Gaps in the implementation of national core elements for sustainable antimicrobial use in the WHO-African region

Walter L. Fuller, A. Aboderin, Ali A. Yahaya, A. Adeyemo, L. Gahimbare, O. Kapona, Omotayo T. Hamzat, O. Bassoum
{"title":"Gaps in the implementation of national core elements for sustainable antimicrobial use in the WHO-African region","authors":"Walter L. Fuller, A. Aboderin, Ali A. Yahaya, A. Adeyemo, L. Gahimbare, O. Kapona, Omotayo T. Hamzat, O. Bassoum","doi":"10.3389/frabi.2022.1047565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has emerged as a leading global health and economic threat of the 21st century, with Africa bearing the greatest burden of mortality from drug-resistant infections. Optimization of the use of antimicrobials is a core strategic element of the response to AMR, addressing misuse and overuse as primary drivers. Effectively, this requires the whole society comprising not only healthcare professionals but also the public, as well as the government, to engage in a bottom-up and a top-down approach. We determined the progress of African national governments in optimizing antimicrobial drug use. Methods From September 2021 to June 2022, all 47 member states of the World Health Organization African region (WHO AFRO) were invited to participate in a survey determining the implementation of strategies to optimize antimicrobial use (AMU). We used the WHO antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) assessment tool, National core elements—A checklist to guide the country in identifying existing national core elements for the implementation of AMS Programs, to obtain information from national AMR focal persons. The tool consists of four sections—national plans and strategies; regulations and guidelines; awareness, training, and education; and supporting technologies and data—with a total of 33 checklist items, each graded from 0 to 4. The responses were aggregated and analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2020®. Results Thirty-one (66%) of the 47 countries returned completed forms. Only eight (25.8%) countries have developed a national AMS implementation policy incorporating defined goals, targets, and operational plans. There are no budget lines for AMS activities in 23 (74.2%) countries. The WHO Access, Watch, Reserve (AWaRe) classification of optimizing AMU has been integrated into the national essential medicines list or formulary in 19 (61.3%) countries, while the incorporation of the AMS principles and WHO AWaRe classification into national clinical guidelines for the management of infections is present in only 12 (38.7%) and 11 (34.5%) countries, respectively. Although regulations on the prescription-only sale/dispensing of antibiotics are present in 68% of countries, their enforcement is poor. Systems identifying pathogens and antibiotic susceptibility for optimal use of antibiotics are lacking in 38% of countries. Conclusion In Africa, wide gaps exist in the governments’ implementation of the core elements of optimizing antimicrobial drug use. Responding to AMR constitutes a long journey, and technical and financial support needs to be deployed to optimize the use of antimicrobials.","PeriodicalId":73065,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in antibiotics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in antibiotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frabi.2022.1047565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has emerged as a leading global health and economic threat of the 21st century, with Africa bearing the greatest burden of mortality from drug-resistant infections. Optimization of the use of antimicrobials is a core strategic element of the response to AMR, addressing misuse and overuse as primary drivers. Effectively, this requires the whole society comprising not only healthcare professionals but also the public, as well as the government, to engage in a bottom-up and a top-down approach. We determined the progress of African national governments in optimizing antimicrobial drug use. Methods From September 2021 to June 2022, all 47 member states of the World Health Organization African region (WHO AFRO) were invited to participate in a survey determining the implementation of strategies to optimize antimicrobial use (AMU). We used the WHO antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) assessment tool, National core elements—A checklist to guide the country in identifying existing national core elements for the implementation of AMS Programs, to obtain information from national AMR focal persons. The tool consists of four sections—national plans and strategies; regulations and guidelines; awareness, training, and education; and supporting technologies and data—with a total of 33 checklist items, each graded from 0 to 4. The responses were aggregated and analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2020®. Results Thirty-one (66%) of the 47 countries returned completed forms. Only eight (25.8%) countries have developed a national AMS implementation policy incorporating defined goals, targets, and operational plans. There are no budget lines for AMS activities in 23 (74.2%) countries. The WHO Access, Watch, Reserve (AWaRe) classification of optimizing AMU has been integrated into the national essential medicines list or formulary in 19 (61.3%) countries, while the incorporation of the AMS principles and WHO AWaRe classification into national clinical guidelines for the management of infections is present in only 12 (38.7%) and 11 (34.5%) countries, respectively. Although regulations on the prescription-only sale/dispensing of antibiotics are present in 68% of countries, their enforcement is poor. Systems identifying pathogens and antibiotic susceptibility for optimal use of antibiotics are lacking in 38% of countries. Conclusion In Africa, wide gaps exist in the governments’ implementation of the core elements of optimizing antimicrobial drug use. Responding to AMR constitutes a long journey, and technical and financial support needs to be deployed to optimize the use of antimicrobials.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
世界卫生组织-非洲区域实施可持续抗菌药物使用国家核心要素方面的差距
背景抗微生物耐药性(AMR)已成为21世纪全球健康和经济的主要威胁,非洲承受着耐药性感染造成的最大死亡负担。优化抗菌药物的使用是应对AMR的核心战略要素,将滥用和过度使用作为主要驱动因素。实际上,这需要整个社会,不仅包括医疗专业人员,还包括公众和政府,采取自下而上和自上而下的方法。我们确定了非洲国家政府在优化抗菌药物使用方面的进展。方法从2021年9月至2022年6月,邀请世界卫生组织非洲区域(世界卫生组织非洲区域)所有47个成员国参加一项调查,以确定优化抗菌药物使用战略(AMU)的实施情况。我们使用世界卫生组织抗菌药物管理(AMS)评估工具“国家核心要素——一份清单”来指导该国确定现有的国家核心要素,以实施AMS计划,并从国家抗菌药物管理协调人处获取信息。该工具包括四个部分——国家计划和战略;条例和准则;意识、培训和教育;以及支持技术和数据——共有33个检查表项目,每个项目的评分从0到4。使用Microsoft Excel 2020®对回复进行汇总和分析。结果47个国家中有31个(66%)的国家返回了已填写的表格。只有八个(25.8%)国家制定了国家AMS实施政策,其中包括明确的目标、指标和运营计划。23个国家(74.2%)没有AMS活动的预算项目。优化AMU的世界卫生组织获取、观察、储备(AWaRe)分类已在19个国家(61.3%)纳入国家基本药物清单或处方,而将AMS原则和世界卫生组织AWaRe分类纳入国家感染管理临床指南的国家分别只有12个国家(38.7%)和11个国家(34.5%)。尽管68%的国家都有关于仅凭处方销售/配药抗生素的规定,但执行不力。38%的国家缺乏确定病原体和抗生素易感性以优化抗生素使用的系统。结论在非洲,各国政府在落实优化抗菌药物使用的核心要素方面存在很大差距。应对AMR是一段漫长的旅程,需要部署技术和财政支持来优化抗菌药物的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility of clinical isolates from adult and paediatric patients in Jordan: Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) 2010–2021 Editorial: Antibiotics in engineered and natural environments: occurrence, fate, kinetic and microbial impact Increased usage of doxycycline for young children with Lyme disease Unguarded liabilities: Borrelia burgdorferi’s complex amino acid dependence exposes unique avenues of inhibition Antibiogram profiles of pathogenic and commensal bacteria in goat and sheep feces on smallholder farm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1