Rates Among Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19 Treated With Convalescent Plasma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Jonathon W. Senefeld PhD , Ellen K. Gorman BS , Patrick W. Johnson BS , M. Erin Moir PhD , Stephen A. Klassen PhD , Rickey E. Carter PhD , Nigel S. Paneth MD , David J. Sullivan MD , Olaf H. Morkeberg BA , R. Scott Wright MD , DeLisa Fairweather PhD , Katelyn A. Bruno PhD , Shmuel Shoham MD , Evan M. Bloch MBChB, MS , Daniele Focosi MD , Jeffrey P. Henderson MD, PhD , Justin E. Juskewitch MD, PhD , Liise-Anne Pirofski MD , Brenda J. Grossman MD, MPH , Aaron A.R. Tobian MD, PhD , Michael J. Joyner MD
{"title":"Rates Among Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19 Treated With Convalescent Plasma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Jonathon W. Senefeld PhD ,&nbsp;Ellen K. Gorman BS ,&nbsp;Patrick W. Johnson BS ,&nbsp;M. Erin Moir PhD ,&nbsp;Stephen A. Klassen PhD ,&nbsp;Rickey E. Carter PhD ,&nbsp;Nigel S. Paneth MD ,&nbsp;David J. Sullivan MD ,&nbsp;Olaf H. Morkeberg BA ,&nbsp;R. Scott Wright MD ,&nbsp;DeLisa Fairweather PhD ,&nbsp;Katelyn A. Bruno PhD ,&nbsp;Shmuel Shoham MD ,&nbsp;Evan M. Bloch MBChB, MS ,&nbsp;Daniele Focosi MD ,&nbsp;Jeffrey P. Henderson MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Justin E. Juskewitch MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Liise-Anne Pirofski MD ,&nbsp;Brenda J. Grossman MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Aaron A.R. Tobian MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Michael J. Joyner MD","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To examine the association of COVID-19 convalescent plasma transfusion with mortality and the differences between subgroups in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>On October 26, 2022, a systematic search was performed for clinical studies of COVID-19 convalescent plasma in the literature from January 1, 2020, to October 26, 2022. Randomized clinical trials and matched cohort studies investigating COVID-19 convalescent plasma transfusion compared with standard of care treatment or placebo among hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 were included. The electronic search yielded 3841 unique records, of which 744 were considered for full-text screening. The selection process was performed independently by a panel of 5 reviewers. The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Data were extracted by 5 independent reviewers in duplicate and pooled using an inverse-variance random effects model. The prespecified end point was all-cause mortality during hospitalization.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty-nine randomized clinical trials enrolling 21,529 participants and 70 matched cohort studies enrolling 50,160 participants were included in the systematic review. Separate meta-analyses reported that transfusion of COVID-19 convalescent plasma was associated with a decrease in mortality compared with the control cohort for both randomized clinical trials (odds ratio [OR], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.76-1.00) and matched cohort studies (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.66-0.88). The meta-analysis of subgroups revealed 2 important findings. First, treatment with convalescent plasma containing high antibody levels was associated with a decrease in mortality compared with convalescent plasma containing low antibody levels (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.99). Second, earlier treatment with COVID-19 convalescent plasma was associated with a decrease in mortality compared with the later treatment cohort (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.82).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>During COVID-19 convalescent plasma use was associated with a 13% reduced risk of mortality, implying a mortality benefit for hospitalized patients with COVID-19, particularly those treated with convalescent plasma containing high antibody levels treated earlier in the disease course.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5c/54/main.PMC10582279.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454823000590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective

To examine the association of COVID-19 convalescent plasma transfusion with mortality and the differences between subgroups in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

Patients and Methods

On October 26, 2022, a systematic search was performed for clinical studies of COVID-19 convalescent plasma in the literature from January 1, 2020, to October 26, 2022. Randomized clinical trials and matched cohort studies investigating COVID-19 convalescent plasma transfusion compared with standard of care treatment or placebo among hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 were included. The electronic search yielded 3841 unique records, of which 744 were considered for full-text screening. The selection process was performed independently by a panel of 5 reviewers. The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Data were extracted by 5 independent reviewers in duplicate and pooled using an inverse-variance random effects model. The prespecified end point was all-cause mortality during hospitalization.

Results

Thirty-nine randomized clinical trials enrolling 21,529 participants and 70 matched cohort studies enrolling 50,160 participants were included in the systematic review. Separate meta-analyses reported that transfusion of COVID-19 convalescent plasma was associated with a decrease in mortality compared with the control cohort for both randomized clinical trials (odds ratio [OR], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.76-1.00) and matched cohort studies (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.66-0.88). The meta-analysis of subgroups revealed 2 important findings. First, treatment with convalescent plasma containing high antibody levels was associated with a decrease in mortality compared with convalescent plasma containing low antibody levels (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.99). Second, earlier treatment with COVID-19 convalescent plasma was associated with a decrease in mortality compared with the later treatment cohort (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.82).

Conclusion

During COVID-19 convalescent plasma use was associated with a 13% reduced risk of mortality, implying a mortality benefit for hospitalized patients with COVID-19, particularly those treated with convalescent plasma containing high antibody levels treated earlier in the disease course.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎患者康复期血浆治疗率的系统评价和Meta-Analysis。
目的:研究新冠肺炎恢复期血浆输注与死亡率的关系以及新冠肺炎住院患者亚组之间的差异。患者和方法:2022年10月26日,系统检索2020年1月1日至2022年10日文献中新冠肺炎恢复期血浆的临床研究。纳入随机临床试验和配对队列研究,调查确诊新冠肺炎住院患者中新冠肺炎恢复期血浆输注与标准护理治疗或安慰剂的比较。电子搜索产生了3841条独特的记录,其中744条被考虑进行全文筛选。评选过程由一个由5名评审员组成的小组独立进行。本研究遵循了系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南。数据由5名独立评审员提取,一式两份,并使用逆方差随机效应模型合并。预先指定的终点是住院期间的全因死亡率。结果:39项随机临床试验纳入系统综述,共有21529名参与者,70项匹配队列研究纳入50160名参与者。独立的荟萃分析报告称,在随机临床试验(比值比[OR],0.87;95%置信区间,0.76-1.00)和匹配队列研究(比值比,0.76;95%可信区间,0.66-0.88)中,与对照队列相比,输注新冠肺炎恢复期血浆与死亡率降低相关。亚组的荟萃分析揭示了2项重要发现。首先,与含有低抗体水平的恢复期血浆相比,用含有高抗体水平的康复期血浆治疗与死亡率降低相关(OR,0.85;95%CI,0.73至0.99),与后期治疗队列相比,早期使用新冠肺炎恢复期血浆治疗与死亡率降低相关(OR,0.63;95%CI,0.48-0.82),特别是那些在病程早期用含有高抗体水平的恢复期血浆治疗的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes
Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes Surgery, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Public Health and Health Policy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
49 days
期刊最新文献
Prognostic Factors and Epidemiology of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis in Southeastern United States Rethinking Measures and Mortality Attribution in Health Care: The Diabetes and Endocrinology Example Lifestyle Medicine in Medical Education: Maximizing Impact
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1