Yeast biocontrol against green mold in pear orange postharvest

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Comunicata Scientiae Pub Date : 2023-06-19 DOI:10.14295/cs.v14.3963
Pablo Leal Rodrigues, Aline Gleyce Julião Bomfim, Welington Leal dos Santos, João Tiago Correia Oliveira, Keila Aparecida Moreira, J. R. Galvão, M. Pacheco
{"title":"Yeast biocontrol against green mold in pear orange postharvest","authors":"Pablo Leal Rodrigues, Aline Gleyce Julião Bomfim, Welington Leal dos Santos, João Tiago Correia Oliveira, Keila Aparecida Moreira, J. R. Galvão, M. Pacheco","doi":"10.14295/cs.v14.3963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of the enzyme β-1, 3-glucanase and the mechanisms of action produced by yeasts in the biological control ofgreen mold in post-harvest oranges of the pear variety. The Fully Casualized Delineation(FCD) was used. The results were submitted to analysis of variance (ANOVA), in triplicate,compared with Tukey's test at a 5% probability level (p < 0.05), using the statisticalsoftware Sisvar. It was found that the killer activity was observed in 85.7% of the yeastsevaluated. The yeast Candida peltata URM4681 showed better production of β-1.3-glucanase, between 1.071 and 5.422 µg mL -1 . A factorial delineation 2 3 was used in amedium composed of yeast extract, soybean extract and meat extract to increaseenzymatic production, reaching an increase of 4.351 times comparing the assay of lowerand higher activity. The in situ assays showed a reduction in the number of infected fruitstreated with the enzymatic extract, being on average 78.5% when compared with thecontrol treatment (distilled water). As for sporulation, the enzymatic extract, which had anaverage of 8.4 spores, did not differ statistically from the IMZ and TBZ fungicides, both in apreventive and curative manner. Regarding the severity of the disease, it was noted thatthe fruits treated with enzymatic extract, had an average damage of 7.57 %, also notdiffering statistically from fungicides, both preventive and curative. Our studies suggestthat C. peltata URM4681, makes this a good candidate for biocontrol against green mold.","PeriodicalId":38570,"journal":{"name":"Comunicata Scientiae","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comunicata Scientiae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14295/cs.v14.3963","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of the enzyme β-1, 3-glucanase and the mechanisms of action produced by yeasts in the biological control ofgreen mold in post-harvest oranges of the pear variety. The Fully Casualized Delineation(FCD) was used. The results were submitted to analysis of variance (ANOVA), in triplicate,compared with Tukey's test at a 5% probability level (p < 0.05), using the statisticalsoftware Sisvar. It was found that the killer activity was observed in 85.7% of the yeastsevaluated. The yeast Candida peltata URM4681 showed better production of β-1.3-glucanase, between 1.071 and 5.422 µg mL -1 . A factorial delineation 2 3 was used in amedium composed of yeast extract, soybean extract and meat extract to increaseenzymatic production, reaching an increase of 4.351 times comparing the assay of lowerand higher activity. The in situ assays showed a reduction in the number of infected fruitstreated with the enzymatic extract, being on average 78.5% when compared with thecontrol treatment (distilled water). As for sporulation, the enzymatic extract, which had anaverage of 8.4 spores, did not differ statistically from the IMZ and TBZ fungicides, both in apreventive and curative manner. Regarding the severity of the disease, it was noted thatthe fruits treated with enzymatic extract, had an average damage of 7.57 %, also notdiffering statistically from fungicides, both preventive and curative. Our studies suggestthat C. peltata URM4681, makes this a good candidate for biocontrol against green mold.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
梨橙采后酵母对绿霉菌的生物防治
本研究的目的是评估β-1,3-葡聚糖酶的效率以及酵母产生的作用机制,以生物控制梨品种采后柑橘中的绿霉菌。使用了完全随意描绘(FCD)。使用统计软件Sisvar,将结果提交给方差分析(ANOVA),一式三份,与5%概率水平下的Tukey检验进行比较(p<0.05)。结果发现,85.7%的酵母具有杀伤活性。毛皮假丝酵母URM4681表现出更好的β-1.3-葡聚糖酶产量,在1.071和5.422µg mL-1之间。在酵母提取物、大豆提取物和肉提取物组成的阿米巴中使用因子描绘2 3来提高酶的产量,与低活性和高活性的测定相比,酶的产量增加了4.351倍。原位测定显示,与对照处理(蒸馏水)相比,用酶提取物处理的受感染果实数量减少,平均为78.5%。至于孢子形成,酶提取物平均有8.4个孢子,在预防和治疗方面与IMZ和TBZ杀菌剂没有统计学差异。关于疾病的严重程度,值得注意的是,用酶提取物处理的水果的平均损伤为7.57%,在预防和治疗方面与杀菌剂也没有统计学差异。我们的研究表明,C.pelta URM4681使其成为生物防治绿霉菌的良好候选者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Comunicata Scientiae
Comunicata Scientiae Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: The Comunicata Scientiae journal edited by Campus “Profa Cinobelina Elvas” of Federal University of Piauí (Brazil) publishes original articles, scientific notes and review articles (when invited by the editorial board), which present significant importance for Agrarian and Environmental Sciences in Portuguese, Spanish and preferentially, in English.
期刊最新文献
Morphophysiology of Punica Granatum L. under microalgae biomass stimulation Profitability and efficiency of conduction systems and optimal tomato density for fresh consumption Efficiency and economic viability of water management in the production of table tomatoes Agronomic performance and fruit sensory and quality analyses of pineapple cultivars Intercropping lettuce and radish as strategy for efficient water use: determination of water demand and crop coefficient
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1