Gereon Müller (2020). Inflectional morphology in harmonic serialism. (Advances in Optimality Theory.) Sheffield & Bristol, CT: Equinox Publishing. Pp. x + 350.

IF 0.7 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Phonology Pub Date : 2021-08-01 DOI:10.1017/S0952675721000221
Itamar Kastner
{"title":"Gereon Müller (2020). Inflectional morphology in harmonic serialism. (Advances in Optimality Theory.) Sheffield & Bristol, CT: Equinox Publishing. Pp. x + 350.","authors":"Itamar Kastner","doi":"10.1017/S0952675721000221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Inflectional morphology in harmonic serialism (IMHS), Gereon Müller provides proof of concept for a new theory of the morphology–phonology interface. IMHS proposes a lexicalist (presyntactic), realisational theory of morphology, built around the tenets of Harmonic Serialism (McCarthy 2008): the derivation begins with the root and proceeds through the affixes, whereby the optimal exponent is selected at each step. The monograph goes through a range of data in different languages, developing and refining the theory in order to account for increasingly complex empirical scenarios. The book holds together well. IMHS is a young theory, still finding its bearings in a world full of counterbleeding, multiple exponence and root suppletion. It would be harsh to expect it to provide thorough accounts of many different phenomena. The monograph takes the challenge head on, though, applying the serialist framework to case after case. What we get as a result is the first systematic overview of the theory, delivering more than it originally promised. This achievement makes it possible to dig into the architecture of IMHS, comparing it with other approaches in a way that a theory this novel would not usually facilitate. I devote the first half of this review to outlining IMHS itself (§2), before considering it on its own terms (§3) and highlighting points of contrast with other approaches (§4).","PeriodicalId":46804,"journal":{"name":"Phonology","volume":"38 1","pages":"513 - 520"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phonology","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675721000221","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Inflectional morphology in harmonic serialism (IMHS), Gereon Müller provides proof of concept for a new theory of the morphology–phonology interface. IMHS proposes a lexicalist (presyntactic), realisational theory of morphology, built around the tenets of Harmonic Serialism (McCarthy 2008): the derivation begins with the root and proceeds through the affixes, whereby the optimal exponent is selected at each step. The monograph goes through a range of data in different languages, developing and refining the theory in order to account for increasingly complex empirical scenarios. The book holds together well. IMHS is a young theory, still finding its bearings in a world full of counterbleeding, multiple exponence and root suppletion. It would be harsh to expect it to provide thorough accounts of many different phenomena. The monograph takes the challenge head on, though, applying the serialist framework to case after case. What we get as a result is the first systematic overview of the theory, delivering more than it originally promised. This achievement makes it possible to dig into the architecture of IMHS, comparing it with other approaches in a way that a theory this novel would not usually facilitate. I devote the first half of this review to outlining IMHS itself (§2), before considering it on its own terms (§3) and highlighting points of contrast with other approaches (§4).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gereon Müller(2020)。调和级数论中的变形形态。(《最优化理论进展》,谢菲尔德和布里斯托尔,CT:春分出版社。第x+350页。
Gereon Müller在《调和序列论中的变形形态学》(IMHS)中为一种新的形态学-音韵学界面理论提供了概念证明。IMHS提出了一种词汇主义(前句法),即形态的实现理论,该理论建立在调和系列主义(McCarthy 2008)的原则之上:推导从词根开始,通过词缀进行,从而在每一步都选择最佳指数。该专著以不同的语言研究了一系列数据,发展和完善了理论,以解释日益复杂的经验场景。这本书写得很好。IMHS是一个年轻的理论,它仍然在一个充满制衡、多重解释和根源补充的世界中找到了方向。如果期望它对许多不同的现象提供全面的描述,那就太苛刻了。然而,这本专著直面了挑战,将连载主义框架应用于一个又一个案例。因此,我们得到的是对该理论的第一次系统概述,提供了比最初承诺的更多的内容。这一成就使我们有可能深入研究IMHS的体系结构,并将其与其他方法进行比较,而这是这部小说通常不会促进的理论。我在本次审查的前半部分专门概述了IMHS本身(§2),然后根据其自身的条件进行考虑(§3),并强调了与其他方法的对比点(§4)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Phonology
Phonology Multiple-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: Phonology, published three times a year, is the only journal devoted exclusively to the discipline, and provides a unique forum for the productive interchange of ideas among phonologists and those working in related disciplines. Preference is given to papers which make a substantial theoretical contribution, irrespective of the particular theoretical framework employed, but the submission of papers presenting new empirical data of general theoretical interest is also encouraged. The journal carries research articles, as well as book reviews and shorter pieces on topics of current controversy within phonology.
期刊最新文献
Korean vowel harmony has weak phonotactic support and has limited productivity A unified model of lenition as modulation reduction: gauging consonant strength in Ibibio Learning biases in proper nouns Implicit and explicit processes in phonological concept learning The stratal structure of Kuria morphological tone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1