Understanding writing curriculum innovation in Grades 7-12 in Chile: Linking teachers´ beliefs and practices

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Writing Research Pub Date : 2022-02-01 DOI:10.17239/jowr-2022.13.03.02
M. Flores-Ferrés, D. van Weijen, Gert Rijlaarsdam
{"title":"Understanding writing curriculum innovation in Grades 7-12 in Chile: Linking teachers´ beliefs and practices","authors":"M. Flores-Ferrés, D. van Weijen, Gert Rijlaarsdam","doi":"10.17239/jowr-2022.13.03.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": This study aimed to provide evidence for continuing the innovation of writing instruction in Grades 7-12 of Chilean public schools. Teachers' beliefs influence their curricular interpretations; therefore, these beliefs play a key role when aiming for educational innovation. Hence, we investigated the relations between Language teachers’ current practices of implementing the national curriculum and their beliefs regarding five paradigms of Language instruction. While beliefs on writing instruction are possibly embedded in beliefs on the broader topic of Language instruction, we took this broader category into account. We obtained 182 completed surveys from teachers of all Chilean regions (response rate: 47%). Teachers reported a rather strong adherence to four curricular paradigms both in terms of practices and beliefs, while the fifth, the communicative paradigm, demonstrated a low level of adherence. The strength of the implementation of teachers´ practices of writing instruction seemed to be related to teachers´ beliefs, about writing and more general aspects as well. The results suggest that policymakers must focus public efforts on reinforcing teachers’ beliefs regarding writing instruction, especially regarding communicative writing and on the connections between the five paradigms. In addition, we recommend that public efforts prioritize improvements in Grades 9-12 over Grades 7-8.","PeriodicalId":45632,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Writing Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Writing Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2022.13.03.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

: This study aimed to provide evidence for continuing the innovation of writing instruction in Grades 7-12 of Chilean public schools. Teachers' beliefs influence their curricular interpretations; therefore, these beliefs play a key role when aiming for educational innovation. Hence, we investigated the relations between Language teachers’ current practices of implementing the national curriculum and their beliefs regarding five paradigms of Language instruction. While beliefs on writing instruction are possibly embedded in beliefs on the broader topic of Language instruction, we took this broader category into account. We obtained 182 completed surveys from teachers of all Chilean regions (response rate: 47%). Teachers reported a rather strong adherence to four curricular paradigms both in terms of practices and beliefs, while the fifth, the communicative paradigm, demonstrated a low level of adherence. The strength of the implementation of teachers´ practices of writing instruction seemed to be related to teachers´ beliefs, about writing and more general aspects as well. The results suggest that policymakers must focus public efforts on reinforcing teachers’ beliefs regarding writing instruction, especially regarding communicative writing and on the connections between the five paradigms. In addition, we recommend that public efforts prioritize improvements in Grades 9-12 over Grades 7-8.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理解智利7-12年级的写作课程创新:将教师的信仰和实践联系起来
:本研究旨在为智利公立学校7-12年级继续创新写作教学提供证据。教师的信仰影响他们对课程的理解;因此,这些信念在教育创新中起着关键作用。因此,我们调查了语文教师目前实施国家课程的实践与他们对五种语文教学范式的信念之间的关系。虽然对写作教学的信念可能嵌入对语言教学这一更广泛主题的信念中,但我们考虑了这一更广阔的类别。我们从智利所有地区的教师那里获得了182份完整的调查(回复率:47%)。教师们报告说,在实践和信念方面,他们对四种课程范式的坚持程度相当高,而第五种,即交际范式,则表现出低水平的坚持。教师写作教学实践的实施力度似乎与教师的信念、写作以及更普遍的方面有关。研究结果表明,决策者必须将公共努力集中在强化教师对写作教学的信念上,特别是在交际写作和五种范式之间的联系方面。此外,我们建议公众努力优先改善9-12年级,而不是7-8年级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Writing Research
Journal of Writing Research EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.90%
发文量
16
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Writing Research is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes high quality theoretical, empirical, and review papers covering the broad spectrum of writing research. The Journal primarily publishes papers that describe scientific studies of the processes by which writing is produced or the means by which writing can be effectively taught. The journal is inherently cross-disciplinary, publishing original research in the different domains of writing research. The Journal of Writing Research is an open access journal (no reader fee - no author fee).
期刊最新文献
Book review | Technology in second language writing: Advances in composing, translation, writing pedagogy and data-driven learning Fleshing out your text: How elaboration and contextualization moves differentially predict writing quality Thinking outside the box: Senior scientists’ metacognitive strategy knowledge and self-regulation of writing for science communication Synthesis Writing in Science Orientation Classes: An Instructional Design Studio Advancing Civics-specific Disciplinary Writing in the Elementary Grades issue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1