Evaluation of e-Government Service Quality Using e-GovQual Dimensions Case Study Regional Office Ministry of Law and Human Rights DIY

Taufiq Effendy Wijatmoko, M. U. Siregar
{"title":"Evaluation of e-Government Service Quality Using e-GovQual Dimensions Case Study Regional Office Ministry of Law and Human Rights DIY","authors":"Taufiq Effendy Wijatmoko, M. U. Siregar","doi":"10.14421/ijid.2019.08202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Regional Office of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights DIY organizes a variety of public services using information technology, including correctional services, immigration services, general legal administration services, intellectual property services, communication services, data and information services, and other administrative services. None of these services can be separated from the role of information technology to provide services that are fast, cheap, effective and reliable to the public. This study was conducted to assess the quality Ministry of Law and Human Rights DIY e-Government service using e-GovQual dimensional framework as a best practice. This study includes quantitative research involving a number of respondents for the survey. Research questions are based on the dimensions of e-Govqual and represent the attributes of each dimension of e-GovQual to assess the quality of Ministry of Law and Human Rights DIY e-Government service. The question must pass the validation test using Cronbach’s α. The processing of data using confirmatory factor analysis to obtain the main factors that affect each of the dimensions of e-GovQual. The Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) method helps e-GovQual to measure the level of importance and level of performance of each e-GovQual attribute by classifying it in the Cartesian quadrants, which can help ensure the quality of e-Government services according to the needs and expectations of citizens as service user. Values in IPA (concentrating here, keeping up the good work, low priority, and possible overkill) will be the value of quality e-Government services. The results of this study are expected to give priority as a recommendation for Information and Communication Technology to the development of e-Government services in order to improve service quality. ","PeriodicalId":33558,"journal":{"name":"IJID International Journal on Informatics for Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJID International Journal on Informatics for Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14421/ijid.2019.08202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Regional Office of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights DIY organizes a variety of public services using information technology, including correctional services, immigration services, general legal administration services, intellectual property services, communication services, data and information services, and other administrative services. None of these services can be separated from the role of information technology to provide services that are fast, cheap, effective and reliable to the public. This study was conducted to assess the quality Ministry of Law and Human Rights DIY e-Government service using e-GovQual dimensional framework as a best practice. This study includes quantitative research involving a number of respondents for the survey. Research questions are based on the dimensions of e-Govqual and represent the attributes of each dimension of e-GovQual to assess the quality of Ministry of Law and Human Rights DIY e-Government service. The question must pass the validation test using Cronbach’s α. The processing of data using confirmatory factor analysis to obtain the main factors that affect each of the dimensions of e-GovQual. The Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) method helps e-GovQual to measure the level of importance and level of performance of each e-GovQual attribute by classifying it in the Cartesian quadrants, which can help ensure the quality of e-Government services according to the needs and expectations of citizens as service user. Values in IPA (concentrating here, keeping up the good work, low priority, and possible overkill) will be the value of quality e-Government services. The results of this study are expected to give priority as a recommendation for Information and Communication Technology to the development of e-Government services in order to improve service quality. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用电子政务质量维度评估电子政务服务质量——法律和人权部地区办事处案例研究
法律和人权部区域办事处利用信息技术组织各种公共服务,包括惩教服务、移民服务、一般法律行政服务、知识产权服务、通信服务、数据和信息服务以及其他行政服务。这些服务都离不开信息技术的作用,为公众提供快速、廉价、有效和可靠的服务。本研究旨在评估法律和人权部DIY电子政务服务的质量,将电子政务Qual维度框架作为最佳实践。这项研究包括一些调查对象参与的定量研究。研究问题基于e-Govqual的维度,代表e-Govqual每个维度的属性,以评估法律和人权部DIY电子政府服务的质量。问题必须通过使用Cronbachα的验证测试。使用验证性因素分析对数据进行处理,以获得影响电子政务质量各维度的主要因素。重要性-绩效分析(IPA)方法通过将每个电子政务属性分类在笛卡尔象限中,帮助电子政务Qual衡量其重要性水平和绩效水平,这有助于根据公民作为服务用户的需求和期望来确保电子政务服务的质量。IPA的价值观(集中在这里,保持良好的工作,低优先级,以及可能的过度使用)将是高质量电子政府服务的价值。这项研究的结果预计将优先作为信息和通信技术的建议,发展电子政务服务,以提高服务质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Forecasting: Analyze Online and Offline Learning Mode with Machine Learning Algorithms Real-time Smartphone Usage Surveillance System Based on YOLOv5 Classifying High School Scholarship Recipients Using the K-Nearest Neighbor Algorithm Data Search Process Optimization using Brute Force and Genetic Algorithm Hybrid Method Quran Memorization Technologies and Methods: Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1