Insecticidal and antifungal effects of lemon, orange, and grapefruit peel essential oils from Argentina

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences AgriScientia Pub Date : 2022-06-30 DOI:10.31047/1668.298x.v39.n1.33777
Fernanda Achimón, Laura E. Leal, R. P. Pizzolitto, V. D. Brito, R. Alarcon, A. Omarini, J. Zygadlo
{"title":"Insecticidal and antifungal effects of lemon, orange, and grapefruit peel essential oils from Argentina","authors":"Fernanda Achimón, Laura E. Leal, R. P. Pizzolitto, V. D. Brito, R. Alarcon, A. Omarini, J. Zygadlo","doi":"10.31047/1668.298x.v39.n1.33777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the present work was to study the bioactivity of lemon, orange, and grapefruit peel essential oils (EOs) obtained from Argentinian plantations on different agronomically important insect and fungal species. The chemical profile of EOs was determined by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS); the insecticidal activity was studied through contact and fumigant assays; the antifungal activity was evaluated with fumigant tests. Orange EO was the most effective against Rhyzopertha dominica, Oryzaephilus spp. and Sitophilus granarius in fumigation tests (LC50= 89.39, 94.50, and 163.64 µL/L air, respectively); while the insecticidal effect of EOs was species-dependent in contact toxicity assays. Regarding antifungal activity, Rhizoctonia solanii was more susceptible than Sclerotium rolfsii to the tested EOs, with lemon from Industry 1 and orange being the most toxic EOs (MIC=10.77 µL/plate and 11.02 µL/plate, respectively). Conversely, S. rolfsii was strongly inhibited by lemon EO from Industry 2 (MIC= 52.40 µL/plate). Besides limonene, other compounds that could be responsible for these bioactivities were: linalool, carvone, α-pinene, β-pinene, β-myrcene, α-terpineol, terpinen-4-ol, limonene oxide, β-phellandrene, γ-terpinene, sabinene, neral, neryl acetate, β-caryophyllene and p-cymene. Citrus peel EOs can be used against different pests, contributing to the valorization of citrus residues.","PeriodicalId":39278,"journal":{"name":"AgriScientia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AgriScientia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31047/1668.298x.v39.n1.33777","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The aim of the present work was to study the bioactivity of lemon, orange, and grapefruit peel essential oils (EOs) obtained from Argentinian plantations on different agronomically important insect and fungal species. The chemical profile of EOs was determined by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS); the insecticidal activity was studied through contact and fumigant assays; the antifungal activity was evaluated with fumigant tests. Orange EO was the most effective against Rhyzopertha dominica, Oryzaephilus spp. and Sitophilus granarius in fumigation tests (LC50= 89.39, 94.50, and 163.64 µL/L air, respectively); while the insecticidal effect of EOs was species-dependent in contact toxicity assays. Regarding antifungal activity, Rhizoctonia solanii was more susceptible than Sclerotium rolfsii to the tested EOs, with lemon from Industry 1 and orange being the most toxic EOs (MIC=10.77 µL/plate and 11.02 µL/plate, respectively). Conversely, S. rolfsii was strongly inhibited by lemon EO from Industry 2 (MIC= 52.40 µL/plate). Besides limonene, other compounds that could be responsible for these bioactivities were: linalool, carvone, α-pinene, β-pinene, β-myrcene, α-terpineol, terpinen-4-ol, limonene oxide, β-phellandrene, γ-terpinene, sabinene, neral, neryl acetate, β-caryophyllene and p-cymene. Citrus peel EOs can be used against different pests, contributing to the valorization of citrus residues.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿根廷柠檬、桔子和柚子皮精油的杀虫和抗真菌作用
本工作的目的是研究从阿根廷种植园获得的柠檬、橙子和葡萄柚皮精油(EOs)对不同农业重要昆虫和真菌物种的生物活性。采用气相色谱-质谱法(GC/MS)测定EOs的化学性质;通过接触和熏蒸试验研究了其杀虫活性;通过熏蒸试验评价其抗真菌活性。在熏蒸试验中,橙色EO对稻瘟病菌、稻瘟病菌和石榴实蝇最为有效(LC50分别为89.39、94.50和163.64µL/L空气);而EOs的杀虫作用在接触毒性测定中是物种依赖性的。关于抗真菌活性,纹枯核菌比核枯核菌对测试的EOs更敏感,来自工业1的柠檬和橙子是毒性最强的EOs(MIC分别为10.77µL/板和11.02µL/盘)。相反,S.rolfsii被来自Industry 2的柠檬EO强烈抑制(MIC=52.40µL/板)。除柠檬烯外,其他可能具有这些生物活性的化合物有:芳樟醇、香芹酮、α-蒎烯、β-蒎ne、β-月桂烯、α-萜品醇、萜品烯-4-醇、氧化柠檬烯、β-phellandrene、γ-萜品烯、sabinene、general、neryl acetate、β-石竹烯和p-cymene。柑橘皮EOs可用于对付不同的害虫,有助于柑橘残留物的增值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AgriScientia
AgriScientia Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: AgriScientia es una revista de acceso abierto, de carácter científico-académico, gestionada por el Área de Difusión Científica de la Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias de la Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina. La revista recibe artículos en los idiomas español e inglés. El objetivo de esta publicación es la difusión de los resultados de investigaciones de carácter agronómico. Está destinada a investigadores, estudiantes de pregrado, grado y posgrado, profesionales en el área de las ciencias agropecuarias y público en general interesado en las temáticas relacionadas. Su periodicidad es semestral. Los artículos se reciben durante todo el año. Los tipos de documentos que se publican son artículos científicos, comunicaciones y revisiones.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of land use change in the dryland agricultural region of Córdoba, Argentina, between 2000 and 2020 based on NDVI data Impacto ambiental de las aplicaciones de fitosanitarios en producciones ornamentales intensivas en el partido de Moreno, provincia de Buenos Aires Selección de cepas bacterianas con capacidad antifúngica contra fitopatógenos de alfalfa para constituir un consorcio bacteriano Evaluating Nitrogen Release Rates of Commercial Slow-Release Urea Products Using Brix Value Analysis: A Validation Study Comparing Two Methods Aportes a la morfología de semillas de Hibiscus cannabinus L. y ajuste de la prueba de tetrazolio para estimar viabilidad y vigor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1