{"title":"Contar con la imaginación","authors":"David E. Johnson","doi":"10.15446/IDEASYVALORES.V69N6SUPL.90092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolEl articulo muestra la relacion estructural entre el testimonio y el juicio estetico, y como la mentira estructural se implica irreductiblemente como la posibilidad de la verdad. Se explica la necesaria imposibilidad del testimonio como condicion de su posibilidad, argumento anticipado por J. L. Borges: “No hay una sola hermosa palabra, con la excepcion dudosa de testigo, que no sea una abstraccion”. La argumentacion se apoya en la teoria husserliana del syncategorema (palabras incompletas cuyo sen- tido depende del contexto) y en los deicticos (palabras esencialmente ocasionales); asimismo, se toma de I. Kant el papel de la imaginacion y los efectos del “como si”. EnglishThis essay demonstrates the structural relationship between testimony and aesthetic judgment. The implications of this discovery are several, the most important being the relationship between the lie and truth, implicating that lie indicates the irreducible possibility of truth. The essay explains the necessary impossibility of the testimony as a condition of its possibility, an argument anticipated in Jorge Luis Borges’ beau- tiful phrase, “There is not a single beautiful word, with the dubious exception of witness, that is not an abstraction”. The argument is based on Husserl’s theory of the syncategorem (“incomplete” words whose meaning depends on the context) and on deictic words (“essentially occasional” words); as well, it takes from Kant, the role of the imagination and the effects of the “as if”.","PeriodicalId":43349,"journal":{"name":"Ideas y Valores","volume":"69 1","pages":"49-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ideas y Valores","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15446/IDEASYVALORES.V69N6SUPL.90092","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
espanolEl articulo muestra la relacion estructural entre el testimonio y el juicio estetico, y como la mentira estructural se implica irreductiblemente como la posibilidad de la verdad. Se explica la necesaria imposibilidad del testimonio como condicion de su posibilidad, argumento anticipado por J. L. Borges: “No hay una sola hermosa palabra, con la excepcion dudosa de testigo, que no sea una abstraccion”. La argumentacion se apoya en la teoria husserliana del syncategorema (palabras incompletas cuyo sen- tido depende del contexto) y en los deicticos (palabras esencialmente ocasionales); asimismo, se toma de I. Kant el papel de la imaginacion y los efectos del “como si”. EnglishThis essay demonstrates the structural relationship between testimony and aesthetic judgment. The implications of this discovery are several, the most important being the relationship between the lie and truth, implicating that lie indicates the irreducible possibility of truth. The essay explains the necessary impossibility of the testimony as a condition of its possibility, an argument anticipated in Jorge Luis Borges’ beau- tiful phrase, “There is not a single beautiful word, with the dubious exception of witness, that is not an abstraction”. The argument is based on Husserl’s theory of the syncategorem (“incomplete” words whose meaning depends on the context) and on deictic words (“essentially occasional” words); as well, it takes from Kant, the role of the imagination and the effects of the “as if”.
这篇西班牙语文章展示了证词和审美判断之间的结构性关系,以及结构性谎言如何被不可还原地暗示为真理的可能性。博尔赫斯提出的论点解释了证词作为其可能性条件的必要不可能性:“除了证人的可疑例外,没有一个美丽的词不是抽象的。”。这一论点基于胡塞尔的syncategorema理论(其语义取决于上下文的不完整单词)和指示词(基本上是偶然的单词);同样,他从康德那里汲取了想象力的作用和“仿佛”的影响。这篇文章展示了证词与审美判断之间的结构关系。这一发现的影响是多方面的,最重要的是谎言与真相之间的关系,这意味着谎言表明了真相的不可还原的可能性。这篇文章解释了证词作为其可能性条件的必要不可能性,豪尔赫·路易斯·博尔赫斯(Jorge Luis Borges)的博蒂弗尔(Beau-Tiful)一句话中预见到了这一论点,“没有一个美丽的词,除了证人之外,这不是一个抽象的词”。该论点基于胡塞尔的syncegorem(“不完整”的单词,其含义取决于上下文)和指示词(“基本上是偶然的”单词);因此,它取自康德,想象力的作用和“仿佛”的影响。
期刊介绍:
Ideas y Valores is a four-monthly publication (April, August and December) of the Department of Philosophy of the Universidad Nacional de Colombia, founded in 1951, which welcomes national and international contributions. Throughout its more than sixty years of existence, the journal''s objective has been to provide a space for the publication and dissemination of philosophical work carried out in Colombia. However, Ideas y Valores has always been in close contact with the philosophical work carried out in Latin America and the world. It currently publishes articles and reviews on all philosophical areas in Spanish, Portuguese and, occasionally, English. The journal also receives translations to Spanish of texts which have lost their copyrights or whose copyrights have been bought by or given to the translator and, by extension, to Ideas y Valores.