Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy for Open Abdomen in Surgical Reintervention after Curative Surgery of Peritoneal Malignancy Increases the Risk of Recurrence.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY Advances in Skin & Wound Care Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1097/ASW.0000000000000018
Thomas Rabel, Pierre-Emmanuel Bonnot, Omar Hadeedi, Vahan Kepenekian, Lorraine Bernard, Arnaud Friggeri, Olivier Glehen, Guillaume Passot
{"title":"Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy for Open Abdomen in Surgical Reintervention after Curative Surgery of Peritoneal Malignancy Increases the Risk of Recurrence.","authors":"Thomas Rabel, Pierre-Emmanuel Bonnot, Omar Hadeedi, Vahan Kepenekian, Lorraine Bernard, Arnaud Friggeri, Olivier Glehen, Guillaume Passot","doi":"10.1097/ASW.0000000000000018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Negative-pressure wound therapy for open abdomen (NPWTOA) helps reduce the risk of abdominal compartment syndrome. However, the risk of recurrence of cancer is unclear when NPWTOA is applied after oncologic resection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of NPWTOA used for major complications on patients treated with cytoreductive surgery for peritoneal malignancy (PM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients who underwent an NPWTOA after potentially curative surgery of PM in a single institution were included. These patients were pair matched 1:3 on the Peritoneal Cancer Index, completeness of cytoreduction using a scoring index, and PM origin with patients who underwent surgical reintervention without NPWTOA after curative surgery of PM. Survival among the two groups was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2011 and 2017, among 719 curative surgeries for PM, 13 patients underwent an NPWTOA after surgical reintervention. Researchers paired 9 of these patients to 27 others without NPWTOA after surgical reintervention. Median overall survival was 4.8 and 35 months (P = .391), and median disease-free survival was 4.0 and 13.9 months (P = .022) for the NPWTOA and non-NPWTOA groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of the NPWTOA during surgical reintervention after curative surgery for PM may increase the risk of early recurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":7489,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ASW.0000000000000018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Negative-pressure wound therapy for open abdomen (NPWTOA) helps reduce the risk of abdominal compartment syndrome. However, the risk of recurrence of cancer is unclear when NPWTOA is applied after oncologic resection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of NPWTOA used for major complications on patients treated with cytoreductive surgery for peritoneal malignancy (PM).

Methods: All patients who underwent an NPWTOA after potentially curative surgery of PM in a single institution were included. These patients were pair matched 1:3 on the Peritoneal Cancer Index, completeness of cytoreduction using a scoring index, and PM origin with patients who underwent surgical reintervention without NPWTOA after curative surgery of PM. Survival among the two groups was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results: Between 2011 and 2017, among 719 curative surgeries for PM, 13 patients underwent an NPWTOA after surgical reintervention. Researchers paired 9 of these patients to 27 others without NPWTOA after surgical reintervention. Median overall survival was 4.8 and 35 months (P = .391), and median disease-free survival was 4.0 and 13.9 months (P = .022) for the NPWTOA and non-NPWTOA groups, respectively.

Conclusions: The use of the NPWTOA during surgical reintervention after curative surgery for PM may increase the risk of early recurrence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹膜恶性肿瘤根治性手术后再手术治疗开放性腹部的负压伤口治疗增加了复发的风险。
目的:负压伤口治疗开放性腹部(NPWTOA)有助于降低腹腔隔室综合征的风险。然而,当肿瘤切除后应用NPWTOA时,癌症复发的风险尚不清楚。本研究的目的是评估NPWTOA用于腹膜恶性肿瘤(PM)细胞减灭术患者主要并发症的效果。方法:纳入所有在单一机构接受潜在治疗性PM手术后接受NPWTOA的患者。这些患者在腹膜癌症指数、使用评分指数的细胞减少的完整性和PM来源方面与PM治疗性手术后在无NPWTOA的情况下接受手术再干预的患者配对,匹配比例为1:3。使用Kaplan-Meier方法比较两组患者的生存率。结果:2011年至2017年间,在719例PM治疗性手术中,有13名患者在手术再干预后接受了NPWTOA。研究人员将其中9名患者与27名手术后无NPWTOA的患者配对。NPWTOA和非NPWTOA组的中位总生存期分别为4.8个月和35个月(P=.391),无病生存期的中位分别为4.0个月和13.9个月(P=0.022)。结论:在PM根治性手术后的手术再干预中使用NPWTOA可能会增加早期复发的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Skin & Wound Care
Advances in Skin & Wound Care DERMATOLOGY-NURSING
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
271
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal, Advances in Skin & Wound Care is highly regarded for its unique balance of cutting-edge original research and practical clinical management articles on wounds and other problems of skin integrity. Each issue features CME/CE for physicians and nurses, the first journal in the field to regularly offer continuing education for both disciplines.
期刊最新文献
"Soap Scrap" Technique: A Tissue-Preserving Approach to Treating Wounds With Undermining or Pockets: Erratum. Celebrating the Peer Review Process. Chronic Wound Caused by Lymphorrhea after Skin Abscess Drainage on Lower Extremity: A Case Report. COVID-19 and Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries: A Systematic Review: Erratum. Development of Postsurgical Pyoderma Gangrenosum with New Keloid after Keloid Resection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1