Features of Public Administration Ensuring Security under the Legal Regime of Martial Law in Ukraine

Oleh Ilnytslyi
{"title":"Features of Public Administration Ensuring Security under the Legal Regime of Martial Law in Ukraine","authors":"Oleh Ilnytslyi","doi":"10.33327/ajee-18-6.1-a000109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The functioning of the state apparatus under the legal regime of martial law causes significant changes in both the organisational and procedural nature of public administration. \nMethods: The results of research on the functioning of the state apparatus under the conditions of the legal regime of martial law and practice materials in the form of published statistical and journalistic reports from open sources of information were processed using general scientific and special research methods.\nResults and Conclusions: As a result of this research, the following recommendations were formulated in the adaptation of public administration: the need to introduce clear distribution and definition of the competences of military and civil administration bodies, as well as the definition of further control mechanisms when granting an additional scope of powers to military and civil administration bodies under martial law conditions; ‘revisions’ regarding justification for the exercise of such powers; the implementation of restrictive measures of the legal regime of martial law should take place in a clear, legally defined sequence, taking into account the presence of a legitimate goal of their introduction with special attention to the issue of proportionality between the introduced restrictions and the results of their implementation to achieve the same goal; use of alternative means of communication with citizens with transparent (accessible) presentation of information to establish social dialogue and understanding between governing bodies and citizens; institutionalisation of such means of communication.","PeriodicalId":40329,"journal":{"name":"Access to Justice in Eastern Europe","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Access to Justice in Eastern Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33327/ajee-18-6.1-a000109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The functioning of the state apparatus under the legal regime of martial law causes significant changes in both the organisational and procedural nature of public administration. Methods: The results of research on the functioning of the state apparatus under the conditions of the legal regime of martial law and practice materials in the form of published statistical and journalistic reports from open sources of information were processed using general scientific and special research methods. Results and Conclusions: As a result of this research, the following recommendations were formulated in the adaptation of public administration: the need to introduce clear distribution and definition of the competences of military and civil administration bodies, as well as the definition of further control mechanisms when granting an additional scope of powers to military and civil administration bodies under martial law conditions; ‘revisions’ regarding justification for the exercise of such powers; the implementation of restrictive measures of the legal regime of martial law should take place in a clear, legally defined sequence, taking into account the presence of a legitimate goal of their introduction with special attention to the issue of proportionality between the introduced restrictions and the results of their implementation to achieve the same goal; use of alternative means of communication with citizens with transparent (accessible) presentation of information to establish social dialogue and understanding between governing bodies and citizens; institutionalisation of such means of communication.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乌克兰戒严法律制度下公共行政保障安全的特点
背景:戒严法律制度下国家机构的运作导致公共行政的组织和程序性质发生了重大变化。方法:采用一般科学和特殊研究方法,对戒严法律制度条件下国家机构运作的研究结果以及公开信息来源发布的统计和新闻报道形式的实践材料进行处理。结果和结论:由于这项研究,在公共行政的调整方面提出了以下建议:需要对军事和民事行政机构的权限进行明确的分配和定义,以及在戒严条件下赋予军事和民政机构额外权力时进一步控制机制的定义;”关于行使此类权力的正当性的修订;戒严法律制度的限制性措施的实施应按照明确的、法律规定的顺序进行,同时考虑到实施这些措施的合法目标的存在,并特别注意实施的限制措施与实现相同目标的实施结果之间的比例问题;使用与公民沟通的替代手段,透明(可获取)地提供信息,在管理机构和公民之间建立社会对话和理解;这种交流方式的制度化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
50.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Challenges of Legal Guarantees for the Enforcement of Arbitral Awards in International Commercial Cases Advancing Sustainable Justice through AI-Based Case Law Analysis The Implementation of Consensual Tenet in Modern Civil Procedure: Comparative Analysis of Court-Connected Settlement Procedures Applied in Austria, Lithuania, and Ukraine Human Trafficking in Western Balkan: Case Study of Kosovo Towards an Effective Legal Protection for Older Persons in the 21st Century: A Comparative Study of International Human Rights Law and Arab Constitutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1