Once-weekly insulin icodec versus once-daily insulin degludec as part of a basal-bolus regimen in individuals with type 1 diabetes (ONWARDS 6): a phase 3a, randomised, open-label, treat-to-target trial.

IF 98.4 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL The Lancet Pub Date : 2023-11-04 Epub Date: 2023-10-17 DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02179-7
David Russell-Jones, Tetsuya Babazono, Roman Cailleteau, Susanne Engberg, Concetta Irace, Maiken Ina Siegismund Kjaersgaard, Chantal Mathieu, Julio Rosenstock, Vincent Woo, David C Klonoff
{"title":"Once-weekly insulin icodec versus once-daily insulin degludec as part of a basal-bolus regimen in individuals with type 1 diabetes (ONWARDS 6): a phase 3a, randomised, open-label, treat-to-target trial.","authors":"David Russell-Jones, Tetsuya Babazono, Roman Cailleteau, Susanne Engberg, Concetta Irace, Maiken Ina Siegismund Kjaersgaard, Chantal Mathieu, Julio Rosenstock, Vincent Woo, David C Klonoff","doi":"10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02179-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>ONWARDS 6 compared the efficacy and safety of once-weekly subcutaneous insulin icodec (icodec) and once-daily insulin degludec (degludec) in adults with type 1 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This 52-week (26-week main phase plus a 26-week safety extension), randomised, open-label, treat-to-target, phase 3a trial was done at 99 sites across 12 countries. Adults with type 1 diabetes (glycated haemoglobin [HbA<sub>1c</sub>] <10·0% [86 mmol/mol]) were randomly assigned (1:1) to once-weekly icodec or once-daily degludec, both in combination with insulin aspart (two or more daily injections). The primary endpoint was change in HbA<sub>1c</sub> from baseline to week 26, tested for non-inferiority (0·3 percentage point margin) in all randomly assigned participants. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04848480, and is now complete.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between April 30 and Oct 15, 2021, of 655 participants screened, 582 participants were randomly assigned to icodec (n=290) or degludec (n=292). At week 26, from baseline values of 7·59% (icodec) and 7·63% (degludec), estimated mean changes in HbA<sub>1c</sub> were -0·47 percentage points and -0·51 percentage points, respectively (estimated treatment difference 0·05 percentage points [95% CI -0·13 to 0·23]), confirming non-inferiority of icodec to degludec (p=0·0065). Overall rate of combined clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemia (baseline to week 26) was statistically significantly higher with icodec than degludec (19·9 vs 10·4 events per patient-year of exposure; estimated rate ratio 1·9 [95% CI 1·5 to 2·3]; p<0·0001). The rate was also statistically significantly higher with icodec than degludec when evaluated over 57 weeks (52 weeks plus a 5-week follow-up period). 39 serious adverse events were reported in 24 (8%) participants receiving icodec, and 25 serious adverse events were reported in 20 (7%) participants receiving degludec. One participant in the icodec group died; this was judged unlikely to be due to the trial product.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>In adults with type 1 diabetes, once-weekly icodec showed non-inferiority to once-daily degludec in HbA<sub>1c</sub> reduction at week 26, with statistically significantly higher rates of combined clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemia. For icodec, time below 3·0 mmol/L (<54 mg/dL) was at the threshold of the internationally recommended target (<1%) during weeks 22-26 and below target during weeks 48-52.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Novo Nordisk.</p>","PeriodicalId":18014,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet","volume":" ","pages":"1636-1647"},"PeriodicalIF":98.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02179-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: ONWARDS 6 compared the efficacy and safety of once-weekly subcutaneous insulin icodec (icodec) and once-daily insulin degludec (degludec) in adults with type 1 diabetes.

Methods: This 52-week (26-week main phase plus a 26-week safety extension), randomised, open-label, treat-to-target, phase 3a trial was done at 99 sites across 12 countries. Adults with type 1 diabetes (glycated haemoglobin [HbA1c] <10·0% [86 mmol/mol]) were randomly assigned (1:1) to once-weekly icodec or once-daily degludec, both in combination with insulin aspart (two or more daily injections). The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c from baseline to week 26, tested for non-inferiority (0·3 percentage point margin) in all randomly assigned participants. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04848480, and is now complete.

Findings: Between April 30 and Oct 15, 2021, of 655 participants screened, 582 participants were randomly assigned to icodec (n=290) or degludec (n=292). At week 26, from baseline values of 7·59% (icodec) and 7·63% (degludec), estimated mean changes in HbA1c were -0·47 percentage points and -0·51 percentage points, respectively (estimated treatment difference 0·05 percentage points [95% CI -0·13 to 0·23]), confirming non-inferiority of icodec to degludec (p=0·0065). Overall rate of combined clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemia (baseline to week 26) was statistically significantly higher with icodec than degludec (19·9 vs 10·4 events per patient-year of exposure; estimated rate ratio 1·9 [95% CI 1·5 to 2·3]; p<0·0001). The rate was also statistically significantly higher with icodec than degludec when evaluated over 57 weeks (52 weeks plus a 5-week follow-up period). 39 serious adverse events were reported in 24 (8%) participants receiving icodec, and 25 serious adverse events were reported in 20 (7%) participants receiving degludec. One participant in the icodec group died; this was judged unlikely to be due to the trial product.

Interpretation: In adults with type 1 diabetes, once-weekly icodec showed non-inferiority to once-daily degludec in HbA1c reduction at week 26, with statistically significantly higher rates of combined clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemia. For icodec, time below 3·0 mmol/L (<54 mg/dL) was at the threshold of the internationally recommended target (<1%) during weeks 22-26 and below target during weeks 48-52.

Funding: Novo Nordisk.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为1型糖尿病患者基础推注方案的一部分,每周一次胰岛素icodec与每天一次胰岛素去糖:一项3a期、随机、开放标签、靶向治疗试验。
背景:ONWARDS 6比较了每周一次皮下注射胰岛素icodec(icodec)和每日一次胰岛素degludec(degludec)治疗成人1型糖尿病的疗效和安全性。方法:这项为期52周(26周的主要阶段加上26周的安全性延长)的随机、开放标签、靶向治疗的3a期试验在12个国家的99个地点进行。从基线到第26周,患有1型糖尿病(糖化血红蛋白[HbA1c]1c)的成年人在所有随机分配的参与者中进行了非劣效性测试(0.3个百分点的差距)。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT04848480)注册,现已完成。研究结果:在2021年4月30日至10月15日期间,在655名接受筛查的参与者中,582名参与者被随机分配到icodec(n=290)或degludec(n=292)。在第26周,与基线值7.59%(icodec)和7.63%(degludec)相比,HbA1c的估计平均变化分别为-0.47个百分点和-0.51个百分点(估计治疗差异0.05个百分点[95%CI-0.13-0.23]),证实了icodec对degludec的非劣效性(p=0.0065)。联合临床显著或严重低血糖的总发生率(基线至第26周)在统计学上显著高于替格德(每名患者暴露一年19.9 vs 10.4事件;估计发生率比1.9[95%CI 1.5~2.3];p解释:在患有1型糖尿病的成年人中,在第26周,每周一次的icodec在HbA1c降低方面表现出非劣效性,具有统计学意义的合并临床显著或严重低血糖的发生率显著高于每日一次的degludec。对于icodec,时间低于3.0 mmol/L(资助:诺和诺德。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The Lancet
The Lancet 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
148.10
自引率
0.70%
发文量
2220
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Lancet is a world-leading source of clinical, public health, and global health knowledge. It was founded in 1823 by Thomas Wakley and has been an independent, international weekly general medical journal since then. The journal has an Impact Factor of 168.9, ranking first among 167 general and internal medicine journals globally. It also has a Scopus CiteScore of 133·2, ranking it second among 830 general medicine journals. The Lancet's mission is to make science widely available to serve and transform society, positively impacting people's lives. Throughout its history, The Lancet has been dedicated to addressing urgent topics, initiating debate, providing context for scientific research, and influencing decision makers worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Non-communicable diseases: can implementation research change the game for policy and practice? Priorities for sickle cell disease global research and implementation. Addressing global gun violence: a Lancet Commission on Global Gun Violence and Health. Changing the culture of blood culture. The time to address the antibiotic pipeline and access crisis is now.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1