Comparative toxicity of endosulfan and diazinon on the embryo-larval development of the South American toad, Rhinella arenarum

Q4 Business, Management and Accounting International Journal of Environment and Health Pub Date : 2017-08-31 DOI:10.1504/IJENVH.2017.10007149
Carolina M. Aronzon, G. Svartz, C. P. Coll
{"title":"Comparative toxicity of endosulfan and diazinon on the embryo-larval development of the South American toad, Rhinella arenarum","authors":"Carolina M. Aronzon, G. Svartz, C. P. Coll","doi":"10.1504/IJENVH.2017.10007149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The toxicities of endosulfan and diazinon were comparatively analysed on the early development of the South American toad, Rhinella arenarum. Pesticides varied greatly in their effects on survival, with concentration-, time- and stage-dependent sensitivity. Endosulfan was 227 times more toxic than diazinon. The larval period was the most sensitive for both pesticides (LC-504 h: 0.01 mg L-1 and 1.92 mg L-1 for endosulfan and diazinon, respectively). Endosulfan toxicity increased 587 and 60 times from acute to chronic exposure in treatments with embryos and larvae, respectively, while diazinon toxicity increased about four and five times, respectively. Both pesticides caused important neurotoxic effects expressed as behavioural disturbances. Risk evaluation assessed by hazard quotient (HQ) was over 1, the level of concern (LOC), for both pesticides at chronic exposure periods and even at acute endosulfan exposure. Results obtained in the present study highlight that these pesticides should be considered potential threats for this species.","PeriodicalId":14036,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environment and Health","volume":"8 1","pages":"225"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environment and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJENVH.2017.10007149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The toxicities of endosulfan and diazinon were comparatively analysed on the early development of the South American toad, Rhinella arenarum. Pesticides varied greatly in their effects on survival, with concentration-, time- and stage-dependent sensitivity. Endosulfan was 227 times more toxic than diazinon. The larval period was the most sensitive for both pesticides (LC-504 h: 0.01 mg L-1 and 1.92 mg L-1 for endosulfan and diazinon, respectively). Endosulfan toxicity increased 587 and 60 times from acute to chronic exposure in treatments with embryos and larvae, respectively, while diazinon toxicity increased about four and five times, respectively. Both pesticides caused important neurotoxic effects expressed as behavioural disturbances. Risk evaluation assessed by hazard quotient (HQ) was over 1, the level of concern (LOC), for both pesticides at chronic exposure periods and even at acute endosulfan exposure. Results obtained in the present study highlight that these pesticides should be considered potential threats for this species.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
硫丹和二嗪农对南美蟾蜍胚胎幼虫发育的比较毒性
比较分析了硫丹和二嗪农对南美蟾蜍(Rhinella arenarum)早期发育的毒性。农药对生存的影响差异很大,其敏感性取决于浓度、时间和阶段。硫丹的毒性是二嗪农的227倍。幼虫期对这两种农药最敏感(LC-504小时:硫丹和二嗪农分别为0.01 mg L-1和1.92 mg L-1)。在胚胎和幼虫的处理中,硫丹的毒性从急性到慢性分别增加了587倍和60倍,而二嗪酮的毒性分别增加了约4倍和5倍。这两种杀虫剂都会产生重要的神经毒性作用,表现为行为障碍。在长期暴露期,甚至在急性硫丹暴露期,通过危害商(HQ)评估的风险评估都超过了1,即关注水平(LOC)。本研究的结果强调,这些杀虫剂应被视为对该物种的潜在威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Environment and Health
International Journal of Environment and Health Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: The IJEnvH is a fully-refereed scientific journal that provides an international forum for the exchange of information and the advancement of knowledge in the multidisciplinary field of Environment and Health. The aim of the IJEnvH is to stimulate the discussion and communication among scientists, researchers and experts with different background and expertise, involved, at different levels, with the study of environment and health problems.
期刊最新文献
Heavy metal contents in the most productive Argentinean Humid Pampa soils Co2+ sorption capacity indicators of La Plata region's soils: insights and correlations with soil properties The impact of flavoured mineral water drinks and sugar substitutes available on the Polish market on exogenic erosion of teeth enamel - in vitro study: preliminary results Risk of high blood lead levels among informal sector automobile artisans: a case study of Nakuru town, Kenya Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in street dust of Marvdasht city, SW Iran: concentration, health risk assessment and source apportionment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1