisions on the constitutionality of same-sex sexual conduct. In addition to its empirical and theoretical contributions, this article cautions gay right activists and lawyers to carefully consider whether and why they intend to introduce the science of sexual orientation in constitutional litigation over laws criminalising same-sex sexual conduct. AcknowledgementsThe author is grateful to Professor Holly Doremus, whose class on science and regulatory policy an earlier version of this paper was written for, the two anonymous reviewers for their feedback and guidance, and the journal’s editorial team. All errors remain the author’s own.Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Indian Penal Code 1860 (Act 45 of 1860), s 377.2 Navtej Singh Johar v Union of India [2018] 10 S.C.C. 1 [143] (Plurality Opinion of the Chief Justice).3 EG & 7 others v Attorney General; DKM & 9 others (Interested Parties); Katiba Institute & another (Amicus Curiae) (High Court, 2019) [393].4 Kenyan Penal Code 1948 (Cap. 63), ss 162 and 165.5 Welcome to Truth Wins Out’s LGBT Science Project (Directed by Truth Wins Out, 2013) <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vrykpK_MpE8> accessed 14 December 2021.6 ibid.7 Henry L Minton, Departing from Deviance: A History of Homosexual Rights and Emancipatory Science in America (University of Chicago Press 2001) 3.8 ibid 2.9 James Steakley, ‘Per Scientiam Ad Justitiam: Magnus Hirschfeld and the Sexual Politics of Innate Homosexuality’ in Vernon A Rosario (ed), Science and Homosexualities (Psychology Press 1997).10 Janet E Halley, ‘Sexual Orientation and the Politics of Biology: A Critique of the Argument from Immutability’ (1993) 46 Stanford Law Review 503; Edward Stein, ‘Sexual Orientations, Rights, and the Body: Immutability, Essentialism, and Nativism’ (2011) 78 Social Research: An International Quarterly 633.11 Dudgeon v UK (1981) Series A no 14, (1981) 4 EHRR 149.12 For a general account of the rise in constitutional litigation against the criminalisation of same-sex sexual conduct, see, Achim Hildebrandt, ‘Routes to Decriminalization: A Comparative Analy
摘要:鉴于同性性行为在全球范围内的诉讼激增,本文通过分析最近关于同性性行为刑事化的宪法判决,考察了关于性取向的先天性和病因学的解放性科学在同性恋权利的法律进步中所起的作用。站在比较宪法和科学技术研究的交叉点,它分析了2016年至2020年间,伯利兹、特立尼达和多巴哥、博茨瓦纳、印度、肯尼亚和新加坡六个司法管辖区对同性性行为定罪的判决是如何处理基于解放科学的论点的。本文以现有的关于解放科学在追求酷儿正义中的作用的学术研究为基础,展示了这种科学如何在同性性行为的合宪性的司法裁决中发挥了神话般的作用。除了它的经验和理论贡献外,这篇文章还提醒同性恋权利活动家和律师仔细考虑他们是否以及为什么打算在针对同性性行为的宪法诉讼中引入性取向科学。作者感谢Holly Doremus教授,他的科学和监管政策课程是本文早期版本的撰写对象,两位匿名审稿人的反馈和指导,以及期刊的编辑团队。所有错误归作者所有。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1《1860年印度刑法典》(1860年第45号法令),第377.2条Navtej Singh Johar诉印度联邦[2018]10 S.C.C. 1[143](首席大法官的多数意见)EG和其他7人诉司法部长;DKM等9人(利害关系人);3 . Katiba Institute & another(法院之友)(高等法院,2019)[393]《1948年肯尼亚刑法典》(第63章),第162条和第165.5条欢迎加入“真理胜出”的LGBT科学项目(由“真理胜出”指导,2013年),访问日期为2021.6年12月14日。同上7亨利·L·明顿,从越轨行为出发:美国同性恋权利和解放科学的历史(芝加哥大学出版社2001年)3.8同上2.9詹姆斯·斯蒂克利,《科学与正义》:《马格努斯·赫希菲尔德和先天同性恋的性政治》,收录于弗农·A·罗萨里奥(编),《科学与同性恋》(心理学出版社1997年)Janet E Halley,“性取向和生物学的政治:对不变性论点的批判”(1993),《斯坦福法律评论》第46期,第503期;Edward Stein,“性取向、权利和身体:不变性、本质主义和原生主义”(2011)78社会研究:国际季刊633.11 Dudgeon v UK (1981) Series A no . 14, (1981) 4 EHRR 149.12关于反对同性性行为刑事化的宪法诉讼增加的一般说明,见Achim Hildebrandt,“非刑事化之路:同性性行为合法化的比较分析”(2014)17 Sexualities 230;13 . angolitta Sperti,宪法法院,同性恋权利和性取向平等(Hart Publishing 2017Udi Sommer等人,“政策变化的制度路径:司法与非司法废除鸡奸法:政策变化的制度路径”(2013)47《法律与社会评论》409.14参见David L . Faigman,“规范的宪法事实发现”:探索宪法解释的经验成分”(1991)139宾夕法尼亚大学法律评论541;Dean M Hashimoto,“宪法中的科学神话”(1997)76 Oregon Law Review 111;Shawn Kolitch,“宪法事实发现和宪法评论中经验数据的适当使用”(2006)10 Lewis & Clark Law Review 673;Angelo N Ancheta,科学证据和平等保护的法律(罗格斯大学出版社2006);TK Naveen,“在宪法法院中使用“社会科学证据”:对印度司法程序的关注”(2006年),《印度法律研究所期刊》第78期;Jula Hughes和Vanessa MacDonnell,“德国和加拿大宪法权利案例中的社会科学证据:一些比较观察”(2013)32《国家宪法杂志》第23期;梅丽莎·汉密尔顿,“宪法和科学证据的作用:DOE诉斯奈德的变革潜力”(2017)58波士顿学院法律评论E.补编34;Ari Ezra Waldman,“宪法中的制造不确定性”(2022)91 Fordham Law Review 2249.15 Russell K Robinson和David M Frost,“与经验证据的“安全行事”:在最高法院关于种族正义和婚姻平等的案件中选择性地使用社会科学”(2018)112西北大学法律评论1565.16桥本(n 14) 116.17劳伦斯H部落,“通过伪科学筛子过滤宪法的七宗罪”(1984)36黑斯廷斯法律杂志155,170。 84戴蒙德和罗斯基(第54期)364.85罗宾逊和弗罗斯特(第15期)1590.86同上。87 1981年伯利兹宪法,第4章,第3、6、12和14.88 1981年伯利兹刑法典,第101章,第53.89卡莱布·奥罗斯科(第19期)[37]。90同上[36]。91同上[76]。92同上[81]。93同上[71]。94同上[72]-[73]。95同上[99]《1986年性犯罪法》第11章第28条,第13条和第16.98条,杰森·琼斯(第20条)[81]和[83]。99同上[164]。见Toonen诉澳大利亚,来文第488/1992号,联合国文件CCPR/C/50/D/488/1992(1994)。[91]。101同上。102同上。103 Naz Foundation v government of NCT of Delhi (2009) 111 D.R.J., 1.104 [2014] 1 S.C.C. 1.105同上。106印度宪法1950.107 Navtej (n 2) at para 4(首席大法官的多数意见)。108同上[9]。109同上。110同上[231]。111同上[143]-[144]。112同上[145]-[146]。113同上[143]。114同上[253(vii)].115高塔姆·巴蒂亚,“案例评论:纳夫特吉·辛格·乔哈尔诉印度联邦:印度最高法院的同性关系非刑事化”(2019)22马克斯·普朗克联合国法律年鉴在线218.116 Navtej (n 2)[229](首席大法官的多数意见)。117同上[237]。118同上[240]。119同上[13.1](Malhotra J的共同意见)。120同上[13.1]和[13.2]。121同上[14.5]。122同上[14.3][c] (c) (n 23)Gosego Rockfall Lekgowe,“博茨瓦纳同性恋权利的新曙光:对高等法院和上诉法院在Motshidiemang案件中的判决的评论”[2023]非洲法律杂志,第1期125 Letsweletse (HC) (n 23)[140]。126同上[143]。[144]。128同上[141]和[142]。129同上[169]。130同上[190]。131同上[33]。132同上[34]Letsweletse (CA) (n 23)。134同上[25]-[26]。博茨瓦纳刑法第167条的合宪性问题是由LEGABIBO以法庭之友而不是诉讼一方的身份提出的。因此,上诉法院认为,由于第167条不适合于高等法院审理,因此它不能下令删除该条款中的“私人”一词,直到
{"title":"<i>Per Scientiam ad Justitiam</i> ? The Mythical Role of Emancipatory Science in the Decriminalisation of Same-sex Sexual Conduct through Constitutional Litigation","authors":"Daryl W. J. Yang","doi":"10.1080/13200968.2023.2255937","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13200968.2023.2255937","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis article examines the role that emancipatory science on the innateness and aetiology of sexual orientation has played in the legal advancement of gay rights by analysing recent constitutional decisions on laws criminalising same-sex sexual conduct, in light of the global proliferation of such litigation. Standing at the intersection of comparative constitutional law and science and technology studies, it analyses how judgments on the criminalisation of same-sex sexual conduct across six jurisdictions, namely Belize, Trinidad and Tobago, Botswana, India, Kenya and Singapore, between 2016 and 2020, have dealt with arguments based on emancipatory science. Building on existing scholarship on the role of emancipatory science in the pursuit of queer justice, this article shows how such science has played a mythical role in judicial decisions on the constitutionality of same-sex sexual conduct. In addition to its empirical and theoretical contributions, this article cautions gay right activists and lawyers to carefully consider whether and why they intend to introduce the science of sexual orientation in constitutional litigation over laws criminalising same-sex sexual conduct. AcknowledgementsThe author is grateful to Professor Holly Doremus, whose class on science and regulatory policy an earlier version of this paper was written for, the two anonymous reviewers for their feedback and guidance, and the journal’s editorial team. All errors remain the author’s own.Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Indian Penal Code 1860 (Act 45 of 1860), s 377.2 Navtej Singh Johar v Union of India [2018] 10 S.C.C. 1 [143] (Plurality Opinion of the Chief Justice).3 EG & 7 others v Attorney General; DKM & 9 others (Interested Parties); Katiba Institute & another (Amicus Curiae) (High Court, 2019) [393].4 Kenyan Penal Code 1948 (Cap. 63), ss 162 and 165.5 Welcome to Truth Wins Out’s LGBT Science Project (Directed by Truth Wins Out, 2013) <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vrykpK_MpE8> accessed 14 December 2021.6 ibid.7 Henry L Minton, Departing from Deviance: A History of Homosexual Rights and Emancipatory Science in America (University of Chicago Press 2001) 3.8 ibid 2.9 James Steakley, ‘Per Scientiam Ad Justitiam: Magnus Hirschfeld and the Sexual Politics of Innate Homosexuality’ in Vernon A Rosario (ed), Science and Homosexualities (Psychology Press 1997).10 Janet E Halley, ‘Sexual Orientation and the Politics of Biology: A Critique of the Argument from Immutability’ (1993) 46 Stanford Law Review 503; Edward Stein, ‘Sexual Orientations, Rights, and the Body: Immutability, Essentialism, and Nativism’ (2011) 78 Social Research: An International Quarterly 633.11 Dudgeon v UK (1981) Series A no 14, (1981) 4 EHRR 149.12 For a general account of the rise in constitutional litigation against the criminalisation of same-sex sexual conduct, see, Achim Hildebrandt, ‘Routes to Decriminalization: A Comparative Analy","PeriodicalId":43532,"journal":{"name":"Australian Feminist Law Journal","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136312970","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}