Mastery motivation in Iranian parents and their children: A comparison study of their views

M. Gharib, R. Vameghi, S. Hosseini, Vahid Rashedi, Hasan Siamian, G. Morgan
{"title":"Mastery motivation in Iranian parents and their children: A comparison study of their views","authors":"M. Gharib, R. Vameghi, S. Hosseini, Vahid Rashedi, Hasan Siamian, G. Morgan","doi":"10.4103/JNMS.JNMS_20_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: The Dimensions of Mastery Questionnaire has been widely used to assess children's motivation to master skills and solve problems. Aims: The present study examined Iranian parents' views on the mastery motivation of their children compared with the children's views of their own mastery motivation. Setting and Design: This analytic cross-sectional and psychometric study was done in 2017-2018 in Iranian governmental regular schools in Sari, Babol (Mazandaran) and Tehran. 11 schools (5 Tehran, 3 Sari and 3 Babol) were selected based on cooperation and acceptance of the study. Materials and Methods: A convenience sampling of 114 families with schoolage children was invited to participate in the present study. Fathers (33.7%) or mothers (69.7%) and their 1115 yearold children (67% boys) filled the questionnaires; 42 parents and 33 children were asked to refill questionnaires after 2 weeks. Statistical Analysis Used: All data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, inferential internal consistency, and testretest reliability. Results: There was no difference between parent and child views on 3 out of 4 persistence subscales, but for all the emotional subscales plus general competence, children rated themselves higher than the parents rated them. The intraclass correlation coefficient of all domains and total score were significant (P 0.01). Conclusions: Pediatric rehabilitation professionals need to be aware that children and adults may differ in their view of the children's motivation. Disagreements should be discussed with parents and students. Specific treatment goals should be developed for the dimensions on which both parents and their children agree.","PeriodicalId":42130,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Sciences","volume":"8 1","pages":"54 - 60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JNMS.JNMS_20_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: The Dimensions of Mastery Questionnaire has been widely used to assess children's motivation to master skills and solve problems. Aims: The present study examined Iranian parents' views on the mastery motivation of their children compared with the children's views of their own mastery motivation. Setting and Design: This analytic cross-sectional and psychometric study was done in 2017-2018 in Iranian governmental regular schools in Sari, Babol (Mazandaran) and Tehran. 11 schools (5 Tehran, 3 Sari and 3 Babol) were selected based on cooperation and acceptance of the study. Materials and Methods: A convenience sampling of 114 families with schoolage children was invited to participate in the present study. Fathers (33.7%) or mothers (69.7%) and their 1115 yearold children (67% boys) filled the questionnaires; 42 parents and 33 children were asked to refill questionnaires after 2 weeks. Statistical Analysis Used: All data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, inferential internal consistency, and testretest reliability. Results: There was no difference between parent and child views on 3 out of 4 persistence subscales, but for all the emotional subscales plus general competence, children rated themselves higher than the parents rated them. The intraclass correlation coefficient of all domains and total score were significant (P 0.01). Conclusions: Pediatric rehabilitation professionals need to be aware that children and adults may differ in their view of the children's motivation. Disagreements should be discussed with parents and students. Specific treatment goals should be developed for the dimensions on which both parents and their children agree.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊朗父母及其子女掌握动机的比较研究
背景:掌握维度问卷已被广泛用于评估儿童掌握技能和解决问题的动机。目的:本研究考察了伊朗父母对孩子掌握动机的看法,并与孩子对自己掌握动机的观点进行了比较。设置和设计:这项分析性横断面和心理测量研究于2017-2018年在萨里、巴博尔(马赞德兰)和德黑兰的伊朗政府普通学校进行。根据对研究的合作和接受程度,选择了11所学校(5所德黑兰、3所萨里和3所巴波尔)。材料和方法:本研究邀请了114个有学龄儿童的家庭参加。父亲(33.7%)或母亲(69.7%)及其1115岁的孩子(67%为男孩)填写了问卷;42名家长和33名儿童被要求在两周后重新填写问卷。使用的统计分析:所有数据都使用描述性统计、推断内部一致性和测试-再测试可靠性进行分析。结果:父母和孩子对4个持久性分量表中的3个分量表的看法没有差异,但在所有情绪分量表加上一般能力的分量表中,孩子对自己的评价都高于父母。所有领域的组内相关系数和总分均显著(P<0.01)。结论:儿科康复专业人员需要意识到,儿童和成人对儿童动机的看法可能不同。意见分歧应与家长和学生讨论。应针对父母和子女双方同意的维度制定具体的治疗目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparing the Effects of Oral and Vaginal Evening Primrose Capsules with Concurrent Labor Induction and Exclusive Labor Induction on Bishop Score and Some Labor Outcomes: A Triple-Blind Clinical Trial Social Determinants of Reproductive Age Women's Sexual Health: A Scoping Review Effect of Collaborative Care on Fear of Disease Progression in Multiple Sclerosis Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparison of Quality of Infant Care and Transition Difficulty to Motherhood Between Adolescent and Young Mothers in Karaj, Iran Providing Nursing Care to Patients with Mental Disorders Based on King's Goal Attainment Theory: A Quasi-Experimental Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1