“Africa's First Woman Press Photographer”: Mabel Cetu's Photographs in Zonk!

IF 0.3 3区 艺术学 0 ART AFRICAN ARTS Pub Date : 2022-08-27 DOI:10.1162/afar_a_00669
Marie Meyerding
{"title":"“Africa's First Woman Press Photographer”: Mabel Cetu's Photographs in Zonk!","authors":"Marie Meyerding","doi":"10.1162/afar_a_00669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"| african arts AUTUMN 2022 VOL. 55, NO. 3 For years, researchers have been searching for photographs made by Mabel Cetu, who “was said to be the first Black South African woman photojournalist” (Siopis 2006: 10). Cetu was a Black woman who worked as a nurse for more than twenty-five years before she was trained as a photographer in 1956, eight years after the National Party took over South Africa’s government and introduced apartheid—a system of institutionalized racial discrimination against people of color. She received her training at the monthly publication Zonk! African People’s Pictorial, which was launched in 1949 as the country’s first widely circulated magazine directed at a Black readership (Maingard 2020: 153). Perhaps because many magazines published their images uncredited at the time, it seems as if none of her images have been found, meaning that they have never been discussed in scholarly research.1 Critically examining Cetu’s photographs printed in Zonk! in 1956 and 1957 and analyzing in how far she might have been able to subvert common representations of gender, I want to reveal gendered power structures determining the field of photography in 1950s South Africa. The search for Cetu’s photographs can be understood as part of recent scholarly interest in female South African photographers working prior to 1994 (Newbury, Rizzo, and Thomas 2021; du Toit 2005; Corrigall 2018; Danilowitz 2005; Thomas 2018). It is interesting that, although most of these photographers, including Cetu, would probably not have considered their photographs as art, nearly all researchers concentrating on their works are art historians. While photographs had been displayed in a fine art context in South Africa from 1858 (Bull and Denfield 1970: 63), the 1950s photographs of Cetu and her contemporaries were only rediscovered in the late 1980s, when they started to circulate “as aestheticised images ... [ascending from the] grainy pictures in magazines” (du Toit and Gordon 2016: 158). The recent interest in these women’s photography can also be related to the efforts made in the field of humanities to broaden the canon and include more works by those groups that have historically been marginalized. For instance, the former director of the South African National Gallery, Marilyn Martin, claims that in South Africa’s history of photography, Black women form “the most telling absences” (2001: 51). During the 1950s, when Cetu began working as a photographer, the field of photography in South Africa was largely dominated by men and White people. The artist Penny Siopis takes the example of the photographs of the notorious 1956 Women’s March to point to the absence of women photographers covering the event (2006: 10). She claims that “Black women did not see photography as a viable profession. Those few chances to build a photographic career seemed limited to men, as witnessed in the photojournalism of Drum magazine of the fifties” (2006: 10). The lack of representation of Black women in the history of photography in South Africa is closely related to their nonexistence in or unavailability through archives. Pam Warne, the former curator of photography and new media at Iziko Museums, explains that “the paucity of research on both Black and White South African women photographers suggests that the lives of many female professionals and amateurs have thus far remained unrecorded, their work hidden in archives and lost” (2006: 15). This is also the case for Zonk!, which has very limited accessibility. Maingard highlights that, while both the British Library and the National Library of South Africa hold hard copies of the magazine, only the former makes the publication available on microfilm (2020: 156). She further argues that no resources for digitizing such publications exist in South Africa, noting that “large-scale digitization projects have tended to favour only certain parts of the world and privilege mainstream resources, particularly those located in or pertaining to the ‘global north’” (2020: 156). Warne points to the fact that “Mabel Cetu may not have been the only Black woman photographer working during the 1950s in an apparently exclusively male “Africa’s First Woman Press Photographer” Mabel Cetu’s Photographs in Zonk!","PeriodicalId":45314,"journal":{"name":"AFRICAN ARTS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AFRICAN ARTS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/afar_a_00669","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

| african arts AUTUMN 2022 VOL. 55, NO. 3 For years, researchers have been searching for photographs made by Mabel Cetu, who “was said to be the first Black South African woman photojournalist” (Siopis 2006: 10). Cetu was a Black woman who worked as a nurse for more than twenty-five years before she was trained as a photographer in 1956, eight years after the National Party took over South Africa’s government and introduced apartheid—a system of institutionalized racial discrimination against people of color. She received her training at the monthly publication Zonk! African People’s Pictorial, which was launched in 1949 as the country’s first widely circulated magazine directed at a Black readership (Maingard 2020: 153). Perhaps because many magazines published their images uncredited at the time, it seems as if none of her images have been found, meaning that they have never been discussed in scholarly research.1 Critically examining Cetu’s photographs printed in Zonk! in 1956 and 1957 and analyzing in how far she might have been able to subvert common representations of gender, I want to reveal gendered power structures determining the field of photography in 1950s South Africa. The search for Cetu’s photographs can be understood as part of recent scholarly interest in female South African photographers working prior to 1994 (Newbury, Rizzo, and Thomas 2021; du Toit 2005; Corrigall 2018; Danilowitz 2005; Thomas 2018). It is interesting that, although most of these photographers, including Cetu, would probably not have considered their photographs as art, nearly all researchers concentrating on their works are art historians. While photographs had been displayed in a fine art context in South Africa from 1858 (Bull and Denfield 1970: 63), the 1950s photographs of Cetu and her contemporaries were only rediscovered in the late 1980s, when they started to circulate “as aestheticised images ... [ascending from the] grainy pictures in magazines” (du Toit and Gordon 2016: 158). The recent interest in these women’s photography can also be related to the efforts made in the field of humanities to broaden the canon and include more works by those groups that have historically been marginalized. For instance, the former director of the South African National Gallery, Marilyn Martin, claims that in South Africa’s history of photography, Black women form “the most telling absences” (2001: 51). During the 1950s, when Cetu began working as a photographer, the field of photography in South Africa was largely dominated by men and White people. The artist Penny Siopis takes the example of the photographs of the notorious 1956 Women’s March to point to the absence of women photographers covering the event (2006: 10). She claims that “Black women did not see photography as a viable profession. Those few chances to build a photographic career seemed limited to men, as witnessed in the photojournalism of Drum magazine of the fifties” (2006: 10). The lack of representation of Black women in the history of photography in South Africa is closely related to their nonexistence in or unavailability through archives. Pam Warne, the former curator of photography and new media at Iziko Museums, explains that “the paucity of research on both Black and White South African women photographers suggests that the lives of many female professionals and amateurs have thus far remained unrecorded, their work hidden in archives and lost” (2006: 15). This is also the case for Zonk!, which has very limited accessibility. Maingard highlights that, while both the British Library and the National Library of South Africa hold hard copies of the magazine, only the former makes the publication available on microfilm (2020: 156). She further argues that no resources for digitizing such publications exist in South Africa, noting that “large-scale digitization projects have tended to favour only certain parts of the world and privilege mainstream resources, particularly those located in or pertaining to the ‘global north’” (2020: 156). Warne points to the fact that “Mabel Cetu may not have been the only Black woman photographer working during the 1950s in an apparently exclusively male “Africa’s First Woman Press Photographer” Mabel Cetu’s Photographs in Zonk!
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“非洲第一位女性新闻摄影师”:Mabel Cetu在Zonk的照片!
|《非洲艺术秋季2022》第55卷第3期多年来,研究人员一直在寻找Mabel Cetu拍摄的照片,她“据说是第一位南非黑人女摄影记者”(Siopis 2006:10)。Cetu是一名黑人女性,在1956年接受摄影师培训之前,她做了25年多的护士。8年前,国家党接管了南非政府,引入了种族隔离制度——一种针对有色人种的制度化种族歧视制度。她在月刊《Zonk!《非洲人民画报》于1949年创刊,是该国第一本面向黑人读者的广为流传的杂志(Maingard 2020:153)。也许是因为当时许多杂志都发表了未经编辑的照片,似乎没有发现她的照片,这意味着学术研究中从未讨论过这些照片!在1956年和1957年,我分析了她可能在多大程度上颠覆了性别的共同表征,我想揭示决定20世纪50年代南非摄影领域的性别权力结构。对Cetu照片的搜索可以被理解为最近学术界对1994年之前工作的南非女性摄影师的兴趣的一部分(Newbury,Rizzo,and Thomas 2021;杜托伊特2005;科里格尔2018;达尼洛维茨2005;托马斯2018)。有趣的是,尽管包括Cetu在内的大多数摄影师可能不会将他们的照片视为艺术,但几乎所有专注于他们作品的研究人员都是艺术历史学家。虽然1858年以来,照片一直在南非的美术背景下展出(Bull和Denfield 1970:63),但20世纪50年代Cetu和她的同时代人的照片直到20世纪80年代末才被重新发现,当时它们开始“作为审美化的图像……从杂志上的粒状图片中上升”(du Toit和Gordon 2016:158)。最近对这些女性摄影的兴趣也可能与人文领域所做的努力有关,这些努力旨在扩大经典,并包括更多历史上被边缘化的群体的作品。例如,南非国家美术馆前馆长玛丽莲·马丁声称,在南非摄影史上,黑人女性构成了“最明显的缺席”(2001:51)。20世纪50年代,当Cetu开始从事摄影师工作时,南非的摄影领域主要由男性和白人主导。艺术家Penny Siopis以臭名昭著的1956年妇女大游行的照片为例,指出没有女性摄影师报道这一活动(2006:10)。她声称,“黑人女性并不认为摄影是一种可行的职业。那些为数不多的建立摄影生涯的机会似乎仅限于男性,正如50年代《Drum》杂志的摄影新闻学所见证的那样”(2006:10)。在南非摄影史上,黑人女性缺乏代表性,这与她们不存在于档案中或无法通过档案获得密切相关。伊兹科博物馆的前摄影和新媒体策展人帕姆·沃恩解释说,“对南非黑人和白人女摄影师的研究很少,这表明许多女性专业人士和业余爱好者的生活迄今为止仍未被记录,她们的作品被藏在档案中并丢失了”(2006:15)。Zonk也是如此!,其具有非常有限的可访问性。Maingard强调,虽然大英图书馆和南非国家图书馆都持有该杂志的硬拷贝,但只有前者以缩微胶片形式提供该出版物(2020:156)。她进一步辩称,南非没有用于数字化此类出版物的资源,并指出“大规模数字化项目往往只青睐世界的某些地区,并优先考虑主流资源,特别是那些位于‘全球北方’或与‘全球北方'有关的资源”(2020:156)。Warne指出,“Mabel Cetu可能不是20世纪50年代唯一一位在Zonk拍摄“非洲第一位女性新闻摄影师”Mabel Cetu's Photographs的黑人女性摄影师!
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: African Arts is devoted to the study and discussion of traditional, contemporary, and popular African arts and expressive cultures. Since 1967, African Arts readers have enjoyed high-quality visual depictions, cutting-edge explorations of theory and practice, and critical dialogue. Each issue features a core of peer-reviewed scholarly articles concerning the world"s second largest continent and its diasporas, and provides a host of resources - book and museum exhibition reviews, exhibition previews, features on collections, artist portfolios, dialogue and editorial columns. The journal promotes investigation of the connections between the arts and anthropology, history, language, literature, politics, religion, and sociology.
期刊最新文献
Sane Wadu: I Hope So curated by Mukami Kuria and Angela Muritu Textiles in the History of the History of African Art African Textiles, Fashionable Textiles: An Introduction African Textiles, Fashionable Textiles: A Historiography Kanga Cloths at Vlisco: An Object-Based Study of Dutch Printing for the Colonial East African Market, 1876–1971
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1