Power in consensus: Legitimacy, global value chains and inequality in telecommunications standard-setting

IF 2.5 2区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Global Networks-A Journal of Transnational Affairs Pub Date : 2023-02-21 DOI:10.1111/glob.12436
Mark P. Dallas, Jing-Ming Shiu
{"title":"Power in consensus: Legitimacy, global value chains and inequality in telecommunications standard-setting","authors":"Mark P. Dallas,&nbsp;Jing-Ming Shiu","doi":"10.1111/glob.12436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Power is central to GVC research, but the concept is usually restricted to ‘direct’ market power that generates rents. This paper examines ‘diffuse’ conceptualizations of power in GVCs that focus on social construction, arguing that they exist along a continuum from ‘fractured’ to ‘encompassing’. Then, empirically, it shows how different types of power intermix in telecommunications standard-setting from 1999 to 2021, using a comprehensive dataset of every finalized work item in 3GPP. Given powerful network effects in telecommunications, the industry is ripe for monopolistic rents and unequal value capture on a global scale. However, these are attenuated by a layering of power relations, and particularly, an intermediary form of social construction – legitimacy – which is the primary driver of telecommunications standard-setting, and a new type of constitutive power in GVCs, alongside governmentality and hegemony. This is illustrated by focusing on two major shifts in legitimacy in 3GPP – the rise of Huawei and network operators. The paper shows how power becomes layered with collective forms of power partially neutralizing inter-firm forms of dyadic power, which attenuates monopolistic value capture.</p>","PeriodicalId":47882,"journal":{"name":"Global Networks-A Journal of Transnational Affairs","volume":"23 4","pages":"792-813"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Networks-A Journal of Transnational Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/glob.12436","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Power is central to GVC research, but the concept is usually restricted to ‘direct’ market power that generates rents. This paper examines ‘diffuse’ conceptualizations of power in GVCs that focus on social construction, arguing that they exist along a continuum from ‘fractured’ to ‘encompassing’. Then, empirically, it shows how different types of power intermix in telecommunications standard-setting from 1999 to 2021, using a comprehensive dataset of every finalized work item in 3GPP. Given powerful network effects in telecommunications, the industry is ripe for monopolistic rents and unequal value capture on a global scale. However, these are attenuated by a layering of power relations, and particularly, an intermediary form of social construction – legitimacy – which is the primary driver of telecommunications standard-setting, and a new type of constitutive power in GVCs, alongside governmentality and hegemony. This is illustrated by focusing on two major shifts in legitimacy in 3GPP – the rise of Huawei and network operators. The paper shows how power becomes layered with collective forms of power partially neutralizing inter-firm forms of dyadic power, which attenuates monopolistic value capture.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共识中的力量:合法性、全球价值链和电信标准制定中的不平等
权力是全球价值链研究的核心,但这个概念通常仅限于产生租金的“直接”市场权力。本文考察了全球价值链中关注社会建设的权力的“扩散”概念,认为它们存在于从“断裂”到“包容”的连续体中。然后,利用3GPP中每个最终确定的工作项目的综合数据集,从经验上显示了1999年至2021年电信标准制定中不同类型的权力是如何混合的。鉴于电信业强大的网络效应,该行业在全球范围内出现垄断租金和不平等价值获取的时机已经成熟。然而,权力关系的分层,特别是社会建构的中间形式——合法性——削弱了这些权力,合法性是电信标准制定的主要驱动力,也是全球价值链中一种新型的构成权力,以及治理和霸权。这一点可以通过关注3GPP合法性的两大转变来说明——华为和网络运营商的崛起。本文展示了权力是如何分层的,集体形式的权力部分中和了企业间形式的二元权力,从而减弱了垄断的价值获取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
57
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Digital Technologies on the Transnational Aging Experience of Older Hong Kongers The Welfare System in the Face of War Refugees From Ukraine: The Experience of Social Workers in Poland Changed Reality, Changed Positions: The Case Study of Eritrean Women Refugees in Times of Global Pandemic Issue Information Promoting Good Governance Through Transnational Projects: A Study of Swedish Funding in Russia 1991–2005
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1