The AMLO Voter: Affective Polarization and the Rise of the Left in Mexico

IF 1.6 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Journal of Politics in Latin America Pub Date : 2022-12-27 DOI:10.1177/1866802X221147067
Rodrigo Castro Cornejo
{"title":"The AMLO Voter: Affective Polarization and the Rise of the Left in Mexico","authors":"Rodrigo Castro Cornejo","doi":"10.1177/1866802X221147067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What prompted so many voters in Mexico to abandon the traditional parties and support MORENA and its candidate, Andrés Manuel López Obrador? This research relies on data from Mexico's National Electoral Study (2018). The results show that support for López Obrador is strongly associated with affective polarization and the perception that the PRI and PAN represented the same political alternative. In turn, retrospective evaluations and ideology were not associated with López Obrador's victory. This research note contributes to our understanding of Mexico's historical elections as well as to the broader literature on the Latin American left. The success of the political left in Mexico is not rooted on voters’ programmatic preferences. Similar to the decay of mainstream political parties in other Latin American countries, in 2018, Mexican voters rejected the mainstream political establishment by supporting Lopez Obrador's third bid for the Presidency.","PeriodicalId":44885,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Politics in Latin America","volume":"15 1","pages":"96 - 112"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Politics in Latin America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1866802X221147067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

What prompted so many voters in Mexico to abandon the traditional parties and support MORENA and its candidate, Andrés Manuel López Obrador? This research relies on data from Mexico's National Electoral Study (2018). The results show that support for López Obrador is strongly associated with affective polarization and the perception that the PRI and PAN represented the same political alternative. In turn, retrospective evaluations and ideology were not associated with López Obrador's victory. This research note contributes to our understanding of Mexico's historical elections as well as to the broader literature on the Latin American left. The success of the political left in Mexico is not rooted on voters’ programmatic preferences. Similar to the decay of mainstream political parties in other Latin American countries, in 2018, Mexican voters rejected the mainstream political establishment by supporting Lopez Obrador's third bid for the Presidency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
AMLO选民:情感两极分化与墨西哥左翼的崛起
是什么促使墨西哥如此多的选民放弃传统政党,支持莫雷纳及其候选人安德烈斯·曼努埃尔·洛佩斯·奥夫拉多尔?这项研究依赖于墨西哥国家选举研究(2018)的数据。结果表明,对洛佩斯·奥夫拉多尔的支持与情感两极分化以及PRI和PAN代表相同政治选择的看法密切相关。反过来,回顾性评价和意识形态与洛佩斯·奥夫拉多尔的胜利无关。这份研究报告有助于我们理解墨西哥的历史选举,也有助于了解更广泛的拉丁美洲左翼文献。墨西哥政治左派的成功并非源于选民的纲领偏好。与其他拉丁美洲国家主流政党的衰落类似,2018年,墨西哥选民支持洛佩斯·奥夫拉多尔第三次竞选总统,拒绝了主流政治体制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Presidential Debates and Electoral Preferences in Weakly Institutionalised Democracies: Evidence From 32 Latin American Elections Researching the Gap: Women in Latin American Political Science Citizens’ Stability of Electoral Preferences in Chile Since the Social Upheaval Assessing Congressional Institutionalization and Political Elites’ Renewal in Latin America Through Legislative Amateurism Lessons from a Late Adopter: Feminist Advocacy, Democratizing Reforms, and Gender Quotas in Chile
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1