Impact of junior doctor strikes on patient flow in the emergency department: a cross-sectional analysis.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE European Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-16 DOI:10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001093
Svenja Ravioli, Raeesa Jina, Omar Risk, Fleur Cantle
{"title":"Impact of junior doctor strikes on patient flow in the emergency department: a cross-sectional analysis.","authors":"Svenja Ravioli, Raeesa Jina, Omar Risk, Fleur Cantle","doi":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and importance: </strong>Healthcare worker strikes are a global phenomenon. Mortality and morbidity seem to be unaffected by doctor strikes, but there is little evidence on the impact on emergency department (ED) flow and patient characteristics. In March and April 2023, two consecutive UK junior doctor strikes occurred.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study investigated the impact of junior doctor strikes on ED patient flow. Additionally, variation in patient presentations was compared between non-strike and strike days.</p><p><strong>Design, setting and participants: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted at King's College Hospital ED, a university hospital in London. All ED attendances during the 72- and 96-hour strike actions were compared with the corresponding non-strike days of the previous week.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and analysis: </strong>National key performance indicators (KPIs) were analysed and compared between non-strike and strike days. Patients' demographics, acuity and diagnoses were compared. Outcome measures included number of 4-hour breaches, number of patients admitted or discharged and ED mortality. Staff seniority was categorised into levels for analysis.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>There was increased ED patient flow during strike days with a significantly shorter total time in department in March [240 min (IQR 155-469) vs. 286 min (IQR 198.5-523.5), P  < 0.001] and in April [222.5 min (IQR 147-351) vs. 251.5 min (IQR 174-443), P  < 0.001]. Time to first clinician, treatment, and decision to admit were all shorter during both strike actions. Number of attendances, acuity, diagnoses, admission, discharge, and mortality rates were similar during strike and non-strike days. Staffing numbers were lower or equivalent on strike days but level of seniority was higher ( P  < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The improved KPIs and increased patient flow during strike days, while multifactorial, seem largely attributed to the higher number of senior staff. Patient presentations and outcomes were unaffected by junior doctor strike action.</p>","PeriodicalId":11893,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001093","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and importance: Healthcare worker strikes are a global phenomenon. Mortality and morbidity seem to be unaffected by doctor strikes, but there is little evidence on the impact on emergency department (ED) flow and patient characteristics. In March and April 2023, two consecutive UK junior doctor strikes occurred.

Objectives: This study investigated the impact of junior doctor strikes on ED patient flow. Additionally, variation in patient presentations was compared between non-strike and strike days.

Design, setting and participants: This cross-sectional study was conducted at King's College Hospital ED, a university hospital in London. All ED attendances during the 72- and 96-hour strike actions were compared with the corresponding non-strike days of the previous week.

Outcome measures and analysis: National key performance indicators (KPIs) were analysed and compared between non-strike and strike days. Patients' demographics, acuity and diagnoses were compared. Outcome measures included number of 4-hour breaches, number of patients admitted or discharged and ED mortality. Staff seniority was categorised into levels for analysis.

Main results: There was increased ED patient flow during strike days with a significantly shorter total time in department in March [240 min (IQR 155-469) vs. 286 min (IQR 198.5-523.5), P  < 0.001] and in April [222.5 min (IQR 147-351) vs. 251.5 min (IQR 174-443), P  < 0.001]. Time to first clinician, treatment, and decision to admit were all shorter during both strike actions. Number of attendances, acuity, diagnoses, admission, discharge, and mortality rates were similar during strike and non-strike days. Staffing numbers were lower or equivalent on strike days but level of seniority was higher ( P  < 0.001).

Conclusion: The improved KPIs and increased patient flow during strike days, while multifactorial, seem largely attributed to the higher number of senior staff. Patient presentations and outcomes were unaffected by junior doctor strike action.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初级医生罢工对急诊科病人流动的影响:横断面分析。
背景和重要性:医护人员罢工是一种全球性现象。死亡率和发病率似乎不受医生罢工的影响,但几乎没有证据表明这会对急诊科(ED)的流量和患者特征产生影响。2023年3月和4月,英国初级医生连续两次罢工。目的:本研究调查初级医生罢工对ED患者流动的影响。此外,还比较了非罢工日和罢工日患者表现的差异。设计、设置和参与者:这项横断面研究在伦敦大学医院国王学院医院ED进行。将72小时和96小时罢工期间的所有急诊就诊人数与前一周相应的非罢工天数进行了比较。结果测量和分析:分析并比较了非罢工日和罢工日的国家关键绩效指标。比较患者的人口统计学、视力和诊断。结果指标包括4小时的突破次数、入院或出院的患者人数和ED死亡率。工作人员的资历被分为几个级别进行分析。主要结果:罢工期间ED患者流量增加,3月份住院总时间明显缩短[240 最小值(IQR 155-469)vs.286 最小值(IQR 198.5-523.5),P 结论:罢工期间KPI的改善和患者流量的增加虽然是多因素的,但似乎主要归因于高级员工的增加。初级医生罢工行动不影响患者的表现和结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
27.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Emergency Medicine is the official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine. It is devoted to serving the European emergency medicine community and to promoting European standards of training, diagnosis and care in this rapidly growing field. Published bimonthly, the Journal offers original papers on all aspects of acute injury and sudden illness, including: emergency medicine, anaesthesiology, cardiology, disaster medicine, intensive care, internal medicine, orthopaedics, paediatrics, toxicology and trauma care. It addresses issues on the organization of emergency services in hospitals and in the community and examines postgraduate training from European and global perspectives. The Journal also publishes papers focusing on the different models of emergency healthcare delivery in Europe and beyond. With a multidisciplinary approach, the European Journal of Emergency Medicine publishes scientific research, topical reviews, news of meetings and events of interest to the emergency medicine community. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool. ​
期刊最新文献
Prehospital interventions and outcomes in traumatic cardiac arrest: a population-based cohort study using the Danish Helicopter Emergency Medical Services data. The association between prehospital post-return of spontaneous circulation core temperature and survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Older age and risk for delayed abdominal pain care in the emergency department. Providing urgent and emergency care to children and young people: training requirements for emergency medicine specialty trainees. Effect of early initiation of noninvasive ventilation in patients transported by emergency medical service for acute heart failure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1