Criollo archival recoveries after independence

Wendy Muñiz
{"title":"Criollo archival recoveries after independence","authors":"Wendy Muñiz","doi":"10.1080/14788810.2021.2002603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article examines Dominican criollo archive-building during the country’s Second Republic (1865–1916). I investigate the 1889 Historical Controversy, a prolonged dispute over the role general Pedro Santana would play in the national mythology, calling attention to the elite’s nineteenth-century debates over the meaning of emancipation records and the political value of archive-making. Building on Chelsea Stieber’s research on post-independence Haitian writing, I contrast what I call the controversy’s “archival wars” to the lives of Rosa Duarte’s archive in 1890s periodical culture. I focus on the figure of Federico Henríquez y Carvajal to demonstrate how, after the historical controversy, among criollo intellectuals the normalists routinely collected emancipation records in the press to institutionalize white supremacist nationalist narratives. The two cases reveal how criollo intellectuals pursued Ibero-Americanism on the basis of “fact,” thereby opening studies on Caribbean nationalisms to inquiries into elite archival recoveries.","PeriodicalId":44108,"journal":{"name":"Atlantic Studies-Global Currents","volume":"20 1","pages":"177 - 193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atlantic Studies-Global Currents","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14788810.2021.2002603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article examines Dominican criollo archive-building during the country’s Second Republic (1865–1916). I investigate the 1889 Historical Controversy, a prolonged dispute over the role general Pedro Santana would play in the national mythology, calling attention to the elite’s nineteenth-century debates over the meaning of emancipation records and the political value of archive-making. Building on Chelsea Stieber’s research on post-independence Haitian writing, I contrast what I call the controversy’s “archival wars” to the lives of Rosa Duarte’s archive in 1890s periodical culture. I focus on the figure of Federico Henríquez y Carvajal to demonstrate how, after the historical controversy, among criollo intellectuals the normalists routinely collected emancipation records in the press to institutionalize white supremacist nationalist narratives. The two cases reveal how criollo intellectuals pursued Ibero-Americanism on the basis of “fact,” thereby opening studies on Caribbean nationalisms to inquiries into elite archival recoveries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
独立后的Criollo档案恢复
摘要本文考察了多米尼加第二共和国(1865–1916)时期的克里奥洛档案馆建筑。我调查了1889年的历史争议,这是一场关于佩德罗·桑塔纳将军在国家神话中扮演的角色的长期争议,引起了人们对19世纪精英们关于解放记录的意义和档案制作的政治价值的辩论的关注。在Chelsea Stieber对独立后海地写作的研究基础上,我将我所称的争议性的“档案战争”与Rosa Duarte档案在19世纪90年代期刊文化中的生活进行了对比。我关注费德里科·亨里克斯和卡瓦哈尔的形象,以展示在历史争议之后,在克里奥尔知识分子中,正常主义者如何在媒体上定期收集解放记录,以将白人至上主义民族主义叙事制度化。这两个案例揭示了克里奥尔知识分子是如何在“事实”的基础上追求伊比利亚-美洲主义的,从而使对加勒比民族主义的研究向精英档案追回的调查开放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Continental divide: Native Americans and the Atlantic world Scottish loyalism in the British Atlantic world “Without the smallest recompense”: Scottish loyalist women in revolutionary North Carolina “All grand tories:” Loyalism in the trans-Appalachian west during the revolutionary war “When I saw the skull approaching, I died”: Transatlantic communicative flows in response to racial terror in Brazil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1