Working memory capacity predicts focus back effort under different task demands

IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Consciousness and Cognition Pub Date : 2023-10-17 DOI:10.1016/j.concog.2023.103589
Hong He , Yunyun Chen , Xuemin Zhang , Qiang Liu
{"title":"Working memory capacity predicts focus back effort under different task demands","authors":"Hong He ,&nbsp;Yunyun Chen ,&nbsp;Xuemin Zhang ,&nbsp;Qiang Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.concog.2023.103589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>According to the cognitive flexibility view, individuals with higher cognitive control ability are more flexible in experiencing on task or mind wandering during tasks with different loads. On the other hand, the resource-control theory posits that executive control is essential for allocating attentional resources between mind wandering and tasks. Focus back effort may reflect the adjustment of executive control in the resource-control theory. Here, 121 participants completed two span tasks, as well as high- and low-load tasks, while mind wandering and focus back effort were measured. Our findings indicated that mind wandering was influenced by working memory capacity (WMC) and focus back effort. Additionally, participants demonstrated a higher focus back effort during the higher load task. This effect was particularly pronounced in individuals with lower WMC, which was treated as a continuous variable. These findings integrate the cognitive flexibility view and resource-control theory to describe how individuals modulate mind wandering.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51358,"journal":{"name":"Consciousness and Cognition","volume":"116 ","pages":"Article 103589"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Consciousness and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053810023001265","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to the cognitive flexibility view, individuals with higher cognitive control ability are more flexible in experiencing on task or mind wandering during tasks with different loads. On the other hand, the resource-control theory posits that executive control is essential for allocating attentional resources between mind wandering and tasks. Focus back effort may reflect the adjustment of executive control in the resource-control theory. Here, 121 participants completed two span tasks, as well as high- and low-load tasks, while mind wandering and focus back effort were measured. Our findings indicated that mind wandering was influenced by working memory capacity (WMC) and focus back effort. Additionally, participants demonstrated a higher focus back effort during the higher load task. This effect was particularly pronounced in individuals with lower WMC, which was treated as a continuous variable. These findings integrate the cognitive flexibility view and resource-control theory to describe how individuals modulate mind wandering.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工作记忆容量预测不同任务需求下的专注力。
认知灵活性观点认为,认知控制能力较高的个体在不同负荷的任务中,在任务中体验或走神时更具灵活性。另一方面,资源控制理论认为,执行控制对于在走神和任务之间分配注意力资源至关重要。集中精力可能反映了资源控制理论中执行控制的调整。在这里,121名参与者完成了两项跨度任务,以及高负荷和低负荷任务,同时测量了走神和专注力。我们的研究结果表明,走神受到工作记忆能力(WMC)和专注力的影响。此外,参与者在高负荷任务中表现出更高的专注力。这种影响在WMC较低的个体中尤为明显,WMC被视为一个连续变量。这些发现结合了认知灵活性观点和资源控制理论来描述个体如何调节走神。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Consciousness and Cognition
Consciousness and Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal provides a forum for a natural-science approach to the issues of consciousness, voluntary control, and self. The journal features empirical research (in the form of regular articles and short reports) and theoretical articles. Integrative theoretical and critical literature reviews, and tutorial reviews are also published. The journal aims to be both scientifically rigorous and open to novel contributions.
期刊最新文献
On sensory similarities. Shape tasting: A comparative evaluation of crossmodal correspondence in wine tasting. Top-down and bottom-up attentional responses to manipulations of perceptual organization in a complex visual Image: A flicker task study using a medieval mosaic as a case study. Method matters: Diverging patterns in online measures of temporal binding. Mind-Wandering Enhances Learning under Uncertainty: Insights from Iowa Gambling Task.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1