M. Longacre, Marcin Chwistek, M. Collins, Michelle Odelberg, Mark Siemon, Cindy A. Keleher, C. Fang
{"title":"Palliative Care Clinicians' Perspectives of an Integrated Caregiver Patient-Portal System in Oncology.","authors":"M. Longacre, Marcin Chwistek, M. Collins, Michelle Odelberg, Mark Siemon, Cindy A. Keleher, C. Fang","doi":"10.1097/cr9.0000000000000014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nDespite recommendations and policies to integrate family caregivers into U.S. healthcare settings, caregivers are not systematically involved. Thus, we developed an Integrated Caregiver Patient-Portal system that (1) allows a patient to identify their primary caregiver and their communication preferences; (2) connects the caregiver to a unique portal page to indicate their needs; and 3) informs the care team of dyad responses to aid in integrating the caregiver.\n\n\nObjective\nThis formative research explored palliative care clinicians' perceptions of the system to inform refinements before usability testing.\n\n\nMethods\nWe conducted two focus groups with palliative care clinicians (N=11) at an NCI-designated cancer center. Transcripts were analyzed using an integrated approach to specify system benefits and concerns.\n\n\nResults\nThe most referenced benefits included: Learning information that they might not have known without the system; giving caregivers a voice or a way to express needs; and supporting an ideal model of care. Top concerns included lacking capacity to respond; needing to clarify clinician roles and expertise in responding to caregivers' needs; and ensuring ongoing system adaptability.\n\n\nConclusions\nThe clinicians' feedback resulted in revisions including: (1) modifying the caregiver questions; (2) integrating social workers in the response; and (3) adding a text-based report to the care team.\n\n\nImplications for Practice\nThis formative research provided valuable feedback for portal development, and also contributes more broadly to recommendations related to integrating caregivers in healthcare.\n\n\nFoundational\nThis research provides practical and logistical relevance to the discussion on how to integrate caregivers into clinical care.","PeriodicalId":72506,"journal":{"name":"Cancer care research online","volume":"1 4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer care research online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/cr9.0000000000000014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Background
Despite recommendations and policies to integrate family caregivers into U.S. healthcare settings, caregivers are not systematically involved. Thus, we developed an Integrated Caregiver Patient-Portal system that (1) allows a patient to identify their primary caregiver and their communication preferences; (2) connects the caregiver to a unique portal page to indicate their needs; and 3) informs the care team of dyad responses to aid in integrating the caregiver.
Objective
This formative research explored palliative care clinicians' perceptions of the system to inform refinements before usability testing.
Methods
We conducted two focus groups with palliative care clinicians (N=11) at an NCI-designated cancer center. Transcripts were analyzed using an integrated approach to specify system benefits and concerns.
Results
The most referenced benefits included: Learning information that they might not have known without the system; giving caregivers a voice or a way to express needs; and supporting an ideal model of care. Top concerns included lacking capacity to respond; needing to clarify clinician roles and expertise in responding to caregivers' needs; and ensuring ongoing system adaptability.
Conclusions
The clinicians' feedback resulted in revisions including: (1) modifying the caregiver questions; (2) integrating social workers in the response; and (3) adding a text-based report to the care team.
Implications for Practice
This formative research provided valuable feedback for portal development, and also contributes more broadly to recommendations related to integrating caregivers in healthcare.
Foundational
This research provides practical and logistical relevance to the discussion on how to integrate caregivers into clinical care.