Hysterectomy and thyroid cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Roberto Fabiani , Patrizia Rosignoli , Irene Giacchetta , Manuela Chiavarini
{"title":"Hysterectomy and thyroid cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Roberto Fabiani ,&nbsp;Patrizia Rosignoli ,&nbsp;Irene Giacchetta ,&nbsp;Manuela Chiavarini","doi":"10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Incidence rates of thyroid cancer have increased. Recent studies findings suggest that women who underwent a hysterectomy have an elevated relative risk of thyroid cancer. The aim of our meta-analysis is to summarize the evidence about the association between hysterectomy and thyroid cancer risk.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus database were searched for studies published up to 5 September 2023. The PRISMA statement was followed. Heterogeneity was explored with Q statistic and the I2 statistic. Publication bias was assessed with Begg's and Egger's tests.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixteen studies met the criteria. The pooled analysis showed a significantly 64% increment of thyroid cancer risk in association with any hysterectomy (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.48–1.81; I2 = 28.68%, <em>p</em> = 0.156). Hysterectomy without oophorectomy was a stronger predictor of risk than hysterectomy with oophorectomy. The pooled analysis of data regarding hysterectomy without oophorectomy showed a statistically significant increment of thyroid cancer risk by 59%. Hysterectomy with oophorectomy was associated with an increase of thyroid cancer risk of 39% (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.16–1.67; I2 = 42.10%, <em>p</em> = 0.049). Significant publication bias was not detected.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings help with decision making around these surgeries.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36311,"journal":{"name":"Global Epidemiology","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10582318/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590113323000251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Incidence rates of thyroid cancer have increased. Recent studies findings suggest that women who underwent a hysterectomy have an elevated relative risk of thyroid cancer. The aim of our meta-analysis is to summarize the evidence about the association between hysterectomy and thyroid cancer risk.

Methods

PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus database were searched for studies published up to 5 September 2023. The PRISMA statement was followed. Heterogeneity was explored with Q statistic and the I2 statistic. Publication bias was assessed with Begg's and Egger's tests.

Results

Sixteen studies met the criteria. The pooled analysis showed a significantly 64% increment of thyroid cancer risk in association with any hysterectomy (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.48–1.81; I2 = 28.68%, p = 0.156). Hysterectomy without oophorectomy was a stronger predictor of risk than hysterectomy with oophorectomy. The pooled analysis of data regarding hysterectomy without oophorectomy showed a statistically significant increment of thyroid cancer risk by 59%. Hysterectomy with oophorectomy was associated with an increase of thyroid cancer risk of 39% (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.16–1.67; I2 = 42.10%, p = 0.049). Significant publication bias was not detected.

Conclusions

Our findings help with decision making around these surgeries.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
子宫切除术与甲状腺癌症风险的系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景癌症的发病率有所上升。最近的研究结果表明,接受子宫切除术的女性患甲状腺癌症的相对风险升高。我们的荟萃分析的目的是总结子宫切除术与甲状腺癌症风险之间的相关性证据。方法检索PubMed、Web of Science和Scopus数据库中截至2023年9月5日发表的研究。遵循了PRISMA的声明。利用Q统计量和I2统计量对异质性进行了探讨。发表偏倚通过Begg和Egger测试进行评估。结果16项研究符合标准。汇总分析显示,与任何子宫切除术相关的甲状腺癌症风险显著增加64%(OR 1.64,95%CI 1.48-1.81;I2=28.68%,p=0.156)。不经卵巢切除术的子宫切除术比经卵巢切除术的子宫切除手术更能预测风险。未经卵巢切除术的子宫切除术数据汇总分析显示,甲状腺癌症风险增加了59%,具有统计学意义。子宫切除术和卵巢切除术与甲状腺癌症风险增加39%相关(OR 1.39,95%CI 1.16–1.67;I2=42.10%,p=0.049)。未发现显著的发表偏倚。结论我们的研究结果有助于围绕这些手术做出决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Epidemiology
Global Epidemiology Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
39 days
期刊最新文献
Academic performance and associated factors among female university students Exploring diseases burden in HIV population: Results from the CHAO (Comorbidities in HIV/AIDS outpatients) cross-sectional study in Kenya What constitutes valid evidence of causation? Gas stoves and childhood asthma revisited Letter to the editor regarding: “Challenging unverified assumptions in causal claims: Do gas stoves increase risk of pediatric asthma?” Identification of population multimorbidity patterns in 3.9 million patients from Bogota in 2018
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1