The Prognostic Role of Corticosteroid Administration in Hospitalized Patients with Severe COVID-19: A Cross-sectional Study.

Mohammad Ali Yaghoubi, Hassan Mehrad-Majd, Ali Moradi, Mohammad Moein Vakilzadeh, Zahra Mazloum Khorasani, Mahmoud Ghavi, Amirhossein Sahebkar
{"title":"The Prognostic Role of Corticosteroid Administration in Hospitalized Patients with Severe COVID-19: A Cross-sectional Study.","authors":"Mohammad Ali Yaghoubi, Hassan Mehrad-Majd, Ali Moradi, Mohammad Moein Vakilzadeh, Zahra Mazloum Khorasani, Mahmoud Ghavi, Amirhossein Sahebkar","doi":"10.2174/0127722708245041230921064257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic is a recent global issue with no established consensus on treatments. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the impact of corticosteroid (CS) pulses on the prognosis of COVID-19 patients admitted to hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective single-center cross-sectional study, we used hospital records of all consecutive patients aged 18 years or older admitted to the hospital from July 23rd to September 23rd, 2021. All patients included in the study had confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing and required hospitalization. Demographic and clinical information, as well as patient outcomes, were collected. Treatment details, including the type(s), cumulative doses, and duration of administered corticosteroids, were also recorded. CS pulse therapy was defined as the daily administration of 24 mg or more of dexamethasone or its equivalents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 500 patients with COVID-19 were included in this study, comprising 122 patients who received CS pulse therapy and 378 patients who did not. A higher mortality rate was observed in patients receiving CS pulse therapy (42.6%) compared to the other group (28%) (p =0.04). Additionally, logistic regression analysis showed an increased mortality risk in patients receiving CS pulse therapy in the crude model (OR=1.54, 95% CI: 1.01-2.27, p <0.01). However, after adjusting for confounding factors, such as mechanical ventilation and ICU admission, the results were reversed (OR=0.21, 95% CI: 0.07-0.62, p <0.01). ; Conclusion: In the findings of the current study, treatment with CS pulses was shown to significantly enhance recovery in patients with non-severe COVID-19.</p>","PeriodicalId":29815,"journal":{"name":"Recent Advances in Inflammation & Allergy Drug Discovery","volume":" ","pages":"152-157"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recent Advances in Inflammation & Allergy Drug Discovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0127722708245041230921064257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: The COVID-19 pandemic is a recent global issue with no established consensus on treatments. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the impact of corticosteroid (CS) pulses on the prognosis of COVID-19 patients admitted to hospitals.

Methods: In this retrospective single-center cross-sectional study, we used hospital records of all consecutive patients aged 18 years or older admitted to the hospital from July 23rd to September 23rd, 2021. All patients included in the study had confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing and required hospitalization. Demographic and clinical information, as well as patient outcomes, were collected. Treatment details, including the type(s), cumulative doses, and duration of administered corticosteroids, were also recorded. CS pulse therapy was defined as the daily administration of 24 mg or more of dexamethasone or its equivalents.

Results: A total of 500 patients with COVID-19 were included in this study, comprising 122 patients who received CS pulse therapy and 378 patients who did not. A higher mortality rate was observed in patients receiving CS pulse therapy (42.6%) compared to the other group (28%) (p =0.04). Additionally, logistic regression analysis showed an increased mortality risk in patients receiving CS pulse therapy in the crude model (OR=1.54, 95% CI: 1.01-2.27, p <0.01). However, after adjusting for confounding factors, such as mechanical ventilation and ICU admission, the results were reversed (OR=0.21, 95% CI: 0.07-0.62, p <0.01). ; Conclusion: In the findings of the current study, treatment with CS pulses was shown to significantly enhance recovery in patients with non-severe COVID-19.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
皮质类固醇在重症新冠肺炎住院患者中的预后作用:一项跨部门研究。
背景和目的:新冠肺炎大流行是最近的一个全球性问题,在治疗方面尚未达成共识。因此,本研究的目的是评估皮质类固醇(CS)脉冲对住院新冠肺炎患者预后的影响。方法:在这项回顾性单中心横断面研究中,我们使用了2021年7月23日至9月23日收治的所有连续18岁或以上患者的医院记录。研究中的所有患者都已通过聚合酶链式反应(PCR)检测确认感染了严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型,需要住院治疗。收集人口统计学和临床信息以及患者结果。还记录了治疗细节,包括皮质类固醇的类型、累积剂量和持续时间。CS脉冲治疗定义为每天给予24mg或更多地塞米松或其等效物。结果:共有500名新冠肺炎患者被纳入本研究,其中122名患者接受了CS脉冲治疗,378名患者未接受CS脉冲治疗。接受CS脉冲治疗的患者的死亡率(42.6%)高于另一组(28%)(p=0.04),逻辑回归分析显示,在粗模型中,接受CS脉冲治疗的患者的死亡率风险增加(OR=1.54,95%CI:1.01-2.27,p结论:在当前研究的结果中,CS脉冲治疗可显著提高非严重新冠肺炎患者的恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
The Role of Inflammatory and Hemostatic Markers in the Prediction of Severe Acute Pancreatitis: An Observational Cohort Study. Inflammatory Myopathies and Autoimmune Gluten-related Disorders: A Scoping Review of Pathophysiological Interconnections and Hypothesis. The Potential Anti-psoriatic Effects of Andrographolide: A Comparative Study to Topical Corticosteroids. Modulation of the Immune System Mechanisms using Probiotic Bacteria in Allergic Diseases: Focus on Allergic Retinitis and Food Allergies. Decrypting the Pathological Pathways in IgA Nephropathy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1