Střední článek ve vzdělávání: vymezení pojmu, přístupy a implikace pro vzdělávací politiku

Q4 Social Sciences Orbis Scholae Pub Date : 2021-11-03 DOI:10.14712/23363177.2021.12
Arnošt Veselý
{"title":"Střední článek ve vzdělávání: vymezení pojmu, přístupy a implikace pro vzdělávací politiku","authors":"Arnošt Veselý","doi":"10.14712/23363177.2021.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of “middle layer” (ML) is one of the most frequent terms in current education policy. Yet, the literature on the topic is fragmented and the concept itself is defined in several different ways which hinders effective discussion. The main goals of the article are as follows: 1) to imbed current discussion in the scholar literature and provide basic overview of scholar literature; 2) clarify the terminology and delimit various meanings of the “middle layer” concept. The article is structured as follows. First, the methodology of literature review is described. Then the basic meaning of ML in various educational systems is explained. In the next part of the paper, the literature review on ML is provided. In so doing, two strands of literature are distinguished. While the research-oriented strand focuses on analysis of what ML does (and does not), the practical stream relates to what ML should (or should not) do. Based on previous analysis, the paper argues that four meanings of middle layer can be delimited. These meanings are shortly labelled as follows: (a) a loose network of local actors; (b) a coordinated and interacting system of actors; (c) an organized set of several core local organizations; (d) a regional public administration institution. These four definitions are defined and explained. The article concludes with several implications for educational policy in the Czech Republic.","PeriodicalId":38228,"journal":{"name":"Orbis Scholae","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orbis Scholae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/23363177.2021.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The concept of “middle layer” (ML) is one of the most frequent terms in current education policy. Yet, the literature on the topic is fragmented and the concept itself is defined in several different ways which hinders effective discussion. The main goals of the article are as follows: 1) to imbed current discussion in the scholar literature and provide basic overview of scholar literature; 2) clarify the terminology and delimit various meanings of the “middle layer” concept. The article is structured as follows. First, the methodology of literature review is described. Then the basic meaning of ML in various educational systems is explained. In the next part of the paper, the literature review on ML is provided. In so doing, two strands of literature are distinguished. While the research-oriented strand focuses on analysis of what ML does (and does not), the practical stream relates to what ML should (or should not) do. Based on previous analysis, the paper argues that four meanings of middle layer can be delimited. These meanings are shortly labelled as follows: (a) a loose network of local actors; (b) a coordinated and interacting system of actors; (c) an organized set of several core local organizations; (d) a regional public administration institution. These four definitions are defined and explained. The article concludes with several implications for educational policy in the Czech Republic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教育中篇:概念的定义、方法和对教育政策的影响
“中间层”(ML)的概念是当前教育政策中最常见的术语之一。然而,关于这一主题的文献是零散的,概念本身有几种不同的定义,这阻碍了有效的讨论。本文的主要目的是:1)将当前的讨论嵌入学者文学,提供学者文学的基本概述;2) 澄清术语,界定“中间层”概念的各种含义。这篇文章的结构如下。首先,介绍了文献综述的方法论。然后解释了ML在各种教育系统中的基本含义。在论文的下一部分,提供了关于ML的文献综述。在这样做的过程中,两股文学是不同的。以研究为导向的流侧重于分析ML做什么(和不做什么),而实际流则与ML应该做什么(或不应该做什么)有关。这些含义很快被标记为:(a)松散的地方行动者网络;(b) 一个协调和互动的行动者系统;(c) 由几个核心地方组织组成的有组织的集合;(d) 一个地区性的公共行政机构。对这四个定义进行了定义和解释。文章最后对捷克共和国的教育政策提出了几点建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Orbis Scholae
Orbis Scholae Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
S Eliškou Walterovou o minulosti a budoucnosti časopisu Orbis scholae Sociální klima učitelských sborů: Kvalitativní kvaziexperiment Sexualita jako riziko? Sexuální výchova v českých kurikulárních dokumentech Zpráva z desáté Mezinárodní vědecké konference Mezinárodní asociace pro hodnocení výsledků vzdělávání. Dublin, 27.−30. června 2023 Evropská unie v učebnicích občanského vzdělávání: limity, inovace a výzvy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1