The Relationship Between Proof and Certainty in Mathematical Practice

IF 3.5 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5951/jresematheduc-2020-0034
{"title":"The Relationship Between Proof and Certainty in Mathematical Practice","authors":"","doi":"10.5951/jresematheduc-2020-0034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many mathematics educators believe a goal of instruction is for students to obtain conviction and certainty in mathematical statements using the same types of evidence that mathematicians do. However, few empirical studies have examined how mathematicians use proofs to obtain conviction and certainty. We report on a study in which 16 advanced mathematics doctoral students were given a task-based interview in which they were presented with various sources of evidence in support of a specific mathematical claim and were asked how convinced they were that the claim was true after reviewing this evidence. In particular, we explore why our participants retained doubts about our claim after reading its proof and how they used empirical evidence to reduce those doubts.","PeriodicalId":48084,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Research in Mathematics Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Research in Mathematics Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc-2020-0034","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Many mathematics educators believe a goal of instruction is for students to obtain conviction and certainty in mathematical statements using the same types of evidence that mathematicians do. However, few empirical studies have examined how mathematicians use proofs to obtain conviction and certainty. We report on a study in which 16 advanced mathematics doctoral students were given a task-based interview in which they were presented with various sources of evidence in support of a specific mathematical claim and were asked how convinced they were that the claim was true after reviewing this evidence. In particular, we explore why our participants retained doubts about our claim after reading its proof and how they used empirical evidence to reduce those doubts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数学实践中证明与确定性的关系
许多数学教育家认为,教学的目标是让学生使用与数学家相同类型的证据,在数学陈述中获得确信和确定性。然而,很少有实证研究考察数学家如何使用证明来获得确信和确定。我们报道了一项研究,在该研究中,16名高等数学博士生接受了一次基于任务的访谈,在访谈中,他们获得了支持特定数学主张的各种证据来源,并被问及在审查这些证据后,他们对该主张是真的有多确信。特别是,我们探讨了为什么我们的参与者在阅读证据后仍然对我们的主张持怀疑态度,以及他们如何使用经验证据来减少这些怀疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Research in Mathematics Education
Journal for Research in Mathematics Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
17.90%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: An official journal of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM), JRME is the premier research journal in mathematics education and is devoted to the interests of teachers and researchers at all levels--preschool through college. JRME is a forum for disciplined inquiry into the teaching and learning of mathematics. The editors encourage submissions including: -Research reports, addressing important research questions and issues in mathematics education, -Brief reports of research, -Research commentaries on issues pertaining to mathematics education research, and -Book reviews.
期刊最新文献
“Prove Yourself”: Exploring Epistemological Values in Mathematics Department Support and Oppression of Black Women Faculty Classroom Supports for Generalizing Reproducing Research Capacity Through Interinstitutional Collaboration Around Doctoral Courses A Validity Argument for a Brief Assessment of Mature Number Sense Meta-Aggregation: Methodological Guidance and Lessons Learned on an Approach to Qualitative Synthesis for Mathematics Education Research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1