Book Review: On the Edges of Whiteness. Polish Refugees in British Colonial Africa during and after the Second World War by Jochen Lingelbach

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Q2 HISTORY War in History Pub Date : 2022-06-25 DOI:10.1177/09683445221102897a
Lidia Zessin-Jurek
{"title":"Book Review: On the Edges of Whiteness. Polish Refugees in British Colonial Africa during and after the Second World War by Jochen Lingelbach","authors":"Lidia Zessin-Jurek","doi":"10.1177/09683445221102897a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"the northern European bias of previous scholarship. However, the reasoning behind Greig’s decisions on which English or French memoirs to include or exclude are murkier. She has also made little effort to represent the men of the non-commissioned ranks. This is interesting, since Greig emphasizes the need to consider memoirists’ status and celebrates the presence of junior commissioned officers like Moyle Sherer and John Kincaid. Of the 14 memoirists of British origin in the bibliography, only Joseph Donaldson is from the lower ranks. I am not qualified to speak about missing French, Spanish, or Portuguese memoirs, but there are at least seven British privates and well over a dozen corporals and sergeants who have published accounts of their Peninsular War service during the period Greig is covering. Their absence from the book diminishes its value to British historians of the Peninsular War who rely heavily on these rankers’ first-person accounts. Issues of source selection aside, Greig’s transnational approach allows for many important new insights. Spanish authors were less likely than their British or French counterparts to be critical of military decisions in their memoirs. Where English publications were subtly political—with more of a propensity to dedicate their work to generals —it was the Spanish authors who wrote with more obvious agendas in the immediate aftermath of the conflict. Guerrilla leaders used their account of the Peninsular War ‘to lobby for positions of power under their preferred regime’ (p.115). Aristocratic generals seeking government rewards for loyal service issued their own war stories in print. The Spanish colonies’ wars of independence opened a market for these treatises to be consumed by new readers who read Peninsular accounts of resistance and liberation through their own distinct context. Demand for French memoirs saw a similar boost during the Franco-Prussian War in 1870–1871, when French readers sought tales of former glories to assuage the humiliation of this more recent defeat. There is no similar speculation of the impact of the Crimean War, though it would seem an obvious explanation for Greig’s observation that ‘colonial service narratives’ replaced Peninsular War accounts in the British memoir market of the 1850s and 1860s (p.160). Greig is especially elegant in describing the materiality of the books and the physical experience of reading them. She transports us, in evocative prose, to distant archives and vividly recalls things like flyleaf inscriptions, bindings, and illustrations. These details make this a refreshing and rewarding study of sources. Peninsular War memoirs’ ongoing popularity ensures that Dead Men Telling Tales will remain required background reading for many researchers.","PeriodicalId":44606,"journal":{"name":"War in History","volume":"29 1","pages":"750 - 752"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"War in History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09683445221102897a","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

the northern European bias of previous scholarship. However, the reasoning behind Greig’s decisions on which English or French memoirs to include or exclude are murkier. She has also made little effort to represent the men of the non-commissioned ranks. This is interesting, since Greig emphasizes the need to consider memoirists’ status and celebrates the presence of junior commissioned officers like Moyle Sherer and John Kincaid. Of the 14 memoirists of British origin in the bibliography, only Joseph Donaldson is from the lower ranks. I am not qualified to speak about missing French, Spanish, or Portuguese memoirs, but there are at least seven British privates and well over a dozen corporals and sergeants who have published accounts of their Peninsular War service during the period Greig is covering. Their absence from the book diminishes its value to British historians of the Peninsular War who rely heavily on these rankers’ first-person accounts. Issues of source selection aside, Greig’s transnational approach allows for many important new insights. Spanish authors were less likely than their British or French counterparts to be critical of military decisions in their memoirs. Where English publications were subtly political—with more of a propensity to dedicate their work to generals —it was the Spanish authors who wrote with more obvious agendas in the immediate aftermath of the conflict. Guerrilla leaders used their account of the Peninsular War ‘to lobby for positions of power under their preferred regime’ (p.115). Aristocratic generals seeking government rewards for loyal service issued their own war stories in print. The Spanish colonies’ wars of independence opened a market for these treatises to be consumed by new readers who read Peninsular accounts of resistance and liberation through their own distinct context. Demand for French memoirs saw a similar boost during the Franco-Prussian War in 1870–1871, when French readers sought tales of former glories to assuage the humiliation of this more recent defeat. There is no similar speculation of the impact of the Crimean War, though it would seem an obvious explanation for Greig’s observation that ‘colonial service narratives’ replaced Peninsular War accounts in the British memoir market of the 1850s and 1860s (p.160). Greig is especially elegant in describing the materiality of the books and the physical experience of reading them. She transports us, in evocative prose, to distant archives and vividly recalls things like flyleaf inscriptions, bindings, and illustrations. These details make this a refreshing and rewarding study of sources. Peninsular War memoirs’ ongoing popularity ensures that Dead Men Telling Tales will remain required background reading for many researchers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
书评:在白色的边缘。第二次世界大战期间和之后英属殖民地非洲的波兰难民
以前学术界对北欧的偏见。然而,格雷格决定包括或排除哪本英文或法文回忆录背后的原因更为模糊。她也几乎没有努力代表士官级别的男性。这很有趣,因为格雷格强调需要考虑回忆录作者的地位,并庆祝莫伊勒·谢勒和约翰·金凯德等初级军官的出现。在参考书目中的14位英国裔回忆录作者中,只有约瑟夫·唐纳森来自较低级别。我没有资格谈论失踪的法语、西班牙语或葡萄牙语回忆录,但至少有七名英国士兵和十几名下士和军士发表了格雷格报道期间他们在半岛战争中服役的记录。他们在书中的缺席削弱了它对英国半岛战争历史学家的价值,他们严重依赖这些愤怒者的第一人称叙述。撇开来源选择问题不谈,格雷格的跨国方法提供了许多重要的新见解。与英国或法国作家相比,西班牙作家在回忆录中对军事决策持批评态度的可能性较小。英国出版物具有微妙的政治性,更倾向于将其作品献给将军,而西班牙作家在冲突刚结束时就以更明显的议程写作。游击队领导人利用他们对半岛战争的描述“游说他们喜欢的政权下的权力职位”(第115页)。贵族将军们为忠诚的服务寻求政府奖励,并出版了自己的战争故事。西班牙殖民地的独立战争为新读者打开了一个市场,他们通过自己独特的背景阅读了关于抵抗和解放的半岛故事。1870年至1871年的普法战争期间,对法国回忆录的需求也出现了类似的增长,当时法国读者寻找昔日辉煌的故事来缓解最近这场失败的耻辱。关于克里米亚战争的影响,没有类似的猜测,尽管这似乎是对格雷格观察到的“殖民服务叙事”取代了19世纪50年代和19世纪60年代英国回忆录市场上对半岛战争的描述的一个明显解释(第160页)。格雷格在描述这些书的物质性和阅读它们的身体体验方面尤其优雅。她用令人回味的散文将我们带到遥远的档案馆,生动地回忆起落叶铭文、装订和插图等事物。这些细节使得这是一个令人耳目一新和有益的来源研究。半岛战争回忆录的持续流行确保了《死人讲故事》仍然是许多研究人员必读的背景读物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
War in History
War in History Multiple-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: War in History journal takes the view that military history should be integrated into a broader definition of history, and benefits from the insights provided by other approaches to history. Recognising that the study of war is more than simply the study of conflict, War in History embraces war in all its aspects: > Economic > Social > Political > Military Articles include the study of naval forces, maritime power and air forces, as well as more narrowly defined military matters. There is no restriction as to period: the journal is as receptive to the study of classical or feudal warfare as to Napoleonic. This journal provides you with a continuous update on war in history over many historical periods.
期刊最新文献
Book Review: Building the Army’s Backbone: Canadian Non-Commissioned Officers in the Second World War by Andrew L. Brown Book Review: Out of Line, Out of Place. A Global and Local History of World War I Internments by Rotem Kowner and Iris Rachamimov Book Review: A Question of Standing: The History of the CIA by Rhodri Jeffreys-Jones Book Review: Secession and Separatist Conflicts in Postcolonial Africa by Charles G. Thomas and Toyin Falola Book Review: Winning and Losing the Nuclear Peace: The Rise, Demise, and Revival of Arms Control by Michael Krepon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1