Significance of Semantic Web – Pitfalls and Benefits of Use in the Common Judiciary

Q2 Arts and Humanities Comparative Legilinguistics Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI:10.14746/cl.2019.40.2
Monika Odlanicka-Poczobutt
{"title":"Significance of Semantic Web – Pitfalls and Benefits of Use in the Common Judiciary","authors":"Monika Odlanicka-Poczobutt","doi":"10.14746/cl.2019.40.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Semantic Webs increasingly allow the processing of information over the Internet according to their content and purpose. The widespread use of metadata standards has, however, caused interoperability problems between different systems. Enabling users to search for different languages requires translation resources to cross the language barrier can be a serious challenge. The presented tendency to use semantic webs is an opportunity for legislation, facilitating the process of developing and providing legal regulations and managing the progress of legislative work and implementation of procedures. The aim of this article is to review semantic web theory in relation to the pitfalls of defining and applying ontology to the machine-based understanding of content stored in the network. The scope of this article is a preliminary analysis of aspects of interdisciplinary cooperation in the metadata creation phase – indexed according to the conceptual analysis (ontology) of a given field. The area of research interest was also the benefits and pitfalls of using open source, XML and the Legal Semantic Web in the common judiciary.","PeriodicalId":32698,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Legilinguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Legilinguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/cl.2019.40.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Semantic Webs increasingly allow the processing of information over the Internet according to their content and purpose. The widespread use of metadata standards has, however, caused interoperability problems between different systems. Enabling users to search for different languages requires translation resources to cross the language barrier can be a serious challenge. The presented tendency to use semantic webs is an opportunity for legislation, facilitating the process of developing and providing legal regulations and managing the progress of legislative work and implementation of procedures. The aim of this article is to review semantic web theory in relation to the pitfalls of defining and applying ontology to the machine-based understanding of content stored in the network. The scope of this article is a preliminary analysis of aspects of interdisciplinary cooperation in the metadata creation phase – indexed according to the conceptual analysis (ontology) of a given field. The area of research interest was also the benefits and pitfalls of using open source, XML and the Legal Semantic Web in the common judiciary.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
语义网的意义——在普通司法中使用的陷阱和好处
抽象语义网越来越多地允许根据其内容和目的在互联网上处理信息。然而,元数据标准的广泛使用导致了不同系统之间的互操作性问题。让用户搜索不同的语言需要翻译资源来跨越语言障碍,这可能是一个严峻的挑战。目前使用语义网的趋势为立法提供了机会,促进了制定和提供法律法规的进程,并管理了立法工作和程序执行的进展。本文的目的是回顾语义网理论与定义本体并将其应用于基于机器的网络存储内容理解的陷阱有关。本文的范围是对元数据创建阶段跨学科合作的各个方面的初步分析——根据给定领域的概念分析(本体论)进行索引。研究兴趣的领域还包括在普通司法中使用开源、XML和法律语义网的好处和陷阱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Comparative Legilinguistics
Comparative Legilinguistics Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Simultaneous interpretation in interpreter-mediated remote legal proceedings: some observations from a forum theatre study De la protection de l’environnement dans les Constitutions Algeriennes On the challenges of legal translation Problems in English-Chinese and Chinese-English legal translation: with a case study of mistranslations Preface to the Special Issue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1