Pathways to Parenthood among LGBTIQ People in Croatia: Who Wants to Become a Parent and How?

Q3 Social Sciences Revija za Sociologiju Pub Date : 2019-08-31 DOI:10.5613/rzs.49.2.3
M. Štambuk, M. Vujčić, M. Milković, Anton Maričić
{"title":"Pathways to Parenthood among LGBTIQ People in Croatia: Who Wants to Become a Parent and How?","authors":"M. Štambuk, M. Vujčić, M. Milković, Anton Maričić","doi":"10.5613/rzs.49.2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex and queer (LGBTIQ) people can become parents using various methods, but actual possibilities differ between countries depending on the legislation and social norms. The main goal of this study was to explore parenting desire and family formation methods among LGBTIQ people in Croatia. Differences in parenting desire based on sociodemographic characteristics, the frequency and use of family formation methods, as well as the importance of different sources of support for parenthood were analysed. 486 childless LGBTIQ people (aged 18 to 54) and 24 LGBTIQ people who were parents (aged 24 to 54) participated in an online survey. Childless participants who did not want children were on average older in comparison to those who wanted to have children. There were no significant differences in desire for parenthood based on education, income and relationship status, as well as between cis-females and cis-males and lesbians and gays. Most of the participants who were already parents had a child in a previous heterosexual relationship, while most of those who tried to become parents used an assisted reproductive technology. Among all the participants, the most preferred family formation methods were adoption and foster care, and partners were considered as the most important source of support for parenthood. Childless participants who wanted to have children perceived significantly more support from family, friends, and a significant other in comparison to those who did not want children. These results provide novel insights into the decision-making processes LGBTIQ people go through before family formation and indicate associations between the life context (e.g. age, social support) and parenting desire.","PeriodicalId":39535,"journal":{"name":"Revija za Sociologiju","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5613/rzs.49.2.3","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revija za Sociologiju","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5613/rzs.49.2.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex and queer (LGBTIQ) people can become parents using various methods, but actual possibilities differ between countries depending on the legislation and social norms. The main goal of this study was to explore parenting desire and family formation methods among LGBTIQ people in Croatia. Differences in parenting desire based on sociodemographic characteristics, the frequency and use of family formation methods, as well as the importance of different sources of support for parenthood were analysed. 486 childless LGBTIQ people (aged 18 to 54) and 24 LGBTIQ people who were parents (aged 24 to 54) participated in an online survey. Childless participants who did not want children were on average older in comparison to those who wanted to have children. There were no significant differences in desire for parenthood based on education, income and relationship status, as well as between cis-females and cis-males and lesbians and gays. Most of the participants who were already parents had a child in a previous heterosexual relationship, while most of those who tried to become parents used an assisted reproductive technology. Among all the participants, the most preferred family formation methods were adoption and foster care, and partners were considered as the most important source of support for parenthood. Childless participants who wanted to have children perceived significantly more support from family, friends, and a significant other in comparison to those who did not want children. These results provide novel insights into the decision-making processes LGBTIQ people go through before family formation and indicate associations between the life context (e.g. age, social support) and parenting desire.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
克罗地亚LGBTIQ人群为人父母的途径:谁想成为父母?如何成为父母?
女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者、双性人和酷儿(LGBTIQ)可以使用各种方法成为父母,但各国的实际可能性因立法和社会规范而异。本研究的主要目的是探索克罗地亚LGBTIQ人群的育儿愿望和家庭组建方法。分析了基于社会人口特征、家庭组建方法的频率和使用以及不同父母支持来源的重要性的育儿意愿差异。486名无子女的LGBTIQ人群(18岁至54岁)和24名有父母的LGBTIQs人群(24岁至54年龄)参加了一项在线调查。与想要孩子的参与者相比,不想要孩子的无子女参与者平均年龄更大。基于教育、收入和关系状况,以及顺式女性和顺式男性以及女同性恋和男同性恋之间,为人父母的愿望没有显著差异。大多数已经为人父母的参与者以前有过异性恋关系,而大多数试图成为父母的参与者使用了辅助生殖技术。在所有参与者中,最喜欢的家庭组建方法是收养和寄养,伴侣被认为是为人父母最重要的支持来源。与不想要孩子的参与者相比,想要孩子的无子女参与者感受到了来自家人、朋友和重要他人的更多支持。这些结果为LGBTIQ人群在组建家庭之前所经历的决策过程提供了新的见解,并表明了生活环境(如年龄、社会支持)与养育愿望之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revija za Sociologiju
Revija za Sociologiju Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ludwik Fleck Percepcija i iskustvo rodne diskriminacije studenata i studentica na Sveučilištu u Zagrebu Traženje povezanosti medijske pismenosti i političke participacije kod različitih generacija Gledaj (TV) i uči? Važnost (utjelovljenog) kulturnog kapitala u objašnjenju klasične i digitalne medijske pismenosti Biti medijski pismen u Hrvatskoj
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1